Yet another shrill rant of anti-Semite because facts fail you.
You brought up the Jewishness in Maher's criticism. I think Stormfront will be a better forum for you.
Wrong again.
The settlements are a secondary subject, compared to the central issue of Zionism's claim to Israel due to religion, and Maher fails to tackle that central tenet of Zionism.
Maher supports Israel's right to exist but not to occupy. If you had read any of his books, or watched his documentary or his TV show, you should know.
Other atheists, like Christopher Hitchens, have highlighted that central aspect of Jewish fundamentalism. The fact that Maher not only avoids that central issue, but supports Israel, destroys his credibility as a critic of religious extremism.
He criticized Jews in his movie. He is making a religious movie and not a political one.
YOU are the one who started shouting anti-Semite, only to be exposed as an imbecile who doesn't know the difference between ethnicity and religion, or the basics of Orthodox Jewish traditions.
Yet again you have lost the plot. You specifically brought up Maher's Jewish mother as a way of explaining why he criticizes Islam as to mean that all Jews hate Islam.
When faced with facts, all you could do was cover your ears and emit a shrill rant of "anti-Semite".
You have not presented not a single iota of fact. All you have done is constant rambling much to my amusement.
Readers can see your difficulty with English.
I agree with you that he is a liberal, not a libertarian.
The only difficulty I see in this thread is your lack of the basic facts. You didn't know the difference between liberal and libertarian.
The point I am making, which eludes your brain, is that Maher claims to be a libertarian. That is yet another of his claims which is phony, like his claim to be equally opposed to all religious extremism.
Maher claims to be a Liberal and not a Liberatarian.
Read that comment again before commenting. And let it process for 10 seconds before firing off another nonsensical response.
You claimed he was a libertarian, but he is not. You quoted the wrong name.
Rand Paul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"They thought all along that they could call me a libertarian and hang that label around my neck like an albatross, but I'm not a libertarian," Paul says.
TIME. Retrieved: 14 August 2014.
When Rand Paul said that he was much criticized for it as he had always claimed to be a Liberatarian. You just googled Rand Paul not Liberatarian and quickly found this quote and posted.
You are too mentally challeneged to understand the proper discourse in which said that statement.
Here read this and educate yourself, although I highly doubt that is possible in your case:
Shifting his views, Rand Paul seeks broader appeal — but may risk his outsider image - The Washington Post
If you are going to throw names around, at least have the intellect to research the name before quoting it. It will save you the embarrassment of looking like a fool.
Tsk Tsk...You are the fool who didn't know who Rand Paul was until I pointed it out to you.
It is his father, Ron Paul, who is the most vocal libertarian on the national stage.
Oh, it's clear all right, who has lost the plot long time ago.
Ron Paul has retired from Politics and thus his son Rand Paul carries the Liberatarian banner and thats why I mentioned Rand Paul and not Ron Paul.
But you clearly didn't know who Rand Paul was and thought it had something to do with Ayn Rand.
For someone who is suppose to be in a Think Tank, you don't do a lot of Thinking.
In any case I am done. I had my fun with you. I am sure you will respond because trolls like you have nothing better to do.
But don't worry I won't respond to humiliate you. I have already added you to the ignore list.
Have a nice troll filled life.
Now, go and type a ridiculous response to show the readers who intellectually backward you really are.
Ready
Go.