beijingwalker
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 65,195
- Reaction score
- -55
- Country
- Location
Vietnam admitted those are Chinese territory and brazenly went back on own their words. how pathetic...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At this point, it is useless to bring any legal talk because neither sides will accept other side story of sovereignty. we can propose we have a war to settle this. If Vietnam beats us, they can take all of our islands possession in SCS. If they lose, we will take everything including the 27 features they occupied in Spratly.I am going to be banned because I am not trolling? Good...
It doesn't change the historical fact that it is Vietnamese territory.
I am aware of that, but using it as proving your point is laughable as it is Vietnamese territory and claiming otherwise is utter fallacy, that letter does not prove those islands are Chinese and you can claim otherwise and troll while one of your comrades lies about me and claims that I am trolling...
Well that is when Chinese suffer from confirmation bias, ultranationalists like the turks and the russians... Ignore the truth and make your own "truth", ignore the facts, create your own "facts"...
The paper mentions with no word recognition of Paracels, Spratlys nor SC sea. And of course, like Taiwan can't cede Hainan to Japan, North Vietnam can't cede the islands to China.Vietnam admitted those are Chinese territory and brazenly went back on own their words. how pathetic...
It doesn't matter anymore, my friend. You are not going to take our islands away from us without a war. Just as Japan will not hang back our Diaoyu to us without us going to war with them. So all these warning and argue back and forth mean nothing. At the end of the day, let the gun decided the real owner.The paper mentions with no word recognition of Paracels, Spratlys nor SC sea. And of course, like Taiwan can't cede Hainan to Japan, North Vietnam can't cede the islands to China.
If you put the dispute and your bias away for a while you will see by yourself that you are a shameless chinese clown. Such news will create more tensions and hate towards China.Penghu islands, Dongsha (Pratas) Islands, Xisha (Paracel) Islands, Zhongsha Islands (Macclesfield Bank), Nansha (Spratly) Islands and other islands that belongs to China.
First you said that paper is worthless and then you said it doesn't mean what it means. where is your logic?
Most of this world loves us and we don't really care if you hate us, Vietnamese hate everyone, hater's gonna hate.If you put the dispute and your bias away for a while you will see by yourself that you are a shameless chinese clown. Such news will create more tensions and hate towards China.
you certainly know such protests from VN are there as long as you insist on claiming 90 per cent of the SC Sea.It doesn't matter anymore, my friend. You are not going to take our islands away from us without a war. Just as Japan will not hang back our Diaoyu to us without us going to war with them. So all these warning and argue back and forth mean nothing. At the end of the day, let the gun decided the real owner.
after such aggression (and your created thread), china rating sinks further lower. but I believe you don´t care, do you?Most of this world loves us and we don't really care if you hate us, Vietnamese hate everyone, hater's gonna hate.
Most of this world loves us and we don't really care if you hate us, Vietnamese hate everyone, hater's gonna hate.
It is happening to all fishermen, be Chinese, Vietnamese, or Philipinos, by the other governments. The only difference so far is that Phikippine patrols open fire. I haven't heard any other countries' patrols open fire at other countries' fishermen.
The more Vietnam shifts to United States, The more Vietnamese interests in SCS will get hurted. Everything has a price. These Vietnamese fishermen simply paid the price for their government. When they grand-grandfather had the right to fish in SCS, their kings paid the price by paying tribute to Chinese emperors.
Both North Korea and Vietnam don't know why their ancient kings paid the tribute to Chinese emperors. It was not just for the security, but the access right to resources controlled by Chinese. The kings might lose some faces, but they gained interests for their people. North Korea and Vietnam are doing opposite. Their leaders gain some faces at the cost of their people.
Even Europe has to let USA to station armies. It is not alliances, but just a way to pay tributes. By paying tribues, Europe can access the interests worldwide controlled by USA.
China is much generous than USA, Russia and even India. All of them station armies in their tributaries countries. But this doesn't mean that North Korea and Vietnam can challenge Chinese core interests. Vietnam clearly has learned from 1979 war. If Vietnam keeps behaving like this, a SCS war between China and Vietnam may be possible, which may cause the sea blockade of Vietnam. Vietnamese boast of TPP can be simply ruined by a blockade.
Modern commerce are very sensitive. As long as China shows interests to blockade Vietnamese commercial ships, all TPP investments in Vietnam would run away overnight.
Unfortunately tributary system is viable today and is the only peaceful political sytem. Most countries live under Pan-America. Other countries pay tributes to China or Russia. Before the establishment of Pan-America, the world had two world wars within 30 years.Tribute is gift, briber money for normal diplomacy relation of past, no more.