What's new

Biden says US does not seek cold war with China

.
I concede -- there are no political prisoners in China.

Julian Paul Assange takes a look at you.


1663943363692.png
 
. .
Your article has clearly explained the charges and evidence of those people. If organizing riots is a political prisoner, the Black Panther Party is also a political prisoner.


You can compare that. The behavior of your so-called "Chinese political prisoners" is no different from that of the Black Panther Party.

At least there is no such political prisoner as Assange in China, and there is no one in China who is jailed for his speech.
 
.
Your article has clearly explained the charges and evidence of those people. If organizing riots is a political prisoner, the Black Panther Party is also a political prisoner.

So in China, creating art that criticizes the Party is on the same plane as organizing a riot. This is why I concede that there are no political prisoners in China precisely because the Party was smart enough to make the charges vague and widely applicable enough to potentially make over one billion people political prisoners with a signature. Congrats.
 
.
He knows it's a war that US can never win.
Only in new narrow Chinese mind. You guys got conquered by the Japanese in WWII so nobody thinks that a war with China is unwinnable . Just because somebody doesn't want war doesn't mean they are weak.
 
.
We did not fail, we succeeded.

We are still communists. We are not the fake communism of the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union is an imperialist country disguised as a communist. We are the real communists.



Thats funny: if China is true communist/socialist, than how is the income inequality (as measured by Gini coefficient) very close to the US (a capitalistic unequal) country? Or socialism is not part of your communism philosophy and only limited to the authoritarian control of thinking/censors/vote and having Xi become an emperor by being elected for life (or at least till he decides to give it up voluntarily).

China's success was because capitalistic societies worked with China over the last 30 years. Or Chinese industry if stayed in the Communist times would have been exactly where it was in the 50s.

China should be proud of its accomplishments (prosperity in the cities, no starvation that kills millions, and the biggest/fastest economic development in the shortest amount of time). My issue is not against China. But people like you make China some sort of super humans and Communism as a supreme system when it was exactly the opposite of Communism that made China an industrial power.
 
.
Only in new narrow Chinese mind. You guys got conquered by the Japanese in WWII so nobody thinks that a war with China is unwinnable . Just because somebody doesn't want war doesn't mean they are weak.
Talk of nonsense in WW II when china was an agricultural country and japan BS was a modern industralized nation. To make things correct, japan BS never conquered china, period, they were bogged down in stalement. Only fools would think they can conquer china today with all the chinese nukes. You think the Yankees dont want war with china when they think they can win ? They tried the korean, vietnam, afghan and iraq wars when the Yankeess got the chance, their logic with china is no different. The Yankees are not benevolent, peace loving and specially kind to China as you like to delude but most blood thirsty war mongers.
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Talk of nonsense in WW II when china was an agricultural country and japan BS was a modern industralized nation. To make things correct, japan BS never conquered china, period, they were bogged down in stalement. Only fools would think they can conquer china today with all the chinese nukes. You think the Yankees dont want war with china when they think they can win ? They tried the korean, vietnam, afghan and iraq wars when the Yankeess got the chance, their logic with china is no different. The Yankees are not benevolent, peace loving and specially kind to China as you like to delude but most blood thirsty war mongers.
My comments are never intended to portray US or NATO as having a clear moral advantage or compass. But it was a response to the other poster saying that 'US can never win a war with China' and the superhuman taint of Chinese people he puts when all the data proves otherwise.

Japan didn't need to concur all of China, no more so than Russia needs to conquer all of Ukraine. They were there as far as they needed to be till they got into a stalemate like China did with a much inferior Vietnam in 79.
 
. .
My comments are never intended to portray US or NATO as having a clear moral advantage or compass. But it was a response to the other poster saying that 'US can never win a war with China' and the superhuman taint of Chinese people he puts when all the data proves otherwise.

Japan didn't need to concur all of China, no more so than Russia needs to conquer all of Ukraine. They were there as far as they needed to be till they got into a stalemate like China did with a much inferior Vietnam in 79.
Vietnam never got into stalemate with china in 1979, it was never chinese intention to occupy any vietnamese land. China just wanted to punish vietnam, to inflict damages to vietnamese defense line and industry near the borders, china just planned the fighting for a month and then withdrew. its more like the 1962 war with india.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom