Bhutanese Scholar: Doklam is free from Trespassers. May the Deities of Bhutan always prevail !

[Figaro]

LMao! As I said, deep down even you know that Chinese lost this round,. Yes you guys will come back and bite us in the *** later on, but this round goes to India.

You seriously are delusional my Indian bhai. If India won this round, then why was it the first party to withdraw? Simple. India is the loser and it lost the Battle of Doklam without even fighting a single shot. If you read Clausewitz or Sun Tzu, you'd realize the greatest victory is the one won without any bloodshed.

But of course, I cannot say so for the poor Indian who got his spine absolutely destroyed by that kick

 

[Dungeness]

LMao! As I said, deep down even you know that Chinese lost this round,. Yes you guys will come back and bite us in the *** later on, but this round goes to India.

If you insist India won, ok, it doesn't really matter to me, though many of us actually wanted government to take a much tougher stand against India, just like many PDF members from all your surrounding countries. I have long predicted there would be no "hot war". Search for it in this forum.

By the way, Chinese just started building 30 new border road projects in Tibet on Aug, 20. Go figure!

 

[Figaro]

LMao! As I said, deep down even you know that Chinese lost this round,. Yes you guys will come back and bite us in the *** later on, but this round goes to India.




Oh come on mate, do you really think a random American would give a toss about India-China flare up and know things in such detail?

@Figaro is a chinese, a coward one, but chinese.

Uhhhhh ... you can pretend I'm Chinese all you like. Just because many Westerners hate China does not mean that no Westerner can like China. You can continue your ad hominem attacks all you want but it just makes you Indians look dumber and dumber (albeit from a low base)

If you insist India won, ok, it doesn't really matter to me, though many of us actually wanted government to take a much tougher stand against, just like many PDF members from all your surrounding countries.

By the way, Chinese just started building 30 new border road projects on Aug, 20. Go figure!

He is delusional. He is definitely smoking some herbs ... . Maybe to relieve the physical and mental pain of India being humiliated once more. Maybe he has PTSD from this whole incident ...

LMao! As I said, deep down even you know that Chinese lost this round,. Yes you guys will come back and bite us in the *** later on, but this round goes to India.




Oh come on mate, do you really think a random American would give a toss about India-China flare up and know things in such detail?

@Figaro is a chinese, a coward one, but chinese.

On a side note, why are Indians at the Chinese border all heavily built Sikhs? Are the Hindoos too weak to do the fighting ...? Because all I see are ethnic minorities in India's army. LOL. The Indian army may as well be called the Sikh national army . The fight for India because the majority of Hindus will are too frail to fight

 

[Dungeness]

Ok. Like to Add/ correct few things.

First All, I must say few of the things are correct mentioned in above blog but truth require to be told:

1. Indian Army Already have Huge Base in Haa'n, Bhutan & yes, this standoff was not asked by Bhutan but Told to Bhutan.

*Also before road construction had started, China had sent written notice regarding the same. Indian Army didn't replied but preferred to wait. when construction started they Just thrown everything in front of PLA Senior officers. This was not expected by them even in dreams.

2. China is making investment in Bhutan and almost bought it after presenting millions of Dollar to King. Even installed huge statue of King in Bhutan

3. Bhutan is transforming and 2nd generation of royal family don't like the word " Protectorate state " claim of India. But then they have to live with this.

4. Still Bhutan is over depend on India even for basic necessities like Education. But due to lack of Jobs for them they are not much interested to work in India and wants to go elsewhere like China.

5. Even in current stand off Bhutan wants to Directly deal with China and same was conveyed to China as well but Indian Elephant in the room was too big to Deal with even if Bhutan & China had come openly against us.

Bhutan politicians are more scare of India then China. Population wise, consensus is towards India as they feel Indian Democracy is easy to live with then Chinese martial law. Monks are allowed by China to visit Tibbet whenever they want. so Bhutanese monks don't have much problem with China as well.

It is very unusual to read such a well balanced quality post regarding Bhutan from an Indian member, Thanks.

Two points:

1. What makes Indian Army in position to "Tell to Bhutan";
2. China doesn't have "Martial Law" anywhere, rather J&K and parts of NE have been under martial law for many years.

 

[Han Patriot]

It is very unusually to read such a well balanced quality post regarding Bhutan from an Indian member, Thanks.

Two points:

1. What makes Indian Army in position to "Tell to Bhutan";
2. China doesn't have "Martial Law" anywhere, rather J&K and parts of NE have been under martial law for many years.

I agree rather fair assessment. India had been strangling Bhutan for decades, time to free this brother from the monster. Send in our LF and destroy this black beast.

 

[Figaro]

It is very unusually to read such a well balanced quality post regarding Bhutan from an Indian member, Thanks.

Two points:

1. What makes Indian Army in position to "Tell to Bhutan";
2. China doesn't have "Martial Law" anywhere, rather J&K and parts of NE have been under martial law for many years.

1. Because Bhutan is a de-facto protectorate of India. The latter controls most of Bhutan's economy, diplomacy, and military matters. Hence, Bhutan does not get much of a say in foreign politics ... simple. This is the reason why they haven't forged diplomatic relations with China yet.
2. China rarely enforces martial law. The last time they did in Tibet was during the 2008 racial riots ...

 

[phancong]

What did Indian soldiers cross over the borders achieve only unilaterally withdraw without escalating into a full fledge war with China? The territory still patrol by China without Bhutan objection. India action could only delay China construction of roads for couple months but China can restart the construction any time they want. India made a big fuss by sent soldiers only withdrawn unconditionally.

In 1962 Nahru at least had the ball to waited for Chinese soldiers evicted the Indian soldiers in trespassed into China territory.

 

[sputnik]

It is very unusually to read such a well balanced quality post regarding Bhutan from an Indian member, Thanks.

Two points:

1. What makes Indian Army in position to "Tell to Bhutan";
2. China doesn't have "Martial Law" anywhere, rather J&K and parts of NE have been under martial law for many years.

Well Practically speaking:
1. Indian Army is in Bhutan from British Era. Bhutan and Nepali royal family don't have very fruitful relations from earlier time and that is Why Bhutan Royal Family Asked British to Station there troops there. Later on, Bhutan nationals start getting recruited in Indian Army along with Nepali Gorkha and Royal family allowed Indian Army to stay in Haa'n. In day to Day work they don't interact with Bhutan govt. much. So when situation start evolving in Doklam, they simply did as per their standing orders.

2. Yes, I know china don't have martial law but this is popular word in NE India for Chinese Communism. Even more than 20,000 Chinese in Kolkata feeling safe in India compare to China. So, Please live with this.
And NO neither J & K nor NE india have martial law. it is people elected civil govt. every where. Don't read too much Pak. post.

If u believe i am correct about stand off situation then believe my word on rest as well.

 

[Han Patriot]

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1487932.shtml

Q: The Indian government's announcement is that there is a "mutual disengagement" of the troops between the two countries. You haven't mentioned the pullback of the Chinese troops. You mentioned only the pullback of the Indian troops. How do you explain?

A: The Chinese side has made it clear that the Indian border personnel and equipment that trespassed into China's territory have all been withdrawn to the Indian side of the border. The Chinese border troops continue with their patrols in the Dong Lang area. China will continue with its exercise of sovereign rights to protect territorial sovereignty in accordance with the stipulations of the border-related historical treaty.

 

[Dungeness]

And NO neither J & K nor NE india have martial law. it is people elected civil govt. every where. Don't read too much Pak. post.

It may not be called "Martial Law", but some special law allows India soldiers shoot to kill.

"Indian security forces have for more than half a decade had sweeping shoot-to-kill powers in so-called "disturbed areas" under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA)."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33007086

 

[Han Patriot]

It may not be called "Martial Law", but some special law allows India soldiers shoot to kill.

"Indian security forces have for more than half a decade had sweeping shoot-to-kill powers in so-called "disturbed areas" under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA)."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33007086

Means they can shoot civilians at will. Democracy? Human rights?

 

[Dungeness]

Means they can shoot civilians at will. Democracy? Human rights?

It is unimaginable in China, a so called "evil commie state". India is lucky to get away with murder.

 

[sputnik]

It may not be called "Martial Law", but some special law allows India soldiers shoot to kill.

"Indian security forces have for more than half a decade had sweeping shoot-to-kill powers in so-called "disturbed areas" under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA)."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33007086

But the same BBC never said Indian Army was not invited by Bhutan to current stand off nor it said India is aggressor here. Looks like u have ulterior motives to score brown points for yellow race.
ALL the best with that.

 

[Han Patriot]

It is unimaginable in China, a so called "evil commie state". India is lucky to get away with murder.

You get demonstations and riots on a weekly basis in India. Imagine I went to India 4-5 times, 2 times out of that I faced some sort of riots, one was the water riots in bangalore and another some protest stopping traffic in Chennai. Utter chaos man.

 

[Dungeness]

But the same BBC never said Indian Army was not invited by Bhutan to current stand off nor it said India is aggressor here. Looks like u have ulterior motives to score brown points for yellow race.
ALL the best with that.

Do you have to resort to racist slur? We have been discussing the facts, and you suddenly burst into such rage? Just because I pointed out a mistake in your statement?

Now I am sure you are an Indian.