Bharatis dreaming of capturing AJK and GB (video)

[mudas777]

Those delusional pencil necks dream of much more than that.

Indians start having wet dreams since we stopped supporting insurgency movements in India. We need and must help India to implode from within so these dreams can be crushed once for all and Indians wake up to the rude awakening.

 

[Azadkashmir]

what kind of wet dream is this? what india is gona do, shoot pellets at Azad Kashmir ppl and liberate it.

These thick bastrds dont get it, the most anti indian ppl are azad k ppl. pakistan should call in brit pakistanis (ak roots) for training, as this group is most anti Indian.

 

[D-day]

what kind of wet dream is this? what india is gona do, shoot pellets at Azad Kashmir ppl and liberate it.

These thick bastrds dont get it, the most anti indian ppl are azad k ppl. pakistan should call in brit pakistanis (ak roots) for training, as this group is most anti Indian.

Nah. I think people in occupied Kashmir are the most Patriotic Pakistanies.

 

[Azadkashmir]

Nah. I think people in occupied Kashmir are the most Patriotic Pakistanies.

brit paks take the lead.

 

[baqai]

jaldi ajao chai peetay hain lahore gymkhana mai

 

[Goritoes]

After 72 years J&K Kashmiri's still love Pakistan more, and hate Indians and they are talking about Gilgits people to love them? LOL matlab kuch bhi ?

 

[Azadkashmir]

After 72 years J&K Kashmiri's still love Pakistan more, and hate Indians and they are talking about Gilgits people to love them? LOL matlab kuch bhi ?

Indian forgotten their star pilot was captured in kashmir and got a bloody nose then served tea.

 

[Goritoes]

Indian forgotten their star pilot was captured in kashmir and got a bloody nose then served tea.

They remember it well, we Pakistani's made sure of it

 

[koolio]

These Sanghi's are full of wet dreams, who in the right mind wants to live with these cow urine drinkers and covering their whole bodies with cow dung that is causing deadly black fungus.

if you look at the comments in that video, most Hindustani's agree that taking back GB and Azad Kashmir is a piece of cake, now they have mighty Rafales they should immediately launch their biggest operation but the counter attack from Pakistan will so deadly, Pakistan will take whole of J&K.

 

[adelphi]

Eh we did a plebiscite in Junagarh and people wanted to stay with India (obviously as it’s Hindu majority) so it is a part of our country. J&K acceded to India as only Kashmir is Muslim majority, Jammu is Hindu majority and Ladakh is Buddhist majority. And Nehru had announced that he was ready for plebiscite there as well as per UN Resolutions in which Pakistan had to vacate all occupied territories and then majority Indian forces had to vacate the occupied territories and only a few should have been allowed for maintaining law and order when UN will conduct the plebiscite. Pakistan never followed the first rule and kept their presence in their side of J&K hence the plebiscite never happened as per UN resolutions. And now it won’t happen as after simla agreement both sides agreed that Kashmir issue is a bilateral issue between Republic of India and Islamic Republic of Pakistan and no 3rd party involvement is allowed. So only bilateral talks can solve this, best it to make LoC as International Border and prevent useless fighting and focus on development, it is better for all.

You are ill informed. J&K never acceded to India & instrument of accession by maharaja was done under dubious circumstances. Secondly UN resolutions required both Pakistan & india to withdraw. There is no mention of who needs to withdraw first. Thirdly simla agreement doesn't specifically rule out or prohibit third party mediation.

 

[HostileInsurgent]

You are ill informed. J&K never acceded to India & instrument of accession by maharaja was done under dubious circumstances. Secondly UN resolutions required both Pakistan & india to withdraw. There is no mention of who needs to withdraw first. Thirdly simla agreement doesn't specifically rule out or prohibit third party mediation.

All of your points are wrong, if we look at your first point that he signed under dubious circumstances, then who created that circumstance? Pakistan Army with Pashtoon irregulars attacked J&K and when Mahararaja’s Army was unable to stop them then Maharaja came to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and asked for help for which the condition was put that Indian armed forces is for the protection of the Republic of India and can not operate on foreign soil, so you’ll have to accede with India so that Army can operate there, after which Indian army pushed back the Pashtoon irregulars to a boundary called cease fire line which today is called LoC.


Your 2nd point is partially incorrect, I feel you should read it once properly.

And your 3rd point is also incorrect, simla agreement signed between India and Pakistan after the 1971 war clearly implied that:

Both countries will "settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations". India has, many a times, maintained that Kashmir dispute is a bilateral issue and must be settled through bilateral negotiations as per Simla Agreement, 1972 and thus, had denied any third party intervention even that of United Nations.

So J&K issue has to be bilaterally solved and UN involvement or any other 3rd party involvement is not acceptable to both sides as per the resolution.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

All of your points are wrong, if we look at your first point that he signed under dubious circumstances, then who created that circumstance? Pakistan Army with Pashtoon irregulars attacked J&K and when Mahararaja’s Army was unable to stop them then Maharaja came to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and asked for help for which the condition was put that Indian armed forces is for the protection of the Republic of India and can not operate on foreign soil, so you’ll have to accede with India so that Army can operate there, after which Indian army pushed back the Pashtoon irregulars to a boundary called cease fire line which today is called LoC.


Your 2nd point is partially incorrect, I feel you should read it once properly.
View attachment 760470


And your 3rd point is also incorrect, simla agreement signed between India and Pakistan after the 1971 war clearly implied that:




So J&K issue has to be bilaterally solved and UN involvement or any other 3rd party involvement is not acceptable to both sides as per the resolution.

Good PS editing skill by you

 

[adelphi]

All of your points are wrong, if we look at your first point that he signed under dubious circumstances, then who created that circumstance? Pakistan Army with Pashtoon irregulars attacked J&K and when Mahararaja’s Army was unable to stop them then Maharaja came to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and asked for help for which the condition was put that Indian armed forces is for the protection of the Republic of India and can not operate on foreign soil, so you’ll have to accede with India so that Army can operate there, after which Indian army pushed back the Pashtoon irregulars to a boundary called cease fire line which today is called LoC.


Your 2nd point is partially incorrect, I feel you should read it once properly.
View attachment 760470


And your 3rd point is also incorrect, simla agreement signed between India and Pakistan after the 1971 war clearly implied that:




So J&K issue has to be bilaterally solved and UN involvement or any other 3rd party involvement is not acceptable to both sides as per the resolution.

Maharaja had standstill agreement with both Pakistan & india, so any unilateral acession with india was illegal to start with. Secondly the revolt against him was direct reaction of his brutal action against the local kashmiris. The situation was not initiated by Pakistan.

Share full statement of UN resolution not the section related to Pakistan. The statement says tribesmen & not regular army. Also this was to be done after the UN comission was to be established. The resolution also stated what india was supposed to do. Kindly share that as well.
Lastly as suggested in Simla agreement bilateral negotiation bounds both countries to find a solution & doesn't categorically state that third party party mediation is illegal or previous UN resolutions are now void.
This also important considering the fact that india until now considers issues related to IOK as it's internal matter. Also 370 is again a breach by india as by Simla accord it can't take any unilateral actions regarding IOK.
The truth is indian actions so far have been full of deceit & has no moral grounds, evident by it's preference of status co.

 

[Chakar The Great]

Days of capturing land are gone - any state seen as an aggressor invites international censure and pressure to return to status quo.

Yea right, but China took over 1000sq km of your area while you guys are still confused and begging for de escalation.

Thats how super power capture land.

Some suggestions to Pak civil mil establishment.

1. Declare Junagadh and munavdar as part of Pakistan and have at least 2 seats each in parliament.

2. Have a remembrance day for the invasion of Junagadh and hyderabad deccan.

3. Officially ask india to prosecute war criminals as per the sundar lal committee report. And also on Jammu genocide.

these are just symbolic steps.

Junagadh has been reclaimed by Pakistan, its on Pakistan's official map.

 

[Jackdaws]

Yea right, but China took over 1000sq km of your area while you guys are still confused and begging for de escalation.

Thats how super power capture land.

Lol. Did the Chinese tell you that?