What's new

BD creation was Indian national objective & US had to preserve WP-Kissinger

Sunday, March 18, 2012



Kissinger also laid another Cold War ghost to rest. White House tapes of the Nixon presidency declassified in 2005 reveal the former Secretary of state used unparliamentary language while referring to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, the India Today report said. The declassified tapes reveal Nixon calling then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi an “old witch” and Kissinger agreeing with that assessment.

“I was under pressure and made those comments in the heat of the moment. People took those remarks out of context,” Kissinger said, adding that he had the highest regard for Indira Gandhi.



BAZINGA

OH YEAH RIGHT ..:D
 
.
1.What shall we deduce?

a. Firstly, USA did not (and does not) want the destruction of (W) Pakistan simply because that would amount to loosing a good customer. In fact two - that is, including India, which is a far bigger client of arms and aid.

b. Being a Zionist baby doll and an agent of the Neo Cons, Kissinger has to is trying to encourage India into a conflict with China.

2. USA is totally under the Zionist monopoly which looks for profit everywhere - from fining citizens right and left to prosecuting wars and causing famine or destruction.
 
. .
But yeah pakistanis dont quite understand, they owe their countries integrity to america. So every time they say pakistan zindabad it should be followed by thank you america, thank you nixon.
Indira wanted to get the eastern cores to break the back of the already crumbling Western defences, Nixon threatened war if west pakistan was pushed beyond a certain point.
So yeah, say thank you to america.

What a silly comment, you think Pakistan would have treated you the same way Bangladesh did? We could and we did defend our borders on this side. We could have turned 1971 into something else had we changed our immoral behaviour and given Bangladesh her rights.
 
.
What a silly comment, you think Pakistan would have treated you the same way Bangladesh did? We could and we did defend our borders on this side. We could have turned 1971 into something else had we changed our immoral behaviour and given Bangladesh her rights.

why was the world so impressed with india in 71 war? was it because of what happened in east pak? maybe.

but also because of what happened in west pak. the indian troops in the west were ordered to hold territory. not only did they achieve that, they also captured Wpak territory despite being outnumbered. that almost never happens in warfare
 
.
Hey guys, it's 2012! World is going to end! Why still talk about some decades old war? Let's move on! Stop posting such threads. People didn't show much interest when I opened a thread to talk about BD's future or when Zab opened one to discuss ways to develop BD faster. So disappointed..

Quality threads should be requested to make sticky. Fight instigating threads shouldn't stay on the first page for long.
 
. .


the most brainless media of the world

its so funny :rofl::rofl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Back
Top Bottom