Multani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2010
- Messages
- 2,431
- Reaction score
- 2
Janta has decided over and over they don't want Mullahtic Sharia.
This is why Pakistanis have never voted Mullahs to be majority in the city called "Islam-Abad".
90% or more of the janta consults Islamic Scholars in Pakistan
For me - Usually 'reason' !
But then what is reasonable & unreasonable or acceptable & unacceptable for me may not be so for you - Hence why man created the notion of 'democracy' - Let the most head's decide !
I foresee this talk of Shariah in the same context as English Civil Law - Both are legal paradigms; if there is nothing wrong with a Turk sitting in the US saying that he thinks that the US should adopt the Swiss Civil Code or the English Civil Law or the Turkish rendition of the Swiss Civil Code or the French Civil Law or the US Law....I don't see whats wrong with someone saying 'I think the following provision of Islamic Jurisprudence is meritorious & I think we ought to include it within our Common Law - Lets put it up for a vote' !
What I would find unreasonable is for the State for saying - No...you can't; even if you're able to convince the voters, their representatives or the courts - You still can't do it !
Thats why I say - Pluralism instead of Secularism !
ma sha Allah, excellent post. Brother you have given the best answers to this thread