What's new

Beijing ‘tones down’ response after US warships sail through Taiwan Strait

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Beijing on Monday “expressed concern” after two US warships passed through the Taiwan Strait, but stopped short of lodging a “stern protest” as it has previously done over similar transits.

The two warships, the destroyers USS Stethem and USS William P. Lawrence,
sailed through the strait
on Sunday and Monday. According to a statement by Taiwan’s defence ministry, it was the seventh such voyage reported since the US Navy carried out a similar transit in July last year.
Asked about the warships, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said Beijing had “expressed concern” to Washington.



Geng reiterated that the US should handle the Taiwan issue “prudently” to avoid a negative impact on its relations with Beijing. The spokesman also repeated that “the Taiwan issue is the most important and sensitive issue in Sino-US relations”.

His response was low-key compared with previous foreign ministry reactions to vessels sailing through the strategic waterway. When the
French frigate Vendémiaire
made the journey through the Taiwan Strait early this month, the ministry said Beijing had lodged “stern representations” with Paris. It made a similar protest to Washington when the destroyer USS Curtis Wilbur and coastguard cutter Bertholf sailed through the strait in March.

Military experts said that in the latest transit, the two destroyers switched on their automatic identification systems – apparently a “friendly” gesture to allay Beijing’s concerns and show that they were carrying out a “freedom of navigation” operation.

Taiwan-based military analyst Chi Le-yi said Beijing had “toned down its criticism because the destroyers could be identified”.


“The US warships used to be less open, and they would not notify any countries about their movements,” Chi said.

Another military expert, Zhou Chenming, said both Beijing and Washington wanted to soften their rhetoric because trade talks between the two countries were close to the final stage.

But Drew Thompson, a former US defence department official responsible for managing relations with Beijing, Taipei and Mongolia, said that Washington would not use its military to send political signals to China.

“The role of US military is not like the People’s Liberation Army to be used in politics,” said Thompson, a visiting senior research fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.

He said the US Navy had made fewer transits through the Taiwan Strait in 2018 after a collision involving three American frigates two years ago.

“The frequency of strait transits had gone down last year, and now is backing down to historical levels … now the ships are returning to operations of norms,” Thompson said.


In Hong Kong, military commentator Song Zhongping said that Beijing would still regard such voyages as provocative moves aimed at challenging its one-China principle – Beijing’s position that the mainland and Taiwan belong to the same country.

“Everyone knows that the Taiwan Strait is very sensitive for Chinese people, and these kinds of transits will only embolden pro-independence forces on the island,” Song said.

Collin Koh, a research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, said the US destroyers’ transit would be broadly seen as a move “deliberately designed by Washington to demonstrate its freedom of navigation to mainland China”.

He said that was especially the case since it took place soon after Beijing’s strong response to the French warship sailing through the strait.

“Beijing seems to be taking a harder stance on transits through the strait – and we’re not likely to see the US backing down. I expect the US to keep up, if not increase, these naval activities to demonstrate its security commitment to the region,” he said.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/mil...-down-response-after-us-warships-sail-through

Its great to see the CCP finally accept normal and consistent US Naval operations in the Taiwan Strait!
 
. .
Military experts said that in the latest transit, the two destroyers switched on their automatic identification systems – apparently a “friendly” gesture to allay Beijing’s concerns and show that they were carrying out a “freedom of navigation” operation.

Taiwan-based military analyst Chi Le-yi said Beijing had “toned down its criticism because the destroyers could be identified”.


LMFAO cowards tucked their tail between legs after we lit them up with fire control radar
 
. .
Military experts said that in the latest transit, the two destroyers switched on their automatic identification systems – apparently a “friendly” gesture to allay Beijing’s concerns and show that they were carrying out a “freedom of navigation” operation.

Taiwan-based military analyst Chi Le-yi said Beijing had “toned down its criticism because the destroyers could be identified”.


LMFAO cowards tucked their tail between legs after we lit them up with fire control radar
This sums up everything
 
.
Military experts said that in the latest transit, the two destroyers switched on their automatic identification systems – apparently a “friendly” gesture to allay Beijing’s concerns and show that they were carrying out a “freedom of navigation” operation.

Taiwan-based military analyst Chi Le-yi said Beijing had “toned down its criticism because the destroyers could be identified”.


LMFAO cowards tucked their tail between legs after we lit them up with fire control radar

Hi,

Only assume that at your peril---.

America never offers conciliatroy gesture---unless there is an ulterior motive behind it---.
 
. . . . . . . .
Are you stupid or are you playing stupid? There can't be an "invasion" as the civil war has never ended.

The Chinese hit you so badly in Korea and Vietnam you still cry like a lil' biatch. :enjoy:

Din't China try twice to. "invade" taiwan and failed miserably?

Ahem...the Vietnamese are on the us side now......big time.

the Chinese hit "UN" forces badly? That's right sending human waves of peasants as cannon fodder was a "hit"

Ps: Vietnam kicked China's *** too... :)....
 
.
Din't China try twice to. "invade" taiwan and failed miserably?

Ahem...the Vietnamese are on the us side now......big time.

the Chinese hit "UN" forces badly? That's right sending human waves of peasants as cannon fodder was a "hit"

Ps: Vietnam kicked China's *** too... :)....
Ps: Vietnam kicked China's *** too... :)....
SURE, Vietnam KICKED the Paracel Islands and Johnson South Reef over to China.

Vietnam also KICKED Ai Nam Gate and Ban Gioc Waterfall over to China.
http://viettan.org/China-rift-opens-in-Vietnam.html

" To date, neither Hanoi nor Beijing has disclosed the exact details of the border agreement or a new official map. In a single interview with state media, a Vietnamese deputy foreign minister responsible for the negotiations downplayed Vietnam’s loss of major cultural landmarks, including the Ai Nam gate and the Ban Gioc waterfall.

China waiting for the US to KICK something over to China.
Kick over China Taiwan or World No.1 position??
.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom