What's new

Battle of Ain Jalat I 1260 - Battle that stopped Mongols

dexter

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
6,111
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

“All empires over-reach and inevitably decline. That moment came for the Mongols in 1260 at the Battle of Ayn Jalut.”

AT THE PEAK
of their power, the Mongols controlled the largest land-based empire in history, coming only second to Victorian Britain’s in overall size. In the 13th Century, a person could travel from the edge of Poland all the way to Korea and might never leave Mongol territory. Yet all empires inevitably over-reach and then decline. That moment came for the Mongols in 1260 at the Battle of Ayn Jalut (in modern-day Israel.)

The Mongols began their conquest of the Middle East in 1258 when Baghdad, the cultural epicentre and capital of the Abbasid Caliphate, fell in an orgy of violence. Conservative estimates of the sacking of the city put the death toll at 200,000. Along with slaughtering the inhabitants, the invaders also destroyed Baghdad’s mosques and libraries, including the storied House of Wisdom. Eyewitnesses said that when the pillaging was over, the Tigris River ran black from the ink of books that were dumped into the water. By erasing centuries of learning, the Mongols were clearly trying to destroy all elements of Muslim rule in the Middle East.

With capital of the caliphate in ruins, the only power in the region left to counter the invaders were the Mamelukes.

The legendary slave warriors, who had been bought as Christian boys from the Caucasus, converted to Islam and then trained to fight as an elite mounted corps, were every bit as fierce and skilled cavalry as the Mongols. Just a few years earlier, the Mamelukes had overthrown their masters and established their own empire that stretched from Egypt into the Middle East. Most recently they had been attacking what few lands the Christians still had under the banner of the Crusader states.

While the Mongols were an existential threat to the Mamelukes, they were equally feared by the Christians. The invaders had already annihilated armies in Russia, Poland and Hungary a generation earlier. And with the Mongols continuing their march westward, the unthinkable was about to happen: a truce between Christian and Muslim.

In 1260, the Crusader states granted the Mameluke army safe passage through their territory to intercept the Mongols. It was a case of “my enemy’s enemy is an even greater enemy.”

The two sides met on Sept. 3 of that year at Ayn Jalut or “the Spring of Goliath,” named for the infamous giant from the Old Testament.

Exactly how many troops were in action there is unknown, but as the Mongols divided their massive army into units of 10,000 to 12,000 mounted warriors called Tumens. At least one Tumen fought at Ayn Jalut, which likely represented a small detachment of the main Mongol army. The Mamelukes fielded considerably more troops – as many as 20,000.



By all accounts, it was a bloody affair. The opposing sides employed similar hit-and-run style cavalry tactics and soon the battlefield became a chaotic melee of charge, counter-charge and retreat. Mounted archers on both sides circled the action raining arrows down on the combatants and each other.

Interestingly, Ayn Jalut is also the first battle in history that saw the use of firearms. While it’s believed that the Mongols had first introduced the Chinese invention of gunpowder to the Muslim world in the 13th Century, it was the Mamelukes who deployed several sections of “hand cannoneers” at Ayn Jalut. Although woefully inaccurate by any standard, particularly when compared to the Mongol bow, the weapons made enough noise to frighten enemy horses. And while the Mamelukes use of the hand cannon was not pivotal in the battle, it did show that they tried every possible weapon known to them to try and stop the Mongols.

As the fighting ranged, casualties mounted. Among them was Kitbuga, the Mongol’s own leader who was reportedly captured and put to death. The Mamelukes fought fiercely, encouraged by their own general, Qutuz who reportedly stripped off his helmet so his men would recognize him and charged headlong into the action. Unlike so many previous opponents of the Mongols, the Mamelukes refused to break and inflicted grievous losses on the enemy. By day’s end, the invaders broke and fled.

With the Mongols vanquished, the Middle East was saved from foreign domination. Five hundred years of Islamic culture and learning – knowledge that would go on to inform Western civilization – was saved. It also cemented the Mamelukes as the premier power in the Middle East.

A generation later, Egypt’s famous warrior slaves would eventually drive the Christians from the region, ending the 200-year experiment of the Crusader states.

For the Mongols, Ain Jalut was the high point of their westward expansion. Within five years, the empire would be fractured by civil war. The age of Mongol supremacy was over.
 
. .
Bro, I would humbly like to point out that, Islam never needed saving from anyone or with any battle. It is already saved and preserved by the shear will of Allah. Muslims needed saving, not Islam. You should change the tittle.

Agree, sorry for that.
I've changed it.
 
. . .
One can only imagine the pain, rape, suffering and destruction the people of Baghdad went through

The same will be our fate, if we didn't get back to the right path. The path of Quran and Sunnah. If the people of Baghdad can be destroyed due to their wrong deeds, then what is special in us?
 
. . .
The same will be our fate, if we didn't get back to the right path. The path of Quran and Sunnah. If the people of Baghdad can be destroyed due to their wrong deeds, then what is special in us?

It's kind of weird. For a country who has a very aggressive, and now probably genocidal, neighbour to the east and not to mention unfriendly neighbours to the west, pakistanis don't really have a sense of urgency or anything. If those hindus ever get the better of us, they won't hold back their savagery and I don't think the average pakistani man will be capable of defending anything.
 
.
It's kind of weird. For a country who has a very aggressive, and now probably genocidal, neighbour to the east and not to mention unfriendly neighbours to the west, pakistanis don't really have a sense of urgency or anything. If those hindus ever get the better of us, they won't hold back their savagery and I don't think the average pakistani man will be capable of defending anything.

Absolutely, this laid back attitude will haunt us.
 
. .
How do you think we can change that?

In my opinion, 1000 books and hundred thousand research papers can be written on this topic. However, I will just present few basic things which would be necessary to set our path straight.

To confront ideological threats, this nation is in a dire need of a leader. A leader who can set it's direction, it's long term policy goals and to establish a state discourse based on the principals of the Quran and the Sunnah. It is highly unlikely that we are going to find such a leader of such talents and capabilities in the foreseeable future. However, it is the responsibility of our educated class to face and confront ideological threats whether they are internal or external. The biggest ideological threat we are facing in this day and age is the narrative of secularism. Implementation of this narrative will be enough to rip us apart and to throw us in the lap of Hindus.

And to deal with practical threats, first and foremost we need to build our economy, at least we should be standing on our own feet. This economic dependency on loans and foreign powers needs to be ended. Secondly, we should and must completely revamp our educational system, providing equal opportunities to all citizens.

National strength and resilience depends upon these two aspects. By addressing these challenges we can easily address various security and strategic challenges. In short, these are the pillars of national power, and unfortunately we are not strengthening these pillars.
 
Last edited:
.
Several mongol offshots converted to Islam later, either way Islam would've survived and expand.

Egyptians were saved from massacre, however.
 
.
In my opinion, 1000 books and hundred thousand research papers can be written on this topic. However, I will just present few basic things which would be necessary to set our path straight.

To confront ideological threats, this nation is in a dire need of a leader. A leader who can set it's direction, it's long term policy goals and to establish a state discourse based on the principals of the Quran and the Sunnah. It is highly unlikely that we are going to find such a leader of such talents and capabilities in the foreseeable future. However, it is the responsibility of our educated class to face and confront ideological threats whether they are internal or external. The biggest ideological threat we are facing in this day and age is the narrative of secularism. Implementation of this narrative will be enough to rip us apart and to throw us in the lap of Hindus.

And to deal with practical threats, first and foremost we need to build our economy, at least we should be standing on our own feet. This economic dependency on loans and foreign powers needs to be ended. Secondly, we should and must completely revamp our educational system, providing equal opportunities to all citizens.

National strength and resilience depends upon these two aspects. By addressing these challenges we can easily address various security and strategic challenges. In short, these are the pillars of national power, and unfortunately we are not strengthening these pillars.

Such a leader would probably be overthrown in a coup or maybe the people themselves might be manipulated to turn against him. But yeh it would be nice if we got such a leader.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom