BBC World report on UP police terror brutality against Muslims Community.

[undercover JIX]

https://www.facebook.com/

 

[undercover JIX]

https://www.facebook.com/

 

[YeBeWarned]

Modi-Fied India

 

[flameboard]

Madi has turned Made In India into Rape in India

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Only if all the Muslims in the sub-continent were little more united and bolder in 1946 things would have been different!!! And, only if Jinnah were their only leader....

When Gandhi asked Indians not to join the British Army during WW2 at their worst position vis-à-vis the Germans, Jinnah asked the Muslim youth to join the British Army as many as possible!!! He said, "a known enemy is better than an unknown friend"!!! He did that for a couple of reasons. First, he wanted the Muslim youth to be trained as professional soldiers by the British, and whipped to be the war veterans. Second, he knew the Axis power would fail the way they did in WW1. It's a matter of logistics, ideology etc. Third, he could negotiate with the British (+US) establishment to have say on the final arrangement vis-à-vis the British India

For a reason Jinnah repeatedly asked the British he was the sole "spokesperson" for the Muslims in the sub-continent. Those bastards like Maulana Azad, Madani etc. torpedoed his position. Nevertheless, he could negotiate Pak out!!! How much he could have achieved if those bastards had kept quiet!!!! The entire British India would have faced the Civil War like situation with armed cadres on the both sides!!! And, consider that the Cold War had already started with the Soviets across Afghanistan!! Russians are good at geo-politics whether you like it or not!!! They helped the Turkish War of Independence. The British + USA would have never allowed a Muslim resurgence in the sub-continent, and that too with the Russians help. As such, Jinnah would have got what he wanted

The first job of the Indian Muslims now is to take out the skeletons of those sold-out traitor bastards like Azad and Madani from their hell holes and hang them in public​

 

[masterchief_mirza]

About time. But still, such news needs to be on BBC proper so Englishmen can take a long hard look at themselves and realise who these sanghi animals really are. A world service report is not good enough BBC!

Dear Hindutva apologist scum on pdf. You know who the fk you are. You routinely fight with me until your inferiority complexes lay fully exposed, so don't be afraid to respond. Come now you ugly bstrds and answer one question.

When the Muslims who have been abused by your government finally retaliate and blow some of you bstards up or catch hold of some khaki sanghi and dismember him while he screams for bhagwan, do tell me, will you accept that this event will occur in RETALIATION for these present brutalities,?

Or will you cry to the media "hai hai, the Muslims started it, the Muslims started it".

We know how you bstards bullshitted the world over Gujarat - Muslims retaliated for the murders at ayodhya but you sick sanghees claimed Muslims started it with an attack on a train.

We know your forefathers started it in 1947 when you pogromed in Jammu. Yet you cried about "tribals, tribals, tribals".

You fkers will suffer for each of these civilians who is enduring this abject misery.

The worst thing about you Hindutva filth - again you know who you are - is that you don't even once state that this is wrong. If such things happened in Pakistan, every sane member here would rally in support of oppressed minorities and condemn the acts of brutality against them. Yet all we hear over such things in India is a wall of silent apathy, with very few exceptions - the exceptions are noteworthy , but they are few.

So come. Now is your chance. Prove me wrong. Or confirm what I already know.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

"The fact is that 19 people have died in one of India's largest states. Somebody has to answer to their families. We are a democracy and the cost of protest cannot be death," a Hindu social activist in India.

Excuse my rhetorical questioning but does no Indian on pdf share this view, or do you remain silent, accepting these deaths as part of Modi's grand scheme for Hindustan? How would such deaths in HK be received by the world's media?

To Indian Muslims - please be under no illusions that the Western world will come and save you. Hitherto you were magical Indians, Bollywood, yoga, hijabis with purple ink on their thumbs on election day which apparently makes India and Hindus very very awesome and magical, democrassheee, and all that stomach churning excrement we have to endure out here. They loved that you called yourselves indian, unlike us terrible folk over the other side of the ceasefire line who dared to say sorry, no thanks, we won't live in a Hindu state. The west now sees you as Muslim scum, not Bollywood. You were living a fraudulent life, an illusion of sorts.

The coverage of the state led religious cleansing and obvious police and RSS citizen-led brutality is minimal and despite this situation on the ground clearly being akin to Nazi Germany in the 1930's, white people just don't care, or possibly even support it without saying so.

The police were interviewed in detail by the BBC. When questioned about media evidence being used to support the retaliatory "idf-style" home trashing, the punitive arrest of male householders, and other such glorious democratic methodologies of crowd control, the UP police simply said they used "digital evidence". Now when the question over the same standard of evidence being used to identify police deliberately targeting civilians with bullets and without any cause for self-defence was put to the same UP police official, his response was that such evidence cannot be used against police as it is "out of context". I'm not linking to this particular article because it is overall a biased heavily edited by sanghi sympathisers piece of nonsense that virtually blames unarmed civilians for police officers picking them off with live ammunition.

When such a thing happened in NI, it was called "bloody Sunday" and the British state has been under investigation ever since. It was widely accepted as a justification for inevitable IRA retaliation. When such a thing happened in Beijing the media called it the Tiananmen square "massacre" and analysed it from every angle imaginable, causing its discussion at the UN security council, ultimately forcing profound changes in Chinese politics and society in general. It happens today in Kashmir and Delhi - and Hindu Indian editorial boards write it off as a "violent protest" with "some heavy-handedness" in response.

You folks need to understand how the media works in terms of language. The editors mitigate, obfuscate, and redistribute blame as they see fit. They're not on your side unless and until they call a massacre out as a massacre. For now, they're just victim-blaming scum under the influence of partisan forces.

Meanwhile, what an amateurish bunch these Indians are. They're performing as per the most basic of scripts, performing a very simple eradication of Muslims. Yet how can they get away with such a basic plan?? It's simple really dear Indian Muslims - nobody will stop them.

This is basic nazi terror. It's not even cunning or clever.

The Western media will never call this a "massacre", which is what it now essentially has become. Indian Muslims must not allow themselves to fall for this illusion that somehow such brutality is normal and acceptable.

 

[El Sidd]

Uttar Pradesh is filled with mass graves