What's new

Bashar Al-Assad visits UAE

That's a separate issue. Btw, nuclear weapons of NATO is in possession of USA. They have planted them in UK, Italy etc. None of them is controlled by those countries but its USA that has the codes. Unless Turkey expels Americans from its soil which will be considered a friendly and welcomed gesture by its RUssian/Iranian neighbor.

Turkey failed to transfer Al-Qaeda into Nakhcivan, their plan was not helping Azerbaijan in its war against Armenians but occupation of that land, it was met with iron fist FYI.

In Lybia, Lybian people are taking control of the country not as successful as Syrians but they will surely kick NATO invaders including Turkey out of their country. Rest assured, Turkey is badly failing inside the country. It's economy cannot recover after COVID hit, no tourist no flow of cash and guess what billions of foreign debt to everyone out there. This provides Syrians and Libyans with a huge opportunity to get rid of them. Time will show you their place.

Everything you are posting is incoherent sentences and not ground reality.. A NATO nuclear sharing policy is for the sole purpose of using them in defensive cases otherwise the sharing policy wouldn't be there but just restoring them there like it is in Germany and other places which doesn't have such agreement.

Again absolute delulu with the Nakhcivan stuff.. Armenia is CSTO country and you are saying Turkey was planning to attack sovereign Armenia :rofl: Azerbaijan attacked Nagorno-Karabkh that is not sovereign Armenia.. But the Nakhcivan corridor is within sovereign Armenia there was never a military plan there.. atleast not until Armenia leaves CSTO..

Covid part sounds like you are a girl... But either Turkey achieved it's objectives in Libya and if the Libyans can make an election then good for them Turkey losses nothing there. Atleast Libya is back on track but not partitioned Syria tho
 
.
Everything you are posting is incoherent sentences and not ground reality.. A NATO nuclear sharing policy is for the sole purpose of using them in defensive cases otherwise the sharing policy wouldn't be there but just restoring them there like it is in Germany and other places which doesn't have such agreement.

Again absolute delulu with the Nakhcivan stuff.. Armenia is CSTO country and you are saying Turkey was planning to attack sovereign Armenia :rofl: Azerbaijan attacked Nagorno-Karabkh that is not sovereign Armenia.. But the Nakhcivan corridor is within sovereign Armenia there was never a military plan there.. atleast not until Armenia leaves CSTO..

Covid part sounds like you are a girl... But either Turkey achieved it's objectives in Libya and if the Libyans can make an election then good for them Turkey losses nothing there. Atleast Libya is back on track but not partitioned Syria tho
Btw, enjoy the show. Assad is in UAE where Erdogan went on his knees :rofl:
 
.
Good visit. :tup:

What about the blood ,lifes they have wasted...now they r having a reunion.

So there should be perpetual war ? Is that also your intention for India and Pakistan including with regards to Kashmir ?

Yeah Syria won By being splitted into 3 defacto countries:lol:

Syria hasn't split but such was the intention of the NATO-created-"rebel" flag which has three stars right from early 2011.

Civil war you joker?

Those words - "Syrian civil war" - should be banned on the forum.

It Became Russia vs Rebels

"Rebels" coming from India to Indonesia to Bangladesh to Britain and so on ? :lol:
 
. . .

Syria’s Assad visits UAE in first trip to Arab state since 2011​

Bashar al-Assad meets the rulers of Abu Dhabi and Dubai in first visit to an Arab state since the Syrian war erupted.





3429813.jpg
3429812.jpg
3429811.jpg
3429806.jpg
3429809.jpg
3429815.jpg
3429808.jpg
3429810.jpg
3429814.jpg
3429807.jpg

May Allah, not even a single person survive from the ofspring of these people. Millions of people displace, thousands killed, thousands raped, thousands orphaned... And now they are shaking hands. May Allah put his wrath on these soul-less creatures.
 
. .
There will be mass demonstration if he ever visit Indonesia, but I believe Indonesia government under Jokowi will reject his visit plan to Indonesia if Assad ever want to do such thing.
 
.
There will be mass demonstration if he ever visit Indonesia, but I believe Indonesia government under Jokowi will reject his visit plan to Indonesia if Assad ever want to do such thing.

Why would Jokowi allow a separatist leader from a partitioned enclave visit him?
 
.
There will be mass demonstration if he ever visit Indonesia, but I believe Indonesia government under Jokowi will reject his visit plan to Indonesia if Assad ever want to do such thing.
A question sir, does Indonesian government support JI members?
 
.
Why would Jokowi allow a separatist leader from a partitioned enclave visit him?

I doubt Indonesian government will accept if such plan from Syria ever exist. There is even no communication ever come up within Indonesian media about Indonesia-Syria cooperation or even talks between lower rank officials since the Syrian war started until now.

Basically Indonesian people are pro democratic people and will likely support any democratic movement around the world, this is also represented on current Indonesian leaders mindset who support democratic movement in Myanmar but our principle is always no interference and let internal conflict be solved by internal powers.

Islamist sentiment will also come out as for Indonesian people, ISIS and Bashar are similar from Indonesian point of view, both killed many people, women and kids, he should have step down to avoid war, but he chooses war.

Bashar will not visit Indonesia, the same thing like Aung San Sukyi despite Indonesia is seen as role model of democratic country in SEA, Aung San Sukyi cancelled her trip to Indonesia after she become leader in Myanmar due to the expelsion of Rohingya by Myanmar military
 
Last edited:
.
Civil war you joker? It was a foreign imposed war on Syrians. It is true that before that war on Syrians, public of Syria asked for some reforms from Bashar government. It was then NATO helibourned hundreds of thousands of it's foreign mercenaries such as ISIS into Syrian cities. Most of Al-Qaeda fighters used land routes of Syrian neighbors to destabilize the country and Kurds as always allowed USA/Israel axis of evil to have multiple bases on their soil.

In the meantime, except for parts of SYria occupied by France, UK and USA and also TUrkish supported headchoppers in Idlib, most of the country is under control of the central government. Turkey is the number 1 threat to be dealt with.

You need to delve into the topic of Arab Spring movement in 2011:

The Arab Spring was a series of pro-democracy uprisings that enveloped several largely Muslim countries, including Tunisia, Morocco, Syria, Libya, Egypt and Bahrain. The events in these nations generally began in the spring of 2011, which led to the name. However, the political and social impact of these popular uprisings remains significant today, years after many of them ended.


Arab Spring movement in other countries inspired Dera'a Protests in Syria in pursuit of political reforms:

In mid-March 2011, the Middle East had been in turmoil for weeks, as the Arab Spring, a wave of popular protest, rolled through the region. Long-ruling dictators had just been thrown out of office in Tunisia and Egypt, and news flooded in about the upheaval in Yemen, Libya, and Bahrain. But Syria, one of the harshest dictatorships in the region, had hardly stirred.

Now, that was about to change. Inspired by what was happening in the region and outraged by recent abuses at the hands of local security chiefs, a small group of men came out of Friday prayers in the southern city of Dera’a on the afternoon of March 18, 2011, determined to stage the city’s first public protest in decades.

Amid chants of “freedom” and “after today, there is no fear,” the demonstrators shouted complaints about brutal security chiefs, corrupt officials, poverty, joblessness, and other local grievances. There seem to have been no calls for the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad, but that made no difference in the eyes of the regime.


For decades, criticism of Syria’s ruling elite had been banned and even the faintest sign of open protest had triggered police crackdowns. With Arab dictators falling all around, the regime was tense and paranoid—and in Dera’a, it lashed out violently from the very beginning.

How exactly things transpired that Friday afternoon is hard to tell, but in an era of fake news and online forgeries, it is comforting to be able to say that we know for certain that the Dera’a protest happened. Many of the details may remain hazy, but the broad outlines are in full view, since Syria was the first war to play out fully in the age of cell phones and the Internet. Already that evening, shaky cell phone footage was drifting around on YouTube and being rebroadcast by world television: short clips of crowds moving across grainy screens, stone-throwing, helicopters buzzing in the sky, gunfire crackling somewhere in the background.

At least two young men were killed that Friday: Mahmoud Jawabreh and Hossam Ayyash, who are still today celebrated as martyrs by supporters of the Syrian opposition. New illegal demonstrations followed at their funerals on March 19, setting in motion a spiral of protest and repression in which ever-larger numbers of Syrians were arrested, wounded, and killed.

As news of the March 18 killings bounced around Facebook, YouTube, and Al Jazeera, demonstrations rose in solidarity with Dera’a in other Syrian towns—in cities like Damascus, Baniyas, and Latakia and in faraway villages unknown even to most Syrians.

That was the start of Syria’s revolution. After decades of enforced silence and ruthless dictatorship, it was, for its participants and sympathizers, a moment of genuine collective action and hope, but it would cruelly misfire into civil war and foreign proxy conflict.






Assad administration ordered crackdown on Dera'a protests with use of force but it underestimated the scale of political dissent in the country; opposing forces banded together to establish Free Syrian Army (FSA) and Civil War broke out consequently.


Foreign interventions materialized as well: Iran and Russia decided to support Assad regime while Turkey decided to support FSA.

ISIS was an Iraqi movement but expanded to Syria in 2013.

The Islamic State – also known as ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh – emerged from the remnants of al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), a local offshoot of al Qaeda founded by Abu Musab al Zarqawi in 2004. It faded into obscurity for several years after the surge of U.S. troops to Iraq in 2007. But it began to reemerge in 2011. Over the next few years, it took advantage of growing instability in Iraq and Syria to carry out attacks and bolster its ranks.

The group changed its name to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in 2013. ISIS launched an offensive on Mosul and Tikrit in June 2014. On June 29, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi announced the formation of a caliphate stretching from Aleppo in Syria to Diyala in Iraq, and renamed the group the Islamic State.

A U.S.-led coalition began airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq on August 7, 2014, and expanded the campaign to Syria the following month. On October 15, the United States named the campaign “Operation Inherent Resolve.”


Entire history of ISIS movement in the region is captured through time in following link:


Your assertion ("NATO helibourned hundreds of thousands of it's foreign mercenaries such as ISIS into Syrian cities.") is FALSE. NATO arrived in Syria and joined hands with regional Kurd to fight ISIS in the region (Operation Inherent Resolve).

https://crsreports.congress.gov › ...PDF
Kurds in Iraq and Syria: U.S. Partners Against the Islamic State

Situation on the ground in Syria was like this for some years:

Assad administration + Iran + Russia vs. FSA + Turkey

ISIL vs. YPG + NATO

But NATO had internal tensions over how to handle ISIL in the region. Turkey had disagreements with USA on the matter of supporting Kurd:


War in Syria was a tragedy on many counts with no sense of accountability in international forums.

UAE courting Bashar al-Assad shows that morality and principles take a back seat in Foreign Affairs in current times. UAE is courting many countries including Israel and India.

Not much of a surprise TBH.
 
.
There will be mass demonstration if he ever visit Indonesia, but I believe Indonesia government under Jokowi will reject his visit plan to Indonesia if Assad ever want to do such thing.

Indos, you are becoming a mullah. :sad: Have you thought about those Indonesians who went to Afghanistan in the 1980s to help NATO in destroying a progressive Afghanistan and those Indonesians becoming part of the later Al Qaeda [ Edit : And these AQ criminals attacked inside Indonesia too ] ? And similar-minded Indonesians having gone to Syria 2011 onwards to destroy yet another Muslim-majority Socialist country. If some Indonesians will participate in demonstrations if Assad visits then those Indonesians should be ashamed of themselves because they never demonstrated against against the genocide of up to three million fellow Indonesian Communists, sympathizers and suspected sympathizers in 1965-66. Demonstrators against Assad's visit will have no moral right, they will be doing the same slave work for Western Crusader governments that Suharto and his mullah gangs did in 1965-66 when they genocided those people.
 
Last edited:
.
I doubt Indonesian government will accept if such plan from Syria ever exist. There is even no communication ever come up within Indonesian media about Indonesia-Syria cooperation or even talks between lower rank officials since the Syrian war started until now.

Basically Indonesian people are pro democratic people and will likely support any democratic movement around the world, this is also represented on current Indonesian leaders mindset who support democratic movement in Myanmar but our principle is always no interference and let internal conflict be solved by internal powers.

Islamist sentiment will also come out as for Indonesian people, ISIS and Bashar are similar from Indonesian point of view, both killed many people, women and kids, He should have step down to avoid war, but he chooses war.

Bashar will not visit Indonesia, the same thing like Aung San Sukyi despite Indonesia is seen as role model of democratic country in SEA, Aung San Sukyi cancelled her trip to Indonesia after she become leader in Myanmar due to the expelsion of Rohingya by Myanmar military
Indonesia does not have that much influence in west of Asia and its internal affairs but its embassy in Syria is intact.
Untitled.png


Indonesian terrorists called JI members were all eliminated by SAA. They were responsible for terror attacks inside Indonesia too.
You need to delve into the topic of Arab Spring movement in 2011:

The Arab Spring was a series of pro-democracy uprisings that enveloped several largely Muslim countries, including Tunisia, Morocco, Syria, Libya, Egypt and Bahrain. The events in these nations generally began in the spring of 2011, which led to the name. However, the political and social impact of these popular uprisings remains significant today, years after many of them ended.


Arab Spring movement in other countries inspired Dera'a Protests in Syria in pursuit of political reforms:

In mid-March 2011, the Middle East had been in turmoil for weeks, as the Arab Spring, a wave of popular protest, rolled through the region. Long-ruling dictators had just been thrown out of office in Tunisia and Egypt, and news flooded in about the upheaval in Yemen, Libya, and Bahrain. But Syria, one of the harshest dictatorships in the region, had hardly stirred.

Now, that was about to change. Inspired by what was happening in the region and outraged by recent abuses at the hands of local security chiefs, a small group of men came out of Friday prayers in the southern city of Dera’a on the afternoon of March 18, 2011, determined to stage the city’s first public protest in decades.

Amid chants of “freedom” and “after today, there is no fear,” the demonstrators shouted complaints about brutal security chiefs, corrupt officials, poverty, joblessness, and other local grievances. There seem to have been no calls for the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad, but that made no difference in the eyes of the regime.


For decades, criticism of Syria’s ruling elite had been banned and even the faintest sign of open protest had triggered police crackdowns. With Arab dictators falling all around, the regime was tense and paranoid—and in Dera’a, it lashed out violently from the very beginning.

How exactly things transpired that Friday afternoon is hard to tell, but in an era of fake news and online forgeries, it is comforting to be able to say that we know for certain that the Dera’a protest happened. Many of the details may remain hazy, but the broad outlines are in full view, since Syria was the first war to play out fully in the age of cell phones and the Internet. Already that evening, shaky cell phone footage was drifting around on YouTube and being rebroadcast by world television: short clips of crowds moving across grainy screens, stone-throwing, helicopters buzzing in the sky, gunfire crackling somewhere in the background.

At least two young men were killed that Friday: Mahmoud Jawabreh and Hossam Ayyash, who are still today celebrated as martyrs by supporters of the Syrian opposition. New illegal demonstrations followed at their funerals on March 19, setting in motion a spiral of protest and repression in which ever-larger numbers of Syrians were arrested, wounded, and killed.

As news of the March 18 killings bounced around Facebook, YouTube, and Al Jazeera, demonstrations rose in solidarity with Dera’a in other Syrian towns—in cities like Damascus, Baniyas, and Latakia and in faraway villages unknown even to most Syrians.

That was the start of Syria’s revolution. After decades of enforced silence and ruthless dictatorship, it was, for its participants and sympathizers, a moment of genuine collective action and hope, but it would cruelly misfire into civil war and foreign proxy conflict.






Assad administration ordered crackdown on Dera'a protests with use of force but it underestimated the scale of political dissent in the country; opposing forces banded together to establish Free Syrian Army (FSA) and Civil War broke out consequently.


Foreign interventions materialized as well: Iran and Russia decided to support Assad regime while Turkey decided to support FSA.

ISIS was an Iraqi movement but expanded to Syria in 2013.

The Islamic State – also known as ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh – emerged from the remnants of al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), a local offshoot of al Qaeda founded by Abu Musab al Zarqawi in 2004. It faded into obscurity for several years after the surge of U.S. troops to Iraq in 2007. But it began to reemerge in 2011. Over the next few years, it took advantage of growing instability in Iraq and Syria to carry out attacks and bolster its ranks.

The group changed its name to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in 2013. ISIS launched an offensive on Mosul and Tikrit in June 2014. On June 29, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi announced the formation of a caliphate stretching from Aleppo in Syria to Diyala in Iraq, and renamed the group the Islamic State.

A U.S.-led coalition began airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq on August 7, 2014, and expanded the campaign to Syria the following month. On October 15, the United States named the campaign “Operation Inherent Resolve.”


Entire history of ISIS movement in the region is captured through time in following link:


Your assertion ("NATO helibourned hundreds of thousands of it's foreign mercenaries such as ISIS into Syrian cities.") is FALSE. NATO arrived in Syria and joined hands with regional Kurd to fight ISIS in the region (Operation Inherent Resolve).

https://crsreports.congress.gov › ...PDF
Kurds in Iraq and Syria: U.S. Partners Against the Islamic State

Situation on the ground in Syria was like this for some years:

Assad administration + Iran + Russia vs. FSA + Turkey

ISIL vs. YPG + NATO

But NATO had internal tensions over how to handle ISIL in the region. Turkey had disagreements with USA on the matter of supporting Kurd:


War in Syria was a tragedy on many counts with no sense of accountability in international forums.

UAE courting Bashar al-Assad shows that morality and principles take a back seat in Foreign Affairs in current times. UAE is courting many countries including Israel and India.

Not much of a surprise TBH.
You shouldn't have bothered yourself with that long post sir, the word "democracy" says it all. No thank you, i don't want western endorsed democracy which is followed by flow of terrorists into the target country.
 
.
Indonesia does not have that much influence in west of Asia and its internal affairs but its embassy in Syria is intact.
View attachment 825431

Indonesian terrorists called JI members were all eliminated by SAA. They were responsible for terror attacks inside Indonesia too.

You shouldn't have bothered yourself with that long post sir, the word "democracy" says it all. No thank you, i don't want western endorsed democracy which is followed by flow of terrorists into the target country.
People can strive for democracy in any country - democratic ideals have significant appeal. Pakistan has its own history in this regard. You see conspiracy in everything, however.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom