Bestiality is on the rise in india

[Goenitz]

@Turingsage
how can we top if we have less population... anyway, statistics can be fudged..
why the report revealed muslim names of goat incident but not of Kerala person?

 

[SecularNationalist]

Leave him alone he is in a shock after seeing this video and high on Cowcola the favorite inDiun Drink.
In fact, how these search engines manage to get these results where it's all strictly banned and monitored so do not waste your time on a bhagat who has nothing good to do but to try to cover his bare a$$ by pointing others for nothing.

Exactly Good points made by you.
Pornn sites of all sorts are banned in Pakistan,you cannot access those using pakistani IP . So if anyone from Pakistan is watching or unblocking those sites using proxy IP of some other country ,then how the heck you can prove it was a pakistani who watched that animal porrn? RIP Indian logic

 

[CrazyZ]

Exactly Good points made by you.
Pornn sites of all sorts are banned in Pakistan,you cannot access those using pakistani IP . So if anyone from Pakistan is watching or unblocking those sites using proxy IP of some other country ,then how the heck you can prove it was a pakistani who watched that animal porrn? RIP Indian logic

This kind of "tracked" information can be fooled by bots and malware or just made up. I wouldn't take them seriously especially considering the site that is posting the information.

 

[GumNaam]

That is from actual figure released by all search engines as opposed to a youtube rant.

As with many muslims, reality is very very hard to accept when one can descend into collective amnesia and collective delusions

oh lemme guess, all those search engines have nothing better to do than to research beastiality & that too, they presented their "research" to no one but you aye?

as with many hindus, you too have a way of pulling nonexistent "facts" outta your bunghole & then feeding each other with to create a "feel good" euphoria similar to the euphoric high that gow muttar causes... apni "patni gow" kay muttar may doob maro!

 

[SecularNationalist]

oh lemme guess, all those search engines have nothing better to do than to research beastiality & that too, they presented their "research" to no one but you aye?
View attachment 624913 View attachment 624914 View attachment 624915 View attachment 624916 View attachment 624917 View attachment 624918 View attachment 624919 View attachment 624920
as with many hindus, you too have a way of pulling nonexistent "facts" outta your bunghole & then feeding each other with to create a "feel good" euphoria similar to the euphoric high that gow muttar causes... apni "patni gow" kay muttar may doob maro!

The above dog marriage pics gave whole new meaning to "doggy style"

 

[pothead]

This from WikiIslam. THESE ARE ACTUAL REAL COUNTED ENUMERATED RECORDED STATISTICS NOT A YOUTUBE RANT

"Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:

Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)[2]"

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Pornography

Horray,
They are now number one in so many animal sex categories...

Little surprise though....

Snake Sex...WTF, how is it physically possible?
Bear and elephant...Suicide by sex?
And how do you even do it with a cat...

Man, these guys are awesome...

 

[Clutch]

Thank God for Pakistan!... We are definitely from two different races,.places, morality, and Deen.

 

[Khanivore]

This from WikiIslam. THESE ARE ACTUAL REAL COUNTED ENUMERATED RECORDED STATISTICS NOT A YOUTUBE RANT

"Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:

Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)[2]"

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Pornography

STAFF: @waz @Arsalan @The Eagle @WebMaster

This site: wikiislam.net is a controversial site, run by FFI that is anti-Islam. It's funny that this guy @Turingsage knows exactly what to source and where from. You be the judge as to how authentic his sourced info is on Islam or data on Muslim nations.

Extract on WikiIslam.net from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Freedom_International:
"In September 2006, FFI launched[27] WikiIslam, a community-edited wiki collecting critical and often incorrect material about Islam.[28] According to the FAQ section on the website, "the main difference between WikiIslam and Wikipedia is that opinions critical of Islam are not censored on WikiIslam for political correctness".[28] Due to the controversial nature of the website, it has been subject to vandalism, due to which increased security measures have been employed.

WikiIslam was the subject of an article in the 7/2007 issue of the journal Contemporary Islam, entitled "Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam",[28] which argues that the website commits selection bias by collecting only negative or critical material.[28][29] The article states that "In relation to the criteria set up by the Runnymede Trust ... it should be quite easy to label most of the material published on WikiIslam as expressions of Islamophobia." Göran Larsson adds that "[m]y impression is that the stories reported by WikiIslam have merely been selected to show that Muslims are ignorant, backward or even stupid."[28][30] Because of the presence of material obtained from other websites, such as MEMRI, the article notes that "it becomes much more difficult to argue that all information posted on WikiIslam is Islamophobic by nature".[28]

In August 2008, the WikiIslam site was moved to a new server and since then it has been operating independently.[31]"

@Turingsage You're a low-life scumbag. Plain and simple.