What's new

BIG Pharma says it out aloud!

Arey bhai!....Not a single battle has been fought where a novel drug was concerned. It was and always will be for evergreening cases.

For E.g. My batchmate in AZ is the go to guy for Ticagrelor ..an anti-platelet drug (patented in 2010)
He is in a blue ocean as far as this drug is concerned...its AZ's proprietary drug.

BRILINTA is the trade name...it sells for Rs. 700 for 14 tabs
The same drug (different packaging packaging) sells for $134 for 30 tabs
Its a 6x price difference.

This is the way to go forward :yahoo:

YOu are an Indian Living in Bangladesh ??
 
.
I dont know about others but i am . 20 years patent is necessary . In the meantime Indian or any govt can share expenses to relieve burden on patients for 20 years . After that its available for everyone .
thats exactly my thought.
Patents are there to support innovation not to suppress it, if big pharma companies go against that spirit, punish them.
 
.
YOu are an Indian Living in Bangladesh ??
Haanji sir...India vapis aane ka aamantran de diya hai company ne...Hum chale Chandigarh March se:victory:

thats exactly my thought.
Patents are there to support innovation not to suppress it, if big pharma companies go against that spirit, punish them.
For Pharma industry, a process patent coupled with a original drug or drug delivery system makes sense.

Unfortunately they have been successfully gaming the system for decades!:sniper:
 
Last edited:
.
Good morning bayers!!!

These are the same people that knowingly sold HIV infected drugs to poor countries to clear out bad stock, after about 10,000 people in the US got infected with HIV and they were forced to stop selling it there.
:tup::tup::tup:
 
.
'We didn't make this medicine for Indians… we made it for western patients who can afford it': Pharmaceutical chief tries to stop India replicating its cancer treatment
article-2545360-1AEE7D7000000578-266_306x423.jpg


The CEO of phamaceutical giant Bayer has sparked fury after announcing one of the firm's drugs was for 'western patients who can afford it'.

Marijn Dekkers made the inflammatory comments after the Indian company Natco Pharma Ltd. were granted a government licence to produce a copy of Bayer’s cancer drug Nexavar which they will sell for 97 per cent less than the original product.

Under Indian law the government grants compulsory licenses to domestic firms to produce copies of drugs if the original isn’t available locally at a reasonable price, regardless of whether they are under patent.

Mr Deekers, who has previously described India's patent laws as 'essentially theft', said: 'We did not develop this medicine for Indians. We developed it for western patients who can afford it.'

Nexavar, which is also known as Sorafenib, has been approved for the treatment of kidney cancer, advanced liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma), and thyroid cancers that are resistant to radioactive iodine treatment.

Currently a kidney cancer patient would pay $96,000 (£58,000) for a year's course of the Bayer-made drug. However the cost of the Natco version would be around $2,800 (£1,700).

Mr Deekers later posted a comment on a Forbes magazine blog claiming he regretted the way the comment was received.

He wrote: 'I regret that what was a quick response from me within the framework of a panel discussion at the recent FT Pharma conference has come across in a different way as it was meant by myself.

'However, I was particularly frustrated by the Indian government’s decision, to not protect a patent on Nexavar that was given to us by the Indian patent authority.


article-2545360-08FA5021000005DC-666_634x433.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png
+2
Nexavar: Currently a kidney cancer patient would pay (£58,00 for a year's course of the Bayer-made drug. However the cost of the Natco version would be around £1,700



'I remain firm that there is no excuse for any country to weaken the intellectual property rights. Without new medicines people in developing countries – as well as those in the more prosperous countries – ultimately will all suffer.'

Dr Manica Balasegaram, the Executive Director, Médecins Sans Frontières Access Campaign, which is trying to increase the availability of cancer drugs in developing countries said Mr Dekker's comments summed up 'everything that is wrong with the multinational pharmaceutical industry.'

She added: 'Bayer is effectively admitting that the drugs they develop are deliberately going to be rationed to the wealthiest patients. This is a side-effect of the way drugs are developed today.

'Pharmaceutical companies are singularly focused on profit and so aggressively push for patents and high drug prices. Diseases that don’t promise a profit are neglected, and patients who can’t afford to pay are cut out of the picture.

'Drug companies claim to care about global health needs, but their track record says otherwise.'

However other commentators have pointed out that drug companies need to be able to charge high prices in order to continue the vital research and development.



Read more: Pharmaceutical chief tries to stop India replicating its cancer treatment | Mail Online

And this is what i have to say to this guy:)
the-finger-250x229.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom