What's new

Bashar al-Assad must go or face `military option: Saudi FM

Some numbers:

There is strong ISIS in Libya but no Assad => 5,000 killed since 2011.
In Syria with Assad => 250,000 killed since 2011.

So who is better Assad or ISIS?
 
.
Some numbers:

There is strong ISIS in Libya but no Assad => 5,000 killed since 2011.
In Syria with Assad => 250,000 killed since 2011.

So who is better Assad or ISIS?

It's a Civil War, both sides are committing atrocities, that's a given.

The difference is IS is a terrorist group with global ambition, they are committing terrorist attacks all over the globe. If they ever get their hands on a nuke, what's to stop them behaving like they normally do (suicide bombing) and actually using it?

At least Assad would not just start nuking people right, since he values his own life? But what exactly will stop IS from using a nuke the very second they get their hands on one?
 
.
Saudis can't even beat Yemenes and losing territories to them.

Saudis aren't serious threat to anyone in middle east and especially to Syrian Army
 
.
It's a Civil War, both sides are committing atrocities, that's a given.

The difference is IS have global ambition, they are committing terrorist attacks all over the globe. If they ever get their hands on a nuke, what's to stop them behaving like they normally do (suicide bombing) and actually using it?

At least Assad would not just start nuking people right, since he values his own life? But what exactly will stop IS from using a nuke the very second they get their hands on one?
In Libya there is also civil war, but number of casualties is tenfolds lower. IS cant have any nuke. They cant operate even a simple helicopter.
 
.
Some numbers:

There is strong ISIS in Libya but no Assad => 5,000 killed since 2011.
In Syria with Assad => 250,000 killed since 2011.

So who is better Assad or ISIS?
The difference is in capability. If ISIS had Chemical weapons they would use it too. Displacing Assad might just open the door for that. From purely a PoV of intent, ISIS is much worse, both for the people they kill and the people they rule.
 
. . .
In Libya there is also civil war, but number of casualties is tenfolds lower. IS cant have any nuke. They cant operate even a simple helicopter.

Alright, my opinions aside, do you consider Assad or the Islamic State to be a greater threat to Israel, in the long-run?

I mean they are both your neighbors now right? Which one do you consider more dangerous in the short-term, and/or in the long-term?

Is there a possibility of siding with one to defeat the other?
 
.
Some numbers:

There is strong ISIS in Libya but no Assad => 5,000 killed since 2011.
In Syria with Assad => 250,000 killed since 2011.

So who is better Assad or ISIS?
Assad
 
. .
Come now... Don't run away. Don't be an iranian.I know you've been taught to be a coward like the Iranians. But try to resist the urge this time. You consider yourself a man. You have some beliefs. Have the courage to explain them and defend them. I bet you anything you don't have the balls....
I got balks alright boy but not for gags like u to discuss with. Fixed ur shit post. Shows the lvl of ur growth. Ur values u hold and the lvl of ur intellect and seriously get in line, I don't have time to waste on u and shits like u. No matter what I say u mullah worshipers will refute it.
And also word of advise bark only when someone asks u to. When u are not talked to no need to open ur mouth as I said it makes u look more stupid and shown us what u are.

Now shoo and don't waste my time. In fact I am going to activate the ignore on ur stupid ***.
 
.
The problem is, what is the alternative?

There is currently a very large and growing country in the Middle East, called the Islamic State. Born out of the power vacuum in Iraq and Syria, they now control vast territories of the (former) countries known as Iraq and Syria.

People are fighting against it, but it keeps growing stronger.

This group is full of ex bath party members of Iraq who are trying to make a point that having secular despots is better than having Islamic governments. It's their way of extracting revenge for what happened to their boss and guess what, it fits right into the plan of those assrahelli zionazis who are hell bent to go at any length to vilify anything Islamic. This is why we see slavery to prostitution, everything forbidden by Islam, being practiced by ISIS terrorists, and all in the name of Islam.
 
.
ok i agree then saudi should alone invade Syria

Saudi should think Russia is there now
 
. .
With this mindset. Saudia dynasty days appears numbered.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom