What's new

Featured BD not interested in US defence deal under Indo-Pacific strategy

Under the proposed Indo Pacific Strategy alliance, led by the United States, Bangladesh is not interested in purchasing arms, rather the country wants American investments in infrastructure.

"They want to sell arms, but we are not interested in issues related to conflict," foreign minister Dr AK Abdul Momen told the FE when asked about Bangladesh's stance on the IPS.

This message will be conveyed to the US deputy secretary of state Stephen Biegan as he kicks off his three-day Dhaka visit tomorrow (Wednesday).

Bangladesh feels that the IPS will be effective for the country if it gets US investments in infrastructure building under the strategy.

View attachment 678959

"We have no objection to the Indo Pacific strategy. But they should come forward to the infrastructure development if they want to make the IPS more effective".

"They have to spend money, only talking will not do, they have to invest," the minister said pointing out that the US has no contribution to Bangladesh's infrastructure development.

"They can do it if they want," he said defending his argument.

A recent move by the US to sell sophisticated defence equipment, including Apache helicopters, could not be materialised. US officials admitted that they had several rounds of talks with the authorities concerned on selling of sophisticated US defence equipment, which they claimed 'best in the world'.

According to a recent study by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, China is the fifth-biggest arms supplier in the world and also supplies most weapons to the region, except India, which is its regional rival

Around 35 per cent of China's arms supplies went to Pakistan between 2013 and 2017, followed by 19 per cent to Bangladesh.

Dhaka procured 71 per cent of its arms from China over the five-year period, and Myanmar 68 per cent.

In view of the growing influence of China in the region, the US and its allies launched the IPS, apparently to counter China's Belt and Rod Initiative (BRI).

Bangladesh has already become a major partner of BRI under which it will get over 25 billion US dollar for building infrastructure.

Recently, the USA has unleashed a fresh diplomatic offensive to revamp its ties with the regional countries, which have become partners of the China-led BRI.

Meanwhile, the visit of the US Deputy Secretary of State is considered part of that effort, analysts said.

Asked about the possible agenda, the minister admitted that IPS will be a major focus in the talks between Bangladeshi officials and Mr Biegun.

However, issues related to Rohingya, visa and Covid cooperation will also come up, he added.

"We'll discuss the Rohingya issue and we will make it clear that we are not interested in only humanitarian assistance, our main goal is repatriation, they must go back to that country," the minister said.

Dr Momen criticised the USA for not issuing visas to some Bangladeshi students, who secured I-20 from American institutions.

"They have not issued visas to Bangladeshi students who got I-20, but students of the neighbouring countries like India and Pakistan got the same category visas. This is discriminatory," he noted.

This is very discriminatory because Bangladesh's condition is better than other nations in terms of Covid control, impact is much lesser in the country, he argued.

"Still, they did not issue visas to our students, this is not good," he said.

"We also want support for our garment sector, which was affected by Covid," the minister said.

For example, the U.S. can offer the garments sector three years' moratorium on duty to enable the country to absorb the shock from Covid, he added.


Government unwilling to engage in int’l rivalries: FM

The Bangladesh government is unwilling to engage in rivalries among powerful countries at both international and regional levels, foreign minister AK Abdul Momen said on Monday.

‘We don’t want to engage in rivalries,’ the minister told reporters at his office in view of the move of four countries for expediting the Indo-Pacific Strategy and a scheduled visit of a US deputy secretary to Bangladesh.

On elements of the Indo-Pacific Strategy, propagated by the United States with participation of India, Japan and Australia, Momen said that Bangladesh was interested only in development aspect of the IPS.

‘They have to come up with infrastructure development. They have to invest money. Only talking would not do,’ he said.

US deputy secretary of state Stephen E Biegun is scheduled to reach Dhaka on a three-day official visit today to discuss the Indo-Pacific Strategy among other issues.

Stephen is scheduled to hold bilateral talks with his Bangladesh counterpart, state minister for foreign affairs M Shahriar Alam, tomorrow.

He would call on prime minister Sheikh Hasina and foreign minister AK Abdul Momen on Thursday.

The Indo-Pacific Strategy, trade, including US defence articles’ sales, and COVID-19 pandemic are likely to be in the US agenda, while the Bangladesh side may prefer to talk on attracting US investment and getting greater market access and technical know-how for agriculture, according to diplomatic sources on both sides.

‘They [US] want to sell defence articles,’ the foreign minister said.

They could extend a moratorium on duties on imports from Bangladesh, including RMG products, for three years, he said.

The minister also stressed the need for an end to visa discrimination by the US for Bangladeshi students.

Indian and Pakistani students are getting US visas, while Bangladeshi students are kept waiting for long in spite of confirmation of their admission to US educational institutions, he added.

Stephen was scheduled to reach New Delhi on Monday, starting his five-day tour in India and Bangladesh.

‘It is understandable that the focus of his visit is India,’ a senior Bangladesh official said, indicating to the US presidential elections that will take place in three weeks.

Bangladesh is at risk of becoming a party to international and regional rivalry unless the country maintains a neutral position, keeping strategic affairs and national interests in consideration amid the growing rivalries among countries like India, China, the United States, Australia and Japan, Bangladeshi foreign policy and defence analysts believe.

The great Bengali nation.
 
Cowboy talk is not exactly known as making a plea. So them listeing or not is not even a consideration. They need to be told what to do and shoved down their throats.

The truth is both China and USA want to exploit the Rohingya issue and try to get Burma on their side. None of these two powers have any interest in solving it for us because there is no benefit in it for them.

USA is willing to impose Security Council based sanctions. China has vetoed the sanctions
How hard is it to face the music ?
 
Long story short Bangladesh made a great decision not joining on the American side to go against China.

It's good to stay neutral and benefit from both of them , if America cared about the Royinga situation they would of already solved it.

America's end goal is to stop the CCP ( which is ok ) and also make India weak in the process.

Bangladesh should be like Switzerland and watch everything go downhill while it grows.

No one was truly neutral during the cold war, countries claimed neutrality publicly but we know from declassified documents that 'neutrality' was just a facade. For Bangladesh it is a relatively simple choice, China is next door so Bangladesh should not antagonize China.
Plus, the foreign minister Dr AK Abdul Momen is incorrectly assuming the US government can direct FDIs into Bangladesh.
The US has no CPEC or Belt and Road initiative and exercises no control over private investments.
Current air defense is NO answer for these type of Loitering munition.


You are poorly informed, Its easy to neutralize loitering munitions you can buy gear online and build a direct energy device or jammer in your garage. Fully autonomous hardened loitering munitions will be more of challenge but those aren't a concern for Bangladesh at this time.
 
Last edited:
USA is willing to impose Security Council based sanctions. China has vetoed the sanctions
How hard is it to face the music ?

USA did nothing apart from trying to impose the sanctions which they knew wouldn't succeed. But like they do all over the world, they don't need to rely on security council sanctions. They can do their own thing.
 
USA did nothing apart from trying to impose the sanctions which they knew wouldn't succeed. But like they do all over the world, they don't need to rely on security council sanctions. They can do their own thing.

UN Security Council resolutions can be used as the basis to prod the ASEAN states. For starters Malaysia and Indonesia (Muslim states) do business with Myanmar. For what is worth it did expose China's support for Myanmar.
 
UN Security Council resolutions can be used as the basis to prod the ASEAN states. For starters Malaysia and Indonesia (Muslim states) do business with Myanmar. For what is worth it did expose China's support for Myanmar.

Even without security council resolution the US can influence the ASEAN states. Even without the the ASEAN states the US can single handedly resolve the Rohingya issue. If they can't, then the USA is useless for us anyway to solve the rohingya issue.
 
You are poorly informed,

Ok, how? be specific.

Fully autonomous hardened loitering munitions will be more of challenge

Video I posted has multiple launchers in a single system, are one such platform, where few of these can fill the sky with hundreds of autonomous loitering munitions.

Its easy to neutralize loitering munitions you can buy gear online and build a direct energy device or jammer in your garage.

Have you built one in your garage which can take down hundreds of autonomous loitering munitions?? Or it is just big talk?? If you know garage-built such system exists, please do share, I am sure lots of people would be interested.

but those aren't a concern for Bangladesh at this time.
How did you decide, this is not a concern for Bangladesh at this time?
If you are really "professional" you should know better that ignoring a potential threat only will come back to haunt, specially in Bangladesh neighborhood. Besides, procuring, learning, mastering a system, and integrating into plan, which is fairly new to the force, will takes lot of time.

Given such systems are produced by China, it will most likely reach in the hand Myanmar genocidal army (which often threaten Bangladesh border), sooner than later. Please educate us how "not at this time" will work then??
 
Ok, how? be specific.



Video I posted has multiple launchers in a single system, are one such platform, where few of these can fill the sky with hundreds of autonomous loitering munitions.

Doesn't matter if you can jam the receivers - jamming one or a thousand is just a matter of jamming the right frequencies.

Making a jammer in your garage

For autonomous drones you need EMP, the Chinese haven't yet made a INS small enough to fit on a small drone so you can still jam the drones GPS receiver - à la RQ170 that Iran took down some years ago.

Making a EMP in your garage

Given such systems are produced by China, it will most likely reach in the hand Myanmar genocidal army (which often threaten Bangladesh border), sooner than later. Please educate us how "not at this time" will work then??

You really think China will sell Myanmar fully autonomous AI powered drones any time soon :lol:
...and hence my assertion that fully autonomous drones aren't an immediate threat to Bangladesh.

Making a noise jammer and EMP is well within the reach of engineers in Bangladesh.

Don't know why you responded with so much venom, my apologies if I said something to offend you.
 
Last edited:
No one was truly neutral during the cold war, countries claimed neutrality publicly but we know from declassified documents that 'neutrality' was just a facade. For Bangladesh it is a relatively simple choice, China is next door so Bangladesh should not antagonize China.
Plus, the foreign minister Dr AK Abdul Momen is incorrectly assuming the US government can direct FDIs into Bangladesh.
The US has no CPEC or Belt and Road initiative and exercises no control over private investments.

The primary request to the US administration was about extending GSP and removing tariffs on Bangladeshi exports to the US.

Which will help a lot.
 
Doesn't matter if you can jam the receivers - jamming one or a thousand is just a matter of jamming the right frequencies.

Making a jammer in your garage

For autonomous drones you need EMP, the Chinese haven't yet made a INS small enough to fit on a small drone so you can still jam the drones GPS receiver - à la RQ170 that Iran took down some years ago.

Making a EMP in your garage



You really think China will sell Myanmar fully autonomous AI powered drones any time soon :lol:
...and hence my assertion that fully autonomous drones aren't an immediate threat to Bangladesh.

Making a noise jammer and EMP is well within the reach of engineers in Bangladesh.

Don't know why you responded with so much venom, my apologies if I said something to offend you.

Youtube wanna be and functional professional grade thing are two different things. And you avoided answering questions that were posed. If you dont have answer that is ok but next time think before making loose statements as you did.
 
Youtube wanna be and functional professional grade thing are two different things. And you avoided answering questions that were posed. If you dont have answer that is ok but next time think before making loose statements as you did.

Not really the theory is the same.. a noise jammer is easy to make, you simply have to broadcast continuously over a known range of frequencies.

Here is an example of of a wearable solution capable of jamming a UAS swarm with a range of 1 kilometer.

Pitbull.jpg



DRONE SWARMS ARE A CONCERN IN THE MILITARY DOMAIN AND IT HAS BEEN A PRIORITY FOR US TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE SOLUTION TO COMBAT MULTIPLE DRONES FOR BOTH DISMOUNTED SOLDIERS AND IN FIXED INSTALLATIONS. WITH THE WINGMAN AND PITBULL SETUP, WE HAVE DEMONSTRATED JUST THAT, AND THE SYSTEM WILL BE ABLE TO DEFEAT COUNTLESS DRONES SIMULTANEOUSLY,” SAYS CHRISTIAN STEINØ, CEO OF MYDEFENCE.


Your choice if you want to continue to believe countering a UAS swarm is impossible for Bangladesh.
The primary request to the US administration was about extending GSP and removing tariffs on Bangladeshi exports to the US.

Which will help a lot.

It should not be a problem, there isn't any public opposition to preferential status being extended for Bangladesh.
 
Last edited:
Excuse me - are you suggesting USA does not have an arms embargo on Myanmar ?

I don't see any. You are welcome to prove me wrong with proof.

I could care less what Bangladesh does with China. Do not complain to do more about the Rohaniyas while you want to happily do business with the primary backers of the butchers of Rohaniyas. How hard is it for you to comprehend ?
Let us get one thing clear. The biggest supporter of Myanmar is China. They cast the veto on economic sanctions.
I doubt the Myanmar junta will listen. they have been a reclusive bunch for a long time.

Thank you for admitting that the west can't do anything alone to solve Rohingya issue. You are not that interested. Even if we do take your side it will be totally fruitless cause you won't do anything except selling us your weapons. Of course we will complain.

Your money is being spent to feed these rats, you are the one who wants them to stay here for 10 more years and don't want us to relocate them to Bhashan-Char. You put your nose in this so you will get complaints. So suck it up.

Its easy to neutralize loitering munitions you can buy gear online and build a direct energy device or jammer in your garage. Fully autonomous hardened loitering munitions will be more of challenge but those aren't a concern for Bangladesh at this time.

Bangladesh army already has jammer from Thales, now army is buying man-portable ECM. Anyway isn't C-RAM capable of taking out these drones?

Don't know why you responded with so much venom, my apologies if I said something to offend you.

He always does that whoever disagrees with him. Careful with that girl. She suddenly fell in love with drone tech.
 
Last edited:
Friendly advice from Pakistan, learn from our collective mistakes of joining CENTO, SEATO in the 50's and stay away from an alliance which pits BD against a regional country like China.

Really zero chance....
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom