What's new

Batla ghost returns with autopsy

. .
GUN NOT FOUND


Chargesheet filed in Batla House case



No Independent Witnesses To Encounter​


Rahul Tripathi | TNN



New Delhi: In the first official document from cops detailing the sequence of events leading to the controversial Batla House encounter in 2008, the Delhi Police on Wednesday filed a chargesheet in the case in a Delhi court.

The 1100-page chargesheet, however, doesn’t mention any independent witnesses and relies on the testimonies of cops, doctors and experts. Though the crime branch recorded the statement of 57 witnesses, it could not trace any independent witnesses.
With all thier might they could not get even a SINGLE INDEPENDENT WITNESS. This show itself the pathetic nature of this MURDER in the name of ENCOUNTER. -- Fighter

The chargesheet has been filed against Shehzad alias Pappu, the suspect arrested by Delhi Police from Azamgarh. However, no charges have been levelled against Mohammad Saif, who had allegedly locked himself inside the toilet in L-18 flat of Batla House when the encounter was on. Shehzad has been charged with the murder of inspector Mohan Chand Sharma, criminal conspiracy and firing on the police team.
:rofl::rofl: Even when they could not recover the weapon used to FIRE at Inspector Sharma, but they were VIGILLIANT ENOUGH to capture the OFFENDER red-handed :rofl::rofl: -- Fighter

Ariz alias Junaid, another militant who fled from the Batla House, has been declared proclaimed offender and a reward of Rs 5 lakh declared on him. They have been charged under sections 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder), 120 b (criminal conspiracy), 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) and Arms Act.

The chargesheet contains details of the postmortem report conducted by AIIMS on inspector Mohan Chand Sharma and two alleged militants — Atif Ameen and Mohd Sajid. A report from the board of doctors who analyzed and detailed the nature of injuries is also part of the documents. It says that while Sharma suffered injuries from a .30 bore weapon, the two alleged terrorists were hit by bullets fired from 9mm pistol and AK-47 assault rifle. The .30 bore weapon used to fire on Sharma could not be traced, the cops said in the chargesheet. :rofl:

Forensic reports from CFSL about the bullets fired at L-18 are also part of the chargesheet. It claimed that the investigation into the encounter by crime branch is based on scientific evidence.

The chargesheet remains silent on the role of policemen who first entered the L-18 Batla House and what triggered the firing. It merely states that a team of Special Cell investigating the September 13 serial blasts reached the flat tracking a mobile number. On verification, people holed up inside opened fire at the police team resulting in the death of Sharma and later two militants in the cross fire.

The chargesheet also discusses senior lawyer Prashant Bhusan’s allegations in the Delhi high court that the encounter was fake.

Rebutting his claim, the cops cite Shehzad’s confession. The chargesheet states that Shehzad claimed that he along with Ariz had fired on the police team and later fled from the scene taking advantage of the chaos. He then fled to Azamgarh and was hiding in Lucknow before going to Mumbai. He then went to Jodhpur from where he again came back to Azamgarh from where the UP ATS nabbed him.

What The 1100-Page Document Says


1100-page chargesheet filed at an ACMM court in Patiala House
First official document from Delhi Police detailing the sequence of events that led to the encounter
Shehzad alias Pappu charged with the murder of inspector Mohan Chand Sharma in Batla House encounter

Mohd Saif, the captured militant from L-18, not chargesheeted

He is still a MILLITANT even after HE WAS NOT CHARGSHEETED:angry::angry::angry: -- Fighter

Ariz alias Junaid , one of the militants who fled from the spot, declared proclaimed offender and reward of Rs 5 L declared on him
Weapon used by two militants — a.30 bore pistol — not traced

Chargesheet filed under sections 302, 307, 120 b, 186, 353 and Arms Act

Postmortem report of Sharma, and two militants — Atif Ameen and Chota Sajid — included

On Sept 19, ’08, a Delhi Police team tracking the mobile number of IM operative, Atif Ameen, while probing Delhi’s Sept 13 serial blasts reached L-18 flat at Batla House

Inspector Mohan Chand Sharma and SI Dharmendra
knocked on the door posing as verification officer. They tried to enter the flat holed up inside the flat started firing on two officers. Sharma died after being hit by two bullets

Militants — Atif Ameen & Chota Sajid — died while their aide Mohd Saif was caught. 2 others — Shehzad alias Pappu & Ariz alias Junaid — fled
 
Last edited:
.
Why r u bringing this Batla encounter case in this forum??

It neither related to Pakistan nor Indian defence in anyway??

I don't get ur intention or motivation behind to raise it in this forum.
 
.
fake encounters or real the fact is after these dogs were killed the series of bomb blasts in india during that period came to an end which justifies any thing the police has done.There is no reason to be kind or to give any human rights to such rabid dogs
 
.
Why r u bringing this Batla encounter case in this forum??

It neither related to Pakistan nor Indian defence in anyway??

I don't get ur intention or motivation behind to raise it in this forum.

When killing people in the name of terrorism is not an issue about INDIAN DEFENCE? Could you explain?

You probably did not bother to read the news at all! Right! But still find yourself eligible to express your retarded views.

How on earth killing innocent INDIANS become a MARK OF PATRIOTISM? You people seem to SHUT your eyes all the time when ever BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION of minoroties is raised.

And then you are still SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC, ENLIGHTENED INDIAN? :devil: :tdown:

Fighter
 
.
fake encounters or real the fact is after these dogs were killed the series of bomb blasts in india during that period came to an end which justifies any thing the police has done.There is no reason to be kind or to give any human rights to such rabid dogs


You better get a mental checkup of yourself, as you are JUSTIFYING KILLING INNOCENT people in the name of SECURITY FOR ALL!

Rabid Dogs are not those who are killed in cold blood murder, BUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU who rape MORAL, SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC AND PROGRESSIVE FABRIC of this great country with your CHEAP MENTALITY ! :angry:

Fighter
 
.
When killing people in the name of terrorism is not an issue about INDIAN DEFENCE? Could you explain?

You probably did not bother to read the news at all! Right! But still find yourself eligible to express your retarded views.

How on earth killing innocent INDIANS become a MARK OF PATRIOTISM? You people seem to SHUT your eyes all the time when ever BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION of minoroties is raised.

And then you are still SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC, ENLIGHTENED INDIAN? :devil: :tdown:

Fighter

And u are tryin to be SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC, ENLIGHTENED INDIAN ?? by putting this stuff here??:devil::tdown:

Stop this nonsense.U are only creating more distrust and rift than generating any sympathy.
 
.
And u are tryin to be SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC, ENLIGHTENED INDIAN ?? by putting this stuff here??:devil::tdown:

Stop this nonsense.U are only creating more distrust and rift than generating any sympathy.
YES !

And trying pathetically to change you to be a SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC, ENLIGHTENED INDIAN, but realized my effort to be AN UTTER FAILURE!

And it is not the distrust that I am creating but the other way round. The EVIL LOBBY you people CREATED on PDF about INDIAN MINORITIES need to be BUSTED from time to time.:angry:

I am trying to do my job! :lol:


Fighter
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom