BBC story on 'Pakistan's secret human rights abuses' a pack of lies: ISPR

[Verve]

War with out causalities is not possible. Collateral damage springs to the mind and mistakes and accidents do happen and one have to look at the bigger picture. When TTP killed our 70 000 innocent people BBC forgot ours near and dears humans rights and value of life. Army have brought down the terrorist attacks to virtually handful and we are enjoying some resemblance of peace. So please carry on the good work and hopefully mistakes can be minimised for the future operations. Our nation craves for peace and prosperity so if that's the price for the peace then so be it. Before western countries point fingers at us look at their forces conduct of war in recent operations.

BBC will never write about the US Drones wiping families upon families out. Collateral damage by US bombs is holy.

 

[Cthulhu]

There's a pattern to the BBC, Wherever that the genocidals want to make trouble, The BBC is the first that is on the ground.

 

[Numerous]

And why is it so easy for you to believe someone claiming that army killed their relatives?

We have policemen robbing people, and terrorists wearing army uniforms killing civilians. We have seen fake videos of terrorists wearing fake PA clothing killing people. Yet you believe a story without any verification and posting about it as some sort of gospel.

Well because it's conceivable to believe that people may have been accidentally killed in an air strike. These things happen in war. So whilst I cannot say that's true, it's not unbelievable either.

The issue of missing persons though. That's very believable. Too many people from all over Pakistan regularly accuse security forces of that. There's too many cases of that for me to call that western propaganda.

All the same, like I said, let's investigate these things properly and we shall find out the truth insha'Allah.

 

[El Sidd]

British Airways arrival coincided with this BBC article.


#JustSaying

 

[Crusher]

There's a pattern to the BBC, Wherever that the genocidals want to make trouble, The BBC is the first that is on the ground.

BBC is the most notorious channel in the world, it always airs negative news and documentaries about other countries and ethnicites. But you will never see them airing any negative documentary about Britain itself, you will never see them airing any documentary about acid attacks carried out by white british/english supremacists on the foreigners in england which is a regular occurrence in the last few years.

 

[Verve]

Well because it's conceivable to believe that people may have been accidentally killed in an air strike. These things happen in war. So whilst I cannot say that's true, it's not unbelievable either.

The issue of missing persons though. That's very believable. Too many people from all over Pakistan regularly accuse security forces of that. There's too many cases of that for me to call that western propaganda.

All the same, like I said, let's investigate these things properly and we shall find out the truth insha'Allah.

Everything eventually becomes believable if it's repeated again and again.

We are in a state of war and have been for most part of our existence. And wars are not beds of rose petals.

 

[El Sidd]

BBC will never write about the US Drones wiping families upon families out. Collateral damage by US bombs is holy.

the government has not uttered a word though. her silence bought by corrupt practices which lead to British Airways arrival.

maybe

 

[Numerous]

Really, 60 years? Evidence?

Baloch insurgency sponsorship by USSR and India was the start of it.

Go ask Najam Sethi ...

Do you really need evidence from for me? They've been there from pretty much day 1, the insurgency hasn't ended, it just goes through stages of low violence and high violence. Sure sometimes they lose fighters and tribes due to peace deals, at other times they gain fighters.

Everything eventually becomes believable if it's repeated again and again.

We are in a state of war and have been for most part of our existence. And wars are not beds of rose petals.

If people from all over Pakistan are complaining about something - it's because there is actually a problem. This missing persons thing is no lie.

Being in a war does not mean that we start committing crimes against our own people. That is a very poor excuse and something many westerners say to defend their own nation's crimes. We are not westerners, we have values and principles.

Bro don't think bad of anyone but my view that we need to investigate things is one I think which is fair and one we can probably both agree with.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

fifth generation war . international media is a major part of it .

 

[American Pakistani]

These western newspaper have nothing better to do other than posting propaganda against Pakistan, China, etc etc, while they failed to see indian state sponsored terrorism in IOK.

 

[Mrc]

Ban VOA urdu pashto and BBC urdu pashto in Pakistan

 

[Fracker]

Pakistan is facing insurgency from the independence Day . Our enemies using Pakistanis to do their dirty work. And when defending Pakistan there can be mistakes happened. Here I am not blaming anyone but we should atleast take care of those who got effected in process.

So far BBC, Fox, or CNN concern media is being used against Muslims since times of hazrat Ali Ra and ameer Mavia Ra . They are using this to spread misinformation within Muslims like Qur'an says they will not be happy untill they change your religion. So talking about them is useless.

But we should have to clear our back yard. And I know many blochis who has nothing to with insurgency. They are suffering from three sides, security, insurgents and weather. They need our help as humans as Muslims and as Pakistanis

 

[nahtanbob]

Sorry but your opinion is nonsense and based on conjecture just like the article. M Ilyas Khan is a paid shill. He has absolute and eternal form in maligning any state initiative in Pak or any military manoeuvre in the slightest. He also maligns any defensive posture against India and fails to acknowledge cause and effect whenever he sees an opportunity to criticise the state or military, regardless of context. His most recent article proudly declared that "Pakistan's decision to ban Indian movies will backfire" in the post Balakot tension. What a bizarre position to adopt, given that India FIRST banned our artists and we simply responded to that. His only objective is to attack Pakistani decisions, reputation and interests, even when CLEARLY India began a given sequence of tit for tats. If you bother to follow the audit trail, the authors name etc, you will soon realise who these hacks are in western media and you can easily predict the author's name the second you read the headline.

M Ilyas Khan WANTS Pak to fail, probably because such journalism will attract the highest salary out here in the west. So treat his words with caution. I'm not denying that civilians may have been inadvertently hit by Pak military. I'm not so idiotic, but this guy's motives are heavily biased.

was your 1971 war propaganda too ?
shooting the messenger is not going to make problems disappear

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

BBC should be completely banned for being a SPY mouth piece

 

[khail007]

In the world's history, union jack is responsible for savagery and atrocities, and still people are suffering from the deliberately mischievous divides they left behind. Now these wicked and satanic brains are playing innocents and pointing fingers on others. Just look at these liars role in Gulf conflict. After loosing their satanic throne to USA now just serving on 'TC' pay to USA.
The sudden birth of PTM and soon after the 'human rights abuse' propaganda against Pakistan armed forces is not just a coincidence.
BBC just needs to pay attention to the savage Britain history of human rights abuses and straight out the record of these so called innocent champions of 'human rights'.
Just a piece of advise for those confused dual nationals who never knew the dark side of British history, just go beyond what they study to pass a history/cultural test for qualifying to have a UK passport.