i have not ridiculed anything. i believe in Geeta,vedas and not on some random article from Internet. In my religion cow is considered as mother and its prohibited to eat cow meat. and I will follow it. i am not going to make my own version of religion. I am going to follow which is passed down to me by my forefathers. you can have your own version but stop calling yourself Hindu after eating cow meat.
So you are still not capable on having a conversation based on what i wrote and still clinging on "you are not a hindu" because I dont follow the rules thing.
Do you know what is the english term for it?
Its called blasphemy. which is translated as " something said or done that is disrespectful to God or to something holy"
Ofcourse , in recent history , ever since the radicalised version s started appearing, has taken away a believer's right to be the questioner, the free thinker, the reformer, the iconoclast.
Arjuna questioned krishna, hence we got gita.
I believe in a single god, or ‘the single truth’ and hence your concept of ‘
blasphemy’ are hardly central to me.
Bans, diktats, insisting on a single interpretation and a single holy book are profoundly at odds with the dizzyingly varied Hindu inheritance, shaped crucially by individual choice.
The atma chooses his brahma and is therefore invincible. The individual shapes his religious universe, a
n unprecedented religious freedom that has made sanatana dharma unconquerable.
For me the essence of Hinduism is that it has no essence.
What defines Hinduism is its polycentricity, multiple centres of belief and practice…. Hinduism is a banyan tree… under which a great diversity of thought and action is sustained.
Hence your cheerleading jobs from what you acquired from internet or surroundings on the conduct of how i practise my religion hold no importance.
I believe the age has come when for the first time in sanatana dharma a few people have started using "blasphemy" as a tool to declare and give certificates for who Hindu is and who is not.
Brilliant!