Big Three finally end. India lost both governance and revenue vote.

[Sloth 22]

Again, those advertisers are paying for INTERNATIONAL competition - the value they perceive in pumping that money comes from the calculation that there will be high public interest in INTERNATIONAL competition involving India. If all they cared about was India, then the Ranji trophy and other domestic ODI competitions would be pulling in just as much revenue.

Like I said, the advertisers and television rights bidders might be predominantly from India, but they are pumping in that money because India is playing other countries. That revenue dries up for all parties (including India) if India pulls out or countries other than India pull out.

But BCCI has the financial cushion to last longer than others by not playing ICC organised events. But without India , ICC does not.

India still can continue with its bilateral series because that money doesn't go to ICC.

 

[Shajida Khan]

Those eyes are there because of international competition - India pulls out of the ICC and the international competition goes away and so do those eyes. India loses just as much (if not more) than the other countries.

BCCI can have their own international events. Already, IPL has participation from all places.

 

[Sloth 22]

Just for 2 days more..If the situation remain constant then will india back out ?

If ICC does not agree , in all likelihood.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

No, ICC events are a loss to India. India doesn't make much from them. Majority of the revenues are earned from bilateral series.

Then why is India whining about the revenue from those ICC events?

Next...IPL is a domestic event and BCCI is making billions out of it...

Exactly - ICC event generated revenue should be distributed fairly while domestic league revenue goes directly to the respective boards organizing the events. So what's the problem with the ICC proposal?

 

[ito]

Why not India back out from CT17 and announce its own CT17..ICC will know the reality then where the teams will go to play ?

India doesn't make money from CT17, ICC makes. As far as I know BCCI didn't agreed with the new revenue sharing agreement. So this is not the last word.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

BCCI can have their own international events.

The boards from the countries that would participate in those 'international events' have rejected the BCCI formula for sharing revenue from international events - so why would they then turn around and participate outside of the ICC framework?

Already, IPL has participation from all places.

Great - all that revenue is for India alone, as it should be given it is a BCCI organized event.

 

[Sloth 22]

Exactly - ICC event generated revenue should be distributed fairly while domestic league revenue goes directly to the respective boards organizing the events. So what's the problem with the ICC proposal?

BCCI is rightly claiming a bigger amount based on the fact that more revenues are generated by India. [When India plays ICC organised events ]

 

[H!TchHiker]

India doesn't make money from CT17, ICC makes. As far as I know BCCI didn't agreed with the new revenue sharing agreement. So this is not the last word.

This is not what i am saying..I said india should organize its own champion trophy against ICC organized one...
Since money comes from India so you can invite all cricket board to come and play in your event..
Teach ICC a lesson

 

[ito]

Then why is India whining about the revenue from those ICC events?

Exactly - ICC event generated revenue should be distributed fairly while domestic league revenue goes directly to the respective boards organizing the events. So what's the problem with the ICC proposal?

Because who doesn't want more money. I am sure India has different plans and already vetoed the new model. So this is not the last word.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

BCCI is rightly claiming a bigger amount based on the fact that more revenues are generated by India. [When India plays ICC organised events ]

Again - India only brings one side of the equation - for an event to pull in 'eyes' requires other countries to participate. India by herself is essentially just domestic Indian leagues.

 

[Peshwa]

Those advertisers and bidders for television rights pay all that money because of public interest in international cricket competitions - they don't pay that revenue to just watch Indian players play cricket against each other. It's a two way street.

Advertisers promote events to generate GRPs, ie viewership which gets more eyeballs on their products. With lack of Indian participation, advertisers lose a huge number of viewers which will obviously play into the ROI for the advertiser.
Although, I'm against these arm twisting tactics by BCCI, your argument is not sound as India does pull a lot of traffic to the viewership and in turn affecting advertiser decision on sponsoring an event.
How much it affects is yet to be seen, but the decreased Indian viewership will play its part in the advertiser decision.

 

[Sloth 22]

Teach ICC a lesson

Yes , and for doing it , various methods are there.

 

[ito]

This is not what i am saying..I said india should organize its own champion trophy against ICC organized one...

Let us wait what BCCI determines. I cannot say on behalf of BCCI whether to organize its own champion trophy. Monohar is going, once he is gone, then will India play its cards.

 

[Sloth 22]

Again - India only brings one side of the equation - for an event to pull in 'eyes' requires other countries to participate. India by herself is essentially just domestic Indian leagues.

And it is a matter of contention.

Hopefully the financial results of CT17 without India will teach lessons so that such foolishness is not repeated.

 

[H!TchHiker]

And it is a matter of contention.

Hopefully the financial results of CT17 without India will teach lessons so that such foolishness is not repeated.

India should first decide to stay out of CT17..which India won't do..i will appreciate if they really does it..ICC may be at break even without profit..But what india will get 0