Bhutan rejects Beijing's claim that Doklam belongs to China

[Rollno21]

So someone heard this and the Indian media reported it? Did it quote directly from the mouth of that 'Chinese official'? All I see here is an Indian site making an Indian claim, which we know amounts to nothing.

Any andha hai Kya,see the names who said it and where it was said unlike ,the person claiming Bhutan told Chinese that it's China's land without naming the person

 

[Han Patriot]

Any andha hai Kya,see the names who said it and where it was said unlike ,the person claiming Bhutan told Chinese that it's China's land without naming the person

Yup according to an Indian quoting some Indian who quoted some Chinese?

 

[Stephen Cohen]

India, China Should Ink New Boundary Pact In Sikkim: Chinese Military Analyst

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indi...ct-in-sikkim-chinese-military-analyst-1735895

 

[Taimoor Khan]

"Bhutan has conveyed to the Chinese side, both on the ground and through the diplomatic channel, that the construction of the (motorable) road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the (written) agreements (of 1988 and 1998) and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between our two countries."

No mention of India anywhere. It's bilateral matter between China and Bhutan.

 

[Kal Muah]

Any andha hai Kya,see the names who said it and where it was said unlike ,the person claiming Bhutan told Chinese that it's China's land without naming the person

Bhai @Han Warrior apna lahori launda hai, pakda gaya yeh dusre thread mein, kyun time kharab kar rahe ho apna

 

[Jackdaws]

Bhai @Han Warrior apna lahori launda hai, pakda gaya yeh dusre thread mein, kyun time kharab kar rahe ho apna

LOL - can't blame him then. Wonder why he is ashamed of his real identity though?

 

[Han Patriot]

Bhai @Han Warrior apna lahori launda hai, pakda gaya yeh dusre thread mein, kyun time kharab kar rahe ho apna

Bro, I don't speak Indian.

 

[egodoc222]

Lol even Bhutan is giving China sh!t!

 

[ashok321]

"Bhutan has conveyed to the Chinese side, both on the ground and through the diplomatic channel, that the construction of the (motorable) road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the (written) agreements (of 1988 and 1998) and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between our two countries."

No mention of India anywhere. It's bilateral matter between China and Bhutan.

Correct.

But Machiavellian Modi comes touting his India Bhutan friendship treaty to extend his pretext, which has no locus standi either in International legal arena. Because it is not a defense co-operation treaty.

Merely by signing any friendship treaty with your neighbor does not give you a right to fight or encroach upon (land) any other 3rd party so involved. As is the case of China here.

Do you wonder why India did not seek an option to knock ICJ door?
Something that they did against Pakistan?
India knows it has no case or recourse.

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Whatever you say indian bro.......

 

[Kal Muah]

Bro, I don't speak Indian.

Yes yes I can understand that, "CHINI MEDIA"

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Yes yes I can understand that, "CHINI MEDIA"

Fake indian a--ss h---ole.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Correct.

But Machiavellian Modi comes touting his India Bhutan friendship treaty to extend his pretext, which has no locus standi either in International legal arena. Because it is not a defense co-operation treaty.

Merely by signing any friendship treaty with your neighbor does not give you a right to fight or encroach upon (land) any other 3rd party so involved. As is the case of China here.

Do you wonder why India did not seek an option to knock ICJ door?
Something that they did against Pakistan?
India knows it has no case or recourse.

Baygani shadi main Modi dewana.

 

[ashok321]

Baygani shadi main Modi dewana.

Begani shaadi me Modi = ulu deewana.

 

[Kal Muah]

Fake indian a--ss h---ole.

@Grevion bhai dekho CPEC ka side effect..slowly slowly all the pakistanis are turning into chinese