@
ajtr do u have trouble comprehending English??? I want to reply to ur last post but wonder if u will read it rationally or not, Anyways, a last try.................
longewala 120 well entrenched men of IA delayed PA advance till morning even when numbers and equipment were in favour of PA.
PA strength = 2800 + 65 tanks
while IA strength = 120 + 1 Anti tank vehicle
Simple Maths - There were 23+ PA soldiers for every IA soldier not to mention the unopposed tank superiority enjoyed by PA.
NOW, what great entrenchment did IA employed that stopped 2800 PA soldiers from killing just 120 IA soldiers for six complete hours???
I mean both were on same ground, seeing eye to eye.
26/11- 8 men well entrenched in taj and oberoi hotels and chabbad house held on against whole mumbai police, IA,NSG,MARCOS for almost 3 days.
It was not possible to just kill the terrorists for the Indian forces, they were holding there positions for 3 days b'coz:
1. Indian forces priority was to save human life while terrorists were hiding behind civilians, India is not SL such that we don't kill our own people.
2. Surprise factor, such that for 1st day or so it was the fight b/w fully trained terrorists to that of Mumbai police.
3. There are more than 550 rooms in both Trident & Taj hotels, & NSG had to secure each & every room, thus unlike longewala enemy was taking human & infrastructure shield.
Kargil-NLI men were so well entrenched that it took whole might of IA and IAF to clear them in almost 3 months.
As i said earlier they were on high grounds easily targeting Indian positions + neither IA nor IAF's whole might was employed for Kargil.
Again can't compare to Longewalla since this time enemy was placed in strategically superior position.
Now do you see the similarities.
The only similarity i see are the words "well entranched" put in place only to prove ur fundamentally flawed point Right, oh & u have Bold it also, thanks otherwise i would not have seen it