Keysersoze
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,858
- Reaction score
- 2
AK as in Avtomat Kalashnikova or Kalashnikov???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Commonality of ammuntion? I thought that the G3 used Nato standard 7.62 (7.62x51)and the Chinese weapon used the Russian standard. (7.62x39)?
Have they retooled the Ak's in Pak service?
May require further checking-up but based on what I know, both rifles use 7.62x51 produced by POF. 51mm vs 39mm is just the length of the cartridge casing so its not that much of a difference. The round is of the exact same size.
I know it for a fact that a lot of AK-47 were purchased by CIA from Egypt for supply to the Afghan Mujahideen. I asked an ex class mate who was an ordinance officer, the reply was that AK-47; besides being an excellent assault weapon, makes a good noise which was liked by the Mujahideen and they preferred it over any other weapon such as M-16 of G3. Another favouite was Uzi sub machine gun, even though Israeli, Mujahideen loved it!
Standard issue of PA has been G3 since the 70's.
I think there were a couple of other reasons as to why AK-47s were purchased for the Afghan Mujahideen.
a) The Afghan Army and the Russians used the same, thus commonality in ammunition as well as ease of use of captured weapons.
b) The Ak-47 did not give away outside support to the Mujahideen as would G-3 (Pakistan made it) etc. I do not think that M-16 etc. were even considered since they were too expensive and cumbersom to maintain in the dusty, rugged environments of Afghanistan.
c) I am not sure if Uzi was ever used by Afghans...I could be wrong but have never seen one in the hands of an Afghan. The Isrealis actually shipped (via CIA) large numbers of captured AK-47s and other small arms of Soviet origin that they had captured in the previous wars.
May require further checking-up but based on what I know, both rifles use 7.62x51 produced by POF. 51mm vs 39mm is just the length of the cartridge casing so its not that much of a difference. The round is of the exact same size.
Its not the weapon but the user who could be at fault, by using the wrong gun oil in cold climate conditions. The ammo could be faulty too, sime most ammo is made to operate at -50 to +54 degrees centigrade.Secondly yes, they do use the smaller less powerful Sov round there. The reason is simple at anything below -20 C the G-3 refuse to fire,
Intersting point, What does the experience say?The army has always peferred the 7.62 x 51 (indeed at one time we were the only major army still supporting it) and the army feels that events in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as our own experience in kashmir vs the(in X and XXX corps sectors) have vindicated our confidence in that round.lalas's INSAS
Its not the weapon but the user who could be at fault, by using the wrong gun oil in cold climate conditions. The ammo could be faulty too, sime most ammo is made to operate at -50 to +54 degrees centigrade.
Intersting point, What does the experience say?
I have to agree with sword's comments regarding weapon maintenance and ammo issues. However sometimes other factors such as the type of materials used in the weapon can differ (for numerous reasons) and that can affect the weapon in extreme situations.
Not possible, one is nearly double the size of the other. I had some comparative pictures of the two rounds on my laptop, but I can't find them.
The problem encountered on Siachen is not something unique to the Pakistani Army and as such can not be attributed to maintenance and cleaning of the weapons...G-3 was found to be more susceptible to this extreme weather in contrast to the Type-56. This was the same reason that the IA also switched to AK-47 instead of their SLR (FN FAL 7.62) on the glacier. Even now when troops are not using their rifles, the action mechanism is kept under wrap in order to keep it from being impacted by the extreme cold...the gun lubricant/oil too was found to be inappropriate and changed (I suspect that was due to issues related with oil viscosity). The same problem exists with other weapons like LMGs/HMGs etc.
Well the thing is that certain forces are trained to operate in extreme cold conditions (Scandinavian and Canadian forces for example.) I know the oil and type of mechanism does change. for these conditions. I will post a guide for cold weather warfare.
As a quick aside the coldest I have been out has been -32 and that was damn cold!
Keyser,
Just a point. The kind of challenges that PA and IA have faced at Siachen, Scandinavians and Canadians could not even dream about it....the HA warfare schools on both sides of the IB are recognised as the best in the world and problems with rifles and equipment have happened due to the extreme (I mean it in the absolute sense of the word) climatic conditions that exist over there.
The guide that you have quoted from actually is applicable to the Forces deployed in the Northern areas (as in the Pakistani Forces under the FCNA and Kargil etc)....currently none of the US or European forces operate above 16000 ft (whereas we have positions all the way up to 22000 ft....this is uncharted territory as the temps dip to -50 degrees and the positions and weapons are sustained in this type of env. for months at a time.)
The problems with G-3 were not one-off issues with maint. of the weapon.