Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont want to brag but back in college days I also did some soft drugs to kill the boredomMe too
Foreign-funded NGOs stalling development: IB report
TNN | Updated: Jun 12, 2014, 05:49 IST
NEW DELHI: An Intelligence Bureau report has accused "foreign-funded" NGOs such as Greenpeace, Cordaid, Amnesty and ActionAid of "serving as tools for foreign policy interests of western governments" by sponsoring agitations against nuclear and coal-fired power plants across the country.
The NGOs, said to be working through a network of local organizations such as PUCL and Narmada Bachao Andolan, have negatively impacted GDP growth by 2-3%, claims the IB report sent to the PMO and other government agencies.
Environmental activists joined Greenpeace in rubbishing the IB report. Greenpeace said it was a conscious attempt by the country's premier intelligence agency to crush and stifle opposing voices in civil society. The organization also wrote to the home minister, requesting him to share a copy of the report "to know and understand impacts of this labeling".
"It is disturbing to know that information of the IB report has been leaked to a media house and not been shared with the party concerned," said executive director of the Greenpeace India, Samit Aich, in his letter to the home minister.
As far as the source of funding is concerned, the NGO said, "Greenpeace India is funded by individual supporters in India. Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that does not accept any donation from corporate or government entities."
Environmentalist Ramesh Agrawal, who recently won the Goldman Environmental Prize for resisting destruction of forests by private mining companies in Chhatisgarh, said the report was an attempt to muzzle dissent. "I don't believe the IB report. Environmentalists working on the ground have always been branded as anti-development. At a time when global warming is threatening us and air pollution is the most serious public health problem, why is the government suppressing voices of dissent?" he asked.
The IB report — addressed to PMO, heads of joint intelligence committee and R&AW, national security council secretariat (NSCS), coal and power secretaries, home minister, finance minister and Cabinet secretary, and signed by IB joint director Safi A Rizvi — alleges that the "areas of action" of the foreign-funded NGOs include anti-nuclear, anti-coal and anti-Genetically Modified Organisms protests. Apart from stalling mega industrial projects including those floated by POSCO and Vedanta, these NGOs have also been working to the detriment of mining, dam and oil drilling projects in north-eastern India, it adds.
According to the report dated June 3, these foreign-funded NGOs are allegedly the influence behind "Praful Bidwais and Medha Patkars". The document, the details of which were accessed by TOI, accuses Greenpeace of having expanded its activities to oppose coal-fired power plants and coal mining and receiving Rs 45 crore from abroad in the last seven years.
"It is using foreign funds to create protest movements under 'Coal Network' umbrella at prominent coal block and coal-fired power plant locations in India," alleged the IB report.
Since 2013, Greenpeace has undertaken protests in five project-affected villages of Mahaan (in Madhya Pradesh) coal block allocated to Essar and Hindalco under the banner of Mahaan Sangarsh Samiti. Its activists have been targeting coal mining companies specifically Coal India Limited, Hindalco, Aditya Birla group and Essar as they "stand in their way", the report alleged.
"To encourage Indianness of its anti-coal approach, Greenpeace has financed a private research institute to study health, pollution and other aspects at Mahaan and plans to use the Mahaan case as a precursor for a ban on all coal blocks," it said.
The report has also raised questions over nearly $40,000 deposited in two bank accounts of S P Udayakumar, convenor of People's Movement against Nuclear Energy that has been at the forefront of the agitation against the Kudankulam nuclear project. The money was supposedly transferred by Ohio University for sending in resources and articles in the field of Kudankulam.
The report further alleges that six NGOs are at the forefront of anti-GM Food activism in India, with Germany being the main source of funds.
According to the report, future plans of the foreign-funded NGOs to take down fresh economic development projects include protests against palm oil imports, migration of workers to cities for construction work, campaign against disposal of e-waste generated by IT and Par Tapi-Narmada river interlinking in Gujarat and Maharashtra.
The future plans also include debunking the Gujarat model of development, special investment region in Gujarat and Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor, says the IB report.
Reacting to such allegations, senior campaigner of Greenpeace India Abhishek Pratap said, "Greenpeace India is an independent organization, which campaigns for development which is sustainable and growth that is inclusive - that is our understanding of 'sab ka saath sab ka vikas". How can this be a threat to national economic security"?
Pratap said, "We are clearly a threat to powerful corporate interests that seek to bulldoze clearances at the cost of millions of people and the environment".
He said, "We have a legitimate right to express our views in what is after all the world's largest democracy. We believe that this report is designed to muzzle and silence civil society who raise their voices against injustices to people and the environment by asking uncomfortable questions about the current model of growth."
Greenpeace also rubbished the allegation that it had funded Aam Admi Party (AAP) candidate Pankaj Singh, who contested from the Sidhi Lok Sabha seat in Madhya Pradesh. Said Greenpeace's Divya Raghunandan, "Pankaj was working with us before he joined AAP. He was a good activist working on the ground and in touch with the community. We lost a good hand to AAP. Greenpeace never supported his political activities."
Pankaj Singh told TOI: "It was my own decision to join AAP but that was only after I quit Greenpeace. I was working for Greenpeace as a consultant. I am a Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) graduate on community organization and development practices. So obviously my work has been focused on community forest rights."
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...evelopment-IB-report/articleshow/36411169.cms
Do you want more proof?Since you got so much to share and expose, let me give you free internet