Be prepared to deal with terror, Hindus urged

[daring dude]

PONDA: Predicting that terrorists from Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. would target Bharat (India), Paras Rajput of Hindu helpline in Mumbai has appealed to Indians to be prepared to fight terrorism.

Rajput also said that in such a situation Hindus would be more vulnerable as chances of getting government protection were bleak, adding that Hindu organizations must remain ready to deal with the situation. Rajput was addressing representatives of Hindu organizations' during the fourth day of the ongoing all India Hindu convention at Ramnathi temple hall in Ponda taluka on Monday.

Ramesh Shinde, national spokesperson of the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, stressed that the Hindus should perform spiritual practice and enhance their strength for the re-establishment of Dharma. Stating that Lord Shree Krishna is all set to reincarnate for the re-establishment of Dharma, he said it's a duty of every Hindu to participate in the mission. If performed emotionally, the mission will not be successful, therefore it should be performed as per the need of the times, he said.

"When holy places of Hindus are attacked, no reactions are witnessed. But as soon as Muslim community in Myanmar is attacked, its reactions are seen in Mumbai and Hindus are assaulted. Therefore, in order to prevent communal riots in the country Hindus should get trained in self-defence," said Sanjiv Punalekar, national secretary of Hindu Vidhidnya Parishad, who is also a lawyer by profession.

"If evildoers can unite, why not gentlemen," asked Vinod Kumar Sarvodaya, a businessman from Uttar Pradesh.

Arvind Pansare, spokesperson of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti in Maharashtra informed the gathering about the success achieved by them through the petitions filed by the samiti in Mumbai high court against the riot at Azad Maidan, Mumbai.

Earlier, Sunday evening, Rabindra Ghosh, a lawyer and president of the 'Bangladesh minority watch', informed the participants of the convention about the situation of Hindus and Hindutva in Bangladesh.

In 1947, there were 39% Hindus in Bangladesh, whereas the number has dwindled to a mere 9.46% today. Even after facing such atrocities, the Hindus are not willing to leave Bangladesh because they want to be part of an undivided Hindu nation, Ghosh added.

 

[Tshering22]

That's unfair. He didn't tell us to be prepared as well.

 

[Contrarian]

That's unfair. He didn't tell us to be prepared as well.

Since when did you become different from us. Why should there be a need to mention separately.

 

[Tshering22]

"When holy places of Hindus are attacked, no reactions are witnessed. But as soon as Muslim community in Myanmar is attacked, its reactions are seen in Mumbai and Hindus are assaulted. Therefore, in order to prevent communal riots in the country Hindus should get trained in self-defence," said Sanjiv Punalekar, national secretary of Hindu Vidhidnya Parishad, who is also a lawyer by profession.
"If evildoers can unite, why not gentlemen," asked Vinod Kumar Sarvodaya, a businessman from Uttar Pradesh.

Wonderfully put.

Also, when Myanmar riots happened, all northeastern Indians regardless of faith were targeted. Time to join forces and deal with jihadism.

 

[Screambowl]

It is always from that region.. it is very unstable , people don't know what they want.

 

[SrNair]

Congress and other sickular parties
psuedo secularism cause a lot of toll in Indian society.All communities irrespective of their religion suffered due to these morons.
They talk minority protection but dont give anything to poor people in minorities.
But they even completely forgot majorities both poor and others.
Now on we only trust in secularism shown by our Dharma.Our Dharma welcomed and protects different people and religions in this world.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Congress and other sickular parties
psuedo secularism cause a lot of toll in Indian society.All communities irrespective of their religion suffered due to these morons.
They talk minority protection but dont give anything to poor people in minorities.
But they even completely forgot majorities both poor and others.
Now on we only trust in secularism shown by our Dharma.Our Dharma welcomed and protects different people and religions in this world.

I really wish you would stop using jargon.

What I said in another context might be relevant here:


S********* is reflecting his own very individual – almost idiosyncratic – view of Indian history, society and politics. This view was in the minority among what he describes the ‘thinking classes’, it was the majority among the determinedly regressive groups of Hindu chauvinists who spent decades in the wilderness and built up a considerable bitterness about the persons and institutions that seemed to them to stand in their way, an apparent, perceived obstruction that they deemed illegitimate because they deemed the practices of those obstructive elements to be ‘alien’ and repressive of the true, Indian (=Indic) point of view. Note the inability to refer to any of the protagonists in normal terms; we always read the irritating term Gandhoo, never Gandhi; personal, individual ad hominem invective is here no longer abuse but a shorthand code for the long and liturgical arguments used, summed up, almost like a sutra, in a single filthy phrase. This is precisely the same way in which these groups use the word ‘sickular’; much of their discourse would be emasculated if these terms are not allowed.




There is no point in getting personal and, more than that, filthy about those who seem to stand in opposition to one’s point of view, but, as the Hindutva attitude to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi shows, somehow it is necessary to assault the personal lives and characters of their opponents to express the fullness of opposition to these opponents. An opposition not merely intellectual, but by now, in keeping with their beliefs, visceral as well. It is easy to recognise that their belief system is similarly inchoate and visceral as well, once one deconstructs their hostile statements.




While many liberals and democrats oppose what Nehru stood for, and do not agree with his policies and his administrative actions, that does not amount to the kind of hatred that is sought to be generalised by revisionists of the Hindutva school.

 

[AugenBlick]

I really wish you would stop using jargon.

What I said in another context might be relevant here:

S********* is reflecting his own very individual – almost idiosyncratic – view of Indian history, society and politics. This view was in the minority among what he describes the ‘thinking classes’, it was the majority among the determinedly regressive groups of Hindu chauvinists who spent decades in the wilderness and built up a considerable bitterness about the persons and institutions that seemed to them to stand in their way, an apparent, perceived obstruction that they deemed illegitimate because they deemed the practices of those obstructive elements to be ‘alien’ and repressive of the true, Indian (=Indic) point of view. Note the inability to refer to any of the protagonists in normal terms; we always read the irritating term Gandhoo, never Gandhi; personal, individual ad hominem invective is here no longer abuse but a shorthand code for the long and liturgical arguments used, summed up, almost like a sutra, in a single filthy phrase. This is precisely the same way in which these groups use the word ‘sickular’; much of their discourse would be emasculated if these terms are not allowed.


There is no point in getting personal and, more than that, filthy about those who seem to stand in opposition to one’s point of view, but, as the Hindutva attitude to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi shows, somehow it is necessary to assault the personal lives and characters of their opponents to express the fullness of opposition to these opponents. An opposition not merely intellectual, but by now, in keeping with their beliefs, visceral as well. It is easy to recognise that their belief system is similarly inchoate and visceral as well, once one deconstructs their hostile statements.


While many liberals and democrats oppose what Nehru stood for, and do not agree with his policies and his administrative actions, that does not amount to the kind of hatred that is sought to be generalised by revisionists of the Hindutva school.

TL;DR

All this idealistic bullc*ap does not change the facts from the article that
a) Hindus get treated like $hit, are the key targets of both Christian extremists and Islamists.
b)Everyone is up in arms about things that happen to Muslims but no one cares if for example in godhra pilgrims are burnt alive.
c)Genocide against hindus in BD, Pak and Kashmir and mass exodus of KP's who are refugees in their own country.
India is probably the only country in the world where the extreme left(That controls the media etc. ) and Islamists work together.
As an example our dearest former minister Salman khurshid goes to Azamgrah and says "Sonia G cried when she saws pic of Batla house youth"
In the last one year in Chennai 13 Hindu leaders have been killed , 4 BJP leader in UP after elections and many RSS leaders.

But congrats. with this crap, you can get a keynote in any western leftist university with a 2 day all expenses paid travel and also get your very own NGO.
Enjoy

 

[Scorpion666]

PONDA: Predicting that terrorists from Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. would target Bharat (India), Paras Rajput of Hindu helpline in Mumbai has appealed to Indians to be prepared to fight terrorism.

Rajput also said that in such a situation Hindus would be more vulnerable as chances of getting government protection were bleak, adding that Hindu organizations must remain ready to deal with the situation. Rajput was addressing representatives of Hindu organizations' during the fourth day of the ongoing all India Hindu convention at Ramnathi temple hall in Ponda taluka on Monday.

Ramesh Shinde, national spokesperson of the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, stressed that the Hindus should perform spiritual practice and enhance their strength for the re-establishment of Dharma. Stating that Lord Shree Krishna is all set to reincarnate for the re-establishment of Dharma, he said it's a duty of every Hindu to participate in the mission. If performed emotionally, the mission will not be successful, therefore it should be performed as per the need of the times, he said.

"When holy places of Hindus are attacked, no reactions are witnessed. But as soon as Muslim community in Myanmar is attacked, its reactions are seen in Mumbai and Hindus are assaulted. Therefore, in order to prevent communal riots in the country Hindus should get trained in self-defence," said Sanjiv Punalekar, national secretary of Hindu Vidhidnya Parishad, who is also a lawyer by profession.

"If evildoers can unite, why not gentlemen," asked Vinod Kumar Sarvodaya, a businessman from Uttar Pradesh.

Arvind Pansare, spokesperson of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti in Maharashtra informed the gathering about the success achieved by them through the petitions filed by the samiti in Mumbai high court against the riot at Azad Maidan, Mumbai.

Earlier, Sunday evening, Rabindra Ghosh, a lawyer and president of the 'Bangladesh minority watch', informed the participants of the convention about the situation of Hindus and Hindutva in Bangladesh.

In 1947, there were 39% Hindus in Bangladesh, whereas the number has dwindled to a mere 9.46% today. Even after facing such atrocities, the Hindus are not willing to leave Bangladesh because they want to be part of an undivided Hindu nation, Ghosh added.

No one tod me too !!! Am feeling left out ....
Do these dumb nit wits dream this sort of crap ??

 

[AugenBlick]

That's unfair. He didn't tell us to be prepared as well.

 

[SrNair]

I really wish you would stop using jargon.

What I said in another context might be relevant here:


S********* is reflecting his own very individual – almost idiosyncratic – view of Indian history, society and politics. This view was in the minority among what he describes the ‘thinking classes’, it was the majority among the determinedly regressive groups of Hindu chauvinists who spent decades in the wilderness and built up a considerable bitterness about the persons and institutions that seemed to them to stand in their way, an apparent, perceived obstruction that they deemed illegitimate because they deemed the practices of those obstructive elements to be ‘alien’ and repressive of the true, Indian (=Indic) point of view. Note the inability to refer to any of the protagonists in normal terms; we always read the irritating term Gandhoo, never Gandhi; personal, individual ad hominem invective is here no longer abuse but a shorthand code for the long and liturgical arguments used, summed up, almost like a sutra, in a single filthy phrase. This is precisely the same way in which these groups use the word ‘sickular’; much of their discourse would be emasculated if these terms are not allowed.




There is no point in getting personal and, more than that, filthy about those who seem to stand in opposition to one’s point of view, but, as the Hindutva attitude to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi shows, somehow it is necessary to assault the personal lives and characters of their opponents to express the fullness of opposition to these opponents. An opposition not merely intellectual, but by now, in keeping with their beliefs, visceral as well. It is easy to recognise that their belief system is similarly inchoate and visceral as well, once one deconstructs their hostile statements.




While many liberals and democrats oppose what Nehru stood for, and do not agree with his policies and his administrative actions, that does not amount to the kind of hatred that is sought to be generalised by revisionists of the Hindutva school.

I dont hate Nehru or his family.Well you must know
I really like Indira Gandhi even if she has some autocratic attitude I can rate her as the best PM India .She protected our country from lot of challenges.Jawarhlal Nehru best contribution is that he gave a stability to our nation as a democratic country.All that leaders including Rajiv Gandhi was always worked for our national even if they had some short comings.
They gave us a unity.But efficitivness of Congress partly vanished due to the death of Rajiv Gandhi.
One of worst mistake Congress did is that they prefer members from Nehru family more than any others.Inevitable result is that deztruction of the cadre system in Congress .Now you can see its result.
Except Shastri they dont give to any chance to any other leaders even if they had a lot of them.
Just after the death of the Rajiv Gandhi .Sitaram Kesari a good organizer and Congress man took the charge .But those who want the personal benefits from Congress enforce Sonia Gandhi to enter in to politics .
Just check the recent UPA rule.
Still I dont believe that Nehru family loot all that money .They dont need it .But there is some people in the inner circle of Congress needed that money.
But their another mistakeis that they continue all these even if they got sense of the changes of dynamics among Indians.


Congress is the party of Indian people not the private property of a family .They forgot these fundamental basics.
Earlier generations doesnt care this but present generations
youth is too sensitive to that.
In the name of secularism all other parties follow these same method.We saw the dramas of SP ,Congress for vote bank politics.No one is better not even BJP.
But they are the only one who proposes some creative about development.
Ensure development and education secularism will follow.
Secularism a noble word pronounced by Mahatma Gandhi now is degraded in to a lowest level for cheap votebank politics.
I dont believe all the stories propogated by Hindutvavadis.
But we know ancient Indian Kings always welcomef refugees and poor people of different religion in to our soil.
Like Zamorin/Samuthiri in Calicut who allow Arabs to settle
in our soil and gave them all facilities.That is also a secularism.
Our political parties mainly Congress dont stand for secularis m .If that was correct then our minorities could be a successful community a long time ago.Instead they are still
in poverty and illetracy.
Congress gave fertile soil for these fanatics .Shah Bano case is a best example.Loosening the security in Babri Masjid is also another example.
Sorry if you felt that was a personal attacks against Congress .But I dont meant it.

 

[Joe Shearer]

TL;DR

All this idealistic bullc*ap does not change the facts from the article that
a) Hindus get treated like $hit, are the key targets of both Christian extremists and Islamists.
b)Everyone is up in arms about things that happen to Muslims but no one cares if for example in godhra pilgrims are burnt alive.
c)Genocide against hindus in BD, Pak and Kashmir and mass exodus of KP's who are refugees in their own country.
India is probably the only country in the world where the extreme left(That controls the media etc. ) and Islamists work together.
As an example our dearest former minister Salman khurshid goes to Azamgrah and says "Sonia G cried when she saws pic of Batla house youth"
In the last one year in Chennai 13 Hindu leaders have been killed , 4 BJP leader in UP after elections and many RSS leaders.

But congrats. with this crap, you can get a keynote in any western leftist university with a 2 day all expenses paid travel and also get your very own NGO.
Enjoy

Christian extremists? The ones that burnt alive a man and his two small sons sleeping in their van? Or was it the ones who attacked churches and chapels? How many Hindus got killed by Christian extremists? How many Christians got killed by Hindu extremists? Want to do the numbers? Or is changing the text forbidden by the Parivar?

And congratulations - with this crap, you are on the way to being a Home Minister of your state - real soon now.

Enjoy.

 

[Reviewer21]

Time to join forces and deal with jihadism.

Starting with you

 

[StormShadow]

Christian extremists? The ones that burnt alive a man and his two small sons sleeping in their van? Or was it the ones who attacked churches and chapels? How many Hindus got killed by Christian extremists? How many Christians got killed by Hindu extremists? Want to do the numbers? Or is changing the text forbidden by the Parivar?

And congratulations - with this crap, you are on the way to being a Home Minister of your state - real soon now.

Enjoy.

Although whatever happened is regrettable, What were you expecting when missionaries resort to forcible conversions and insult other gods?

 

[amitkriit]

Christian extremists? The ones that burnt alive a man and his two small sons sleeping in their van? Or was it the ones who attacked churches and chapels? How many Hindus got killed by Christian extremists? How many Christians got killed by Hindu extremists? Want to do the numbers? Or is changing the text forbidden by the Parivar?

And congratulations - with this crap, you are on the way to being a Home Minister of your state - real soon now.

Enjoy.

Have you heard about Goan Inquisition where Hindus were skinned and boiled alive?
Ever heard the slogan "Nagalim for Christ" in Nagaland?
Ever heard them calling Hindus "Devil Worshippers"?
Ever heard about NLFT (Tripura) which has so far killed many HIndus who refused to convert to Christianity?

As far as that guy who got ***************************************************************