Ben Shapiro got owned by BBC(Logic man destroyed by logics)

[RAMPAGE]

What is his argument, apart from protecting Israel?

There are plenty of others. Most of them have to do with providing a counterargument to postmodern propaganda against western institutions which have their basis in classical liberalism.

The Islamists, of course, just love the post-modernists since they are their sole ally in carrying out their victim politics. Sure the Israeli response to Hamas is very heavy-handed and results in considerable collateral damage, but why on earth should that keep Muslims from taking the trouble to be open to the Israeli argument? Hamas is not the least bit interested in a settlement and is the sole impediment, along with the mindset it represents, to a solution to this conflict.

Why on earth should Muslims wish the destruction of the only constructive people in the Middle East? What's keeping us from talking to the Israelis aside from an Arab equivalent of Lashkar e Taiba?

 

[Lagay Raho]

what do you guys think about Jordan Peterson?

 

[xyx007]

typical Jewish nature argue by his Logical Fallacies. This type of Jewish approach prevails in the study of the Talmud in the traditional world of the yeshivot.We have also seen in so many Quran surah where Allah responded them all their logical questions beautifully but they are still among a unbeliever.

 

[Mamadouso]

There are plenty of others. Most of them have to do with providing a counterargument to postmodern propaganda against western institutions which have their basis in classical liberalism.

The Islamists, of course, just love the post-modernists since they are their sole ally in carrying out their victim politics. Sure the Israeli response to Hamas is very heavy-handed and results in considerable collateral damage, but why on earth should that keep Muslims from taking the trouble to be open to the Israeli argument? Hamas is not the least bit interested in a settlement and is the sole impediment, along with the mindset it represents, to a solution to this conflict.

Why on earth should Muslims wish the destruction of the only constructive people in the Middle East? What's keeping us from talking to the Israelis aside from an Arab equivalent of Lashkar e Taiba?

I understand your approach, having government relations with Israel should be the route for Islamic countries. Not endorsement of their actions but just having diplomatic contact. Ignoring them will not solve anything.

I find it very selective when the focus is just on ‘Hamas’ as usually orchestrated by Israeli manipulators in media. Why then is the West Bank still under seige, campaign to build third temple and the deteriorating position of Arab citizens of Israel.

The whole concoction of a perfect Israel fighting against nasty Hamas is only one small part of the overall picture

 

[RAMPAGE]

I understand your approach, having government relations with Israel should be the route for Islamic countries. Not endorsement of their actions but just having diplomatic contact. Ignoring them will not solve anything.

I find it very selective when the focus is just on ‘Hamas’ as usually orchestrated by Israeli manipulators in media. Why then is the West Bank still under seige, campaign to build third temple and the deteriorating position of Arab citizens of Israel.

The whole concoction of a perfect Israel fighting against nasty Hamas is only one small part of the overall picture

No such thing as a perfect Israel, but I still consider it to be the most "constructive" state in the region. There is a new Israeli generation that is much less paranoid than the ones that came before it, and Muslims need to grow up, stop viewing Israel as a monster, and build a working relationship with it.

As for the persistent Israeli encroachments, had Arabs and Iranis gained leverage by building economic and strategic partnerships with Israel, there would've been no encroachments. From Israel's viewpoint, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't, so why the hell not do it? They have nothing to lose. And the fact that they have nothing to lose is something that Arabs and Iranis need to take responsibility for.

 

[Nein]

There are plenty of others. Most of them have to do with providing a counterargument to postmodern propaganda against western institutions which have their basis in classical liberalism.

The Islamists, of course, just love the post-modernists since they are their sole ally in carrying out their victim politics. Sure the Israeli response to Hamas is very heavy-handed and results in considerable collateral damage, but why on earth should that keep Muslims from taking the trouble to be open to the Israeli argument? Hamas is not the least bit interested in a settlement and is the sole impediment, along with the mindset it represents, to a solution to this conflict.

Why on earth should Muslims wish the destruction of the only constructive people in the Middle East? What's keeping us from talking to the Israelis aside from an Arab equivalent of Lashkar e Taiba?

The Jews actually are the ones who mastered the victimhood mentality

 

[Wow]

BBC PLOWS JEWISH MIDGET WITH FACTS AND LOGIC