What's new

Bhagat Singh and Savarkar, Two Petitions that Tell Us the Difference Between Hind and Hindutva

fsayed

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
2,606
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
http://thewire.in/2016/03/23/bhagat-singh-and-savarkar-a-tale-of-two-petitions-25657/

Bhagat Singh and Savarkar, Two Petitions that Tell Us the Difference Between Hind and Hindutva

The Wire


Search...

FEATURED
Bhagat Singh and Savarkar, Two Petitions that Tell Us the Difference Between Hind and Hindutva
BY THE WIRE STAFF ON 23/03/2016 • 48 COMMENTS
SHARE THIS:
Facebook10K+TwitterPrintMore
bhagat singh savarkarEighty-five years ago, on March 23, 1931, Shaheed Bhagat Singh and his two comrades-in-arms, Shaheed Rajguru and Shaheed Sukhdev were hanged in Lahore by the British colonial government. At the time of his martyrdom, Bhagat Singh was barely 23 years old. Despite the fact that he had his whole life ahead of him, he refused to seek clemency from the British as some well-wishers and family members wanted him to do. In his last petition and testament, he demanded that the British be true to the charge they laid against him of waging war against the colonial state and that he be executed by firing squad and not by hanging. The document also lays out his vision for an India whose working people are free from exploitation by either British or Indian “parasites”.

At a time when the Bharatiya Janata Party national executive has decided to make nationalism its rallying cry, it is useful to compare the patriotic attitude and vision of Bhagat Singh with that of the Sangh parivar’s icon, V.D. Savarkar, author and originator of the concept of ‘Hindutva’, which the BJP swears by.

Sent to the notorious Cellular Jail in the Andamans in 1911 for his revolutionary activity, Savarkar first petitioned the British for early release within months of beginning his 50 year sentence. Then again in 1913 and several times till he was finally transferred to a mainland prison in 1921 before his final release in 1924. The burden of his petitions: let me go and I will give up the fight for independence and be loyal to the colonial government.

Savarkar’s defenders insist his promises were a tactical ploy; but his critics say they were not, and that he stayed true to his promise after leaving the Andamans by staying away from the freedom struggle and actually helping the British with his divisive theory of ‘Hindutva’, which was another form of the Muslim League’s Two Nation theory.

Reproduced below are Shaheed Bhagat Singh’s last petition and the petition V.D. Savarkar filed in 1913.

Shaheed Bhagat Singh’s Last Petition
Lahore Jail, 1931
bhagat singh jail
To: The Punjab Governor

Sir, With due respect we beg to bring to your kind notice the following:That we were sentenced to death on 7th October 1930 by a British Court, L.C.C Tribunal, constituted under the Sp. Lahore Conspiracy Case Ordinance, promulgated by the H.E. The Viceroy, the Head of the British Government of India, and that the main charge against us was that of having waged war against H.M. King George, the King of England.

The above-mentioned finding of the Court pre-supposed two things:

Firstly, that there exists a state of war between the British Nation and the Indian Nation and, secondly, that we had actually participated in that war and were therefore war prisoners.

The second pre-supposition seems to be a little bit flattering, but nevertheless it is too tempting to resist the desire of acquiescing in it.

As regards the first, we are constrained to go into some detail. Apparently there seems to be no such war as the phrase indicates.

Nevertheless, please allow us to accept the validity of the pre-supposition taking it at its face value. But in order to be correctly understood we must explain it further.

Let us declare that the state of war does exist and shall exist so long as the Indian toiling masses and the natural resources are being exploited by a handful of parasites.

They may be purely British capitalist or mixed British and Indian or even purely Indian. They may be carrying on their insidious exploitation through mixed or even on purely Indian bureaucratic apparatus. All these things make no difference.

Read more below link
http://thewire.in/2016/03/23/bhagat-singh-and-savarkar-a-tale-of-two-petitions-25657/
 
.
The Real Nationalist Bhagat Singh Vs. Pseudo Nationalist Savarkar....
Bhagat-SinghCongresscriticiseSavarkar.png.jpg
 
. . . .
You can tag gandhi family pujaris , AAPtards and their Pakistani fans . Dont bother about Bhakts. Go ahead and prove Savarkar was anti national. :wave:

The liberal clowns who got their butts handed to them on 19th May are pulling issues out of thin air. Somehow its Bhagat Singh Vs Savarkar, as if right wing is denying Bhagat Singh's contribution.

Textbook definition of grasping at straws, (trying to find some way to succeed when nothing you choose is likely to work).:lol::lol::lol:

CjJU307UUAATFcd.jpg


Desh badal raha hai.:D
 
Last edited:
. . .
ha ha 90% of Indians on PDF (bhakts) have not responded to this thread
What will they say. Khoongress, Pseudo Liberal, Suckular, Italian Gandhis will mostly figure in or be part of the senseless sentences they utter. :D
 
.
who was this savarkar dude???

why is bhagat singh is getting campared with him???

The liberal clowns who got their butts handed to them on 19th May are pulling issues out of thin air. Somehow its Bhagat Singh Vs Savarkar, as if right wing is denying Bhagat Singh's contribution.

Textbook definition of grasping at straws, (trying to find some way to succeed when nothing you choose is likely to work).:lol::lol::lol:

CjJU307UUAATFcd.jpg


Desh badal raha hai.:D


desh badal rha hai.................feku udh rha hai
 
.
who was this savarkar dude???

why is bhagat singh is getting campared with him???

Google him and take it up to the person who made the comparison. Hardly my concern. :coffee:


desh badal rha hai.................feku udh rha hai

Kyun nahi udega bhai, he won the election with a thumping majority. Kuch becharon ki toh jamanat jabt ho gayi thi.:devil:
 
. .
The basic premise in comparing the two is flawed.

The common thread between the two is what they did against the British rulers & that cannot be taken away from either of them. The nation respects both of them for this.

Now, its being held against Savarkar that he sought clemency.

Does seeking clemency dilute what he did ? If not, then whats the point intended to be made. Both the acts that he did & the plea made were his personal decisions.

Fast forward to the present, the killers of Indira Gandhi & people like Afzal Guru all made pleas for clemency. Yet they are considered heroes ( misplaced in my POV) by people who support their actions.

A worthless proposition.
 
.
Google him and take it up to the person who made the comparison. Hardly my concern. :coffee:




Kyun nahi udega bhai, he won the election with a thumping majority. Kuch becharon ki toh jamanat jabt ho gayi thi.:devil:


googled him...................looks like right wing fanatic who licked britishers ................weakling
 
.
Back
Top Bottom