What's new

Barak-8 surface-to-air missile trials slated for October

hkdas

BANNED
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
The long-awaited Barak long-range surface-to-air missile may be integrated with Indian warships within a “few months,” if the missile’s final trials slated next month succeed, said Navy officials.
5_img119814093927.jpg


The long-awaited Barak long-range surface-to-air missile may be integrated with Indian warships within a “few months,” if the missile’s final trials slated next month succeed, said Navy officials.

“Trials of the LR-SAM are scheduled for September end. It may be delayed by a few days to take place in the first week of October. If the trials are successful, the missile may be inducted within a few months,” said Rear Admiral A B Singh, assistant chief of naval staff in charge of policy and plans.

The missile being developed jointly by the Israel Aerospace Industries and the Defence Research and Development Organisation under a Rs 2,606 crore project, is in the works for a decade. The delay is impacting the Indian warship’s air defence capabilities.

Because of the delay, the navy’s new platform INS Kolkata, to be commissioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 16, will not have the air defence missile.
The missile will be fitted later when it will be fully ready for operational use.

The project is being delayed by four years, triggering concerns in the navy. Even the September trial was originally scheduled for August, but had to be shifted to a later date due to technical glitches associated with the performance of some of the parameters.

Besides the 6,800-tonne new destroyer, aircraft carrier Vikrant and the two future sister ships of INS Kolkata – INS Kochi and INS Chennai – too will be fitted with the Barak long-range missile that will have a range of 70 km.
“Each of the next two Kolkata class ships would be commissioned with a gap of eight months each,” said Vice Admiral A V Subhedar, controller of warship production and acquisition.

Within a week of commissioning the INS Kolkata, Defence Minister Arun Jaitley will commission an indigenous anti-submarine warfare corvette INS Kamorta in Visakhapatnam on August 23. It will be followed by three more ships of the same class Kadmat, Kiltan and Kavrati.

Both ships experienced serious delays. While the P-15A – the project to construct three Kolkata class ship at Mazgaon dock, Mumbai – is delayed by four years, the INS Kamorta was to be inducted in the Navy by two years.

The time overrun also led to a massive hike in the cost. The three Kolkata-class destroyers were to be made at a cost of Rs 3,580 crore as per the original proposal, prepared more than a decade ago.

But the cost has now gone up to Rs 11,662 crore. Similarly the cost of the manufacturing of four Kamorta class vessels too went up from Rs 3,051 crore to Rs 7,800 crore. Both warships have high level of indigenous material, systems and equipment.
Defence News - Barak-8 surface-to-air missile trials slated for October
 
. . .
why is the picture of a SM-2 o_O

Dumn A$$ news editor

The long-awaited Barak long-range surface-to-air missile may be integrated with Indian warships within a “few months,” if the missile’s final trials slated next month succeed, said Navy officials.
5_img119814093927.jpg


The long-awaited Barak long-range surface-to-air missile may be integrated with Indian warships within a “few months,” if the missile’s final trials slated next month succeed, said Navy officials.

“Trials of the LR-SAM are scheduled for September end. It may be delayed by a few days to take place in the first week of October. If the trials are successful, the missile may be inducted within a few months,” said Rear Admiral A B Singh, assistant chief of naval staff in charge of policy and plans.

The missile being developed jointly by the Israel Aerospace Industries and the Defence Research and Development Organisation under a Rs 2,606 crore project, is in the works for a decade. The delay is impacting the Indian warship’s air defence capabilities.

Because of the delay, the navy’s new platform INS Kolkata, to be commissioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 16, will not have the air defence missile.
The missile will be fitted later when it will be fully ready for operational use.

The project is being delayed by four years, triggering concerns in the navy. Even the September trial was originally scheduled for August, but had to be shifted to a later date due to technical glitches associated with the performance of some of the parameters.

Besides the 6,800-tonne new destroyer, aircraft carrier Vikrant and the two future sister ships of INS Kolkata – INS Kochi and INS Chennai – too will be fitted with the Barak long-range missile that will have a range of 70 km.
“Each of the next two Kolkata class ships would be commissioned with a gap of eight months each,” said Vice Admiral A V Subhedar, controller of warship production and acquisition.

Within a week of commissioning the INS Kolkata, Defence Minister Arun Jaitley will commission an indigenous anti-submarine warfare corvette INS Kamorta in Visakhapatnam on August 23. It will be followed by three more ships of the same class Kadmat, Kiltan and Kavrati.

Both ships experienced serious delays. While the P-15A – the project to construct three Kolkata class ship at Mazgaon dock, Mumbai – is delayed by four years, the INS Kamorta was to be inducted in the Navy by two years.

The time overrun also led to a massive hike in the cost. The three Kolkata-class destroyers were to be made at a cost of Rs 3,580 crore as per the original proposal, prepared more than a decade ago.

But the cost has now gone up to Rs 11,662 crore. Similarly the cost of the manufacturing of four Kamorta class vessels too went up from Rs 3,051 crore to Rs 7,800 crore. Both warships have high level of indigenous material, systems and equipment.
Defence News - Barak-8 surface-to-air missile trials slated for October

Great news,Aise hona chiye delay 1-2 mahine ke,DRDO walo ko kuch seekhna chaiye inse
 
.
70 km range? I take it Barak 8 is a naval version of Iron Dom. In no way does 70 km range qualify as a long range SAM.
 
.
70 km range? I take it Barak 8 is a naval version of Iron Dom. In no way does 70 km range qualify as a long range SAM.
meh, it's considered long range compared to Barak 1.

still not in the class of
-SM-2
-SM-6
-Aster-30
-S-300 Fort/Rif
 
.
why is the picture of a SM-2 o_O

Admin of that website claims he is journalist and we all know most in India fall in Desi Dork Media (DDM) category . I have many times pointed out errors in his posts which is usually copy paste but my god he is a arrogant *** .
 
.
meh, it's considered long range compared to Barak 1.

still not in the class of
-SM-2
-SM-6
-Aster-30
-S-300 Fort/Rif

You do realise that SM 2 and 6 are not for primarily anti aircraft/cruise missile defence purposes,rather their primary role is area defence against IRBMs.So quite naturally they have to have longer range and higher interception altitude.

Their primary anti cruise missile defense is based around the ESSM.So you should compare Barak 8 with the ESSM and not SM series.

Now coming to the Aster 30,yes,it's a similar missile system with similar envisaged roles but it's also quite heavier compared to the Barak 8.Besides the analogous to Aster 30 is already under development - the Barak 8ER.

By the way,modern air launched anti-ship missiles has much longer range than most ship based SAMs like the HQ 9 or the Aster 30.So any strike fighter can safely engage an warship from outside its SAM envelope and so having a 150km or 200km range SAM doesn't guarantee that you can engage the fighter before he could engage you.
In fact,the long range SAMs have to bigger and heavier which would inadvertently affect their lateral acceleration.And Barak 8 has been specifically designed to be light weight to address this issue.It excells in the latera acceleration field with reported capability to pull upwards 50g.When engaging an anti-ship missile,this is what that matters the most,not the maximum range.

meh, it's considered long range compared to Barak 1.

still not in the class of
-SM-2
-SM-6
-Aster-30
-S-300 Fort/Rif

You do realise that SM 2 and 6 are not for primarily anti aircraft/cruise missile defence purposes,rather their primary role is area defence against IRBMs.So quite naturally they have to have longer range and higher interception altitude.

Their primary anti cruise missile defense is based around the ESSM.So you should compare Barak 8 with the ESSM and not SM series.

Now coming to the Aster 30,yes,it's a similar missile system with similar envisaged roles but it's also quite heavier compared to the Barak 8.Besides the analogous to Aster 30 is already under development - the Barak 8ER.

By the way,modern air launched anti-ship missiles has much longer range than most ship based SAMs like the HQ 9 or the Aster 30.So any strike fighter can safely engage an warship from outside its SAM envelope and so having a 150km or 200km range SAM doesn't guarantee that you can engage the fighter before he could engage you.
In fact,the long range SAMs have to bigger and heavier which would inadvertently affect their lateral acceleration.And Barak 8 has been specifically designed to be light weight to address this issue.It excells in the latera acceleration field with reported capability to pull upwards 50g.When engaging an anti-ship missile,this is what that matters the most,not the maximum range.
 
.
Where are all those who claimed there was no way the BARAK-2 would be ready and in service in the IN before 2018?? o_Oo_O
 
.
We must look forward to developing a Naval version of Akash, I know the range sucks compared to Barak-8, but lets break the foreign dependency and build on it.

Where are all those who claimed there was no way the BARAK-2 would be ready and in service in the IN before 2018?? o_Oo_O

They are technically correct, Barak-2 is never gonna see light, its Barak-8 which is coming..
No offence, I was just simulating the answer you are gonna get.lol
 
.
We must look forward to developing a Naval version of Akash, I know the range sucks compared to Barak-8, but lets break the foreign dependency and build on it.
Akash is a generation behind in technology-navalsiing it isn't an option. Lessons can be learnt sure but Akash isn't a next generation SAM like the BARAK-8. Through compiling all that has gone into and been learnt of BARAK-8, Akash, Astra, Maitri SAM etc India surely is in a good position going foreword....
 
.
We must look forward to developing a Naval version of Akash, I know the range sucks compared to Barak-8, but lets break the foreign dependency and build on it.

There is a long range SAM in the works like S-300, etc. That's the one that'll be navalized, until then, LRSAM will fill the role.
 
.
You do realise that SM 2 and 6 are not for primarily anti aircraft/cruise missile defence purposes,rather their primary role is area defence against IRBMs.So quite naturally they have to have longer range and higher interception altitude.

Their primary anti cruise missile defense is based around the ESSM.So you should compare Barak 8 with the ESSM and not SM series.

Now coming to the Aster 30,yes,it's a similar missile system with similar envisaged roles but it's also quite heavier compared to the Barak 8.Besides the analogous to Aster 30 is already under development - the Barak 8ER.

By the way,modern air launched anti-ship missiles has much longer range than most ship based SAMs like the HQ 9 or the Aster 30.So any strike fighter can safely engage an warship from outside its SAM envelope and so having a 150km or 200km range SAM doesn't guarantee that you can engage the fighter before he could engage you.
In fact,the long range SAMs have to bigger and heavier which would inadvertently affect their lateral acceleration.And Barak 8 has been specifically designed to be light weight to address this issue.It excells in the latera acceleration field with reported capability to pull upwards 50g.When engaging an anti-ship missile,this is what that matters the most,not the maximum range.



You do realise that SM 2 and 6 are not for primarily anti aircraft/cruise missile defence purposes,rather their primary role is area defence against IRBMs.So quite naturally they have to have longer range and higher interception altitude.

Their primary anti cruise missile defense is based around the ESSM.So you should compare Barak 8 with the ESSM and not SM series.

Now coming to the Aster 30,yes,it's a similar missile system with similar envisaged roles but it's also quite heavier compared to the Barak 8.Besides the analogous to Aster 30 is already under development - the Barak 8ER.

By the way,modern air launched anti-ship missiles has much longer range than most ship based SAMs like the HQ 9 or the Aster 30.So any strike fighter can safely engage an warship from outside its SAM envelope and so having a 150km or 200km range SAM doesn't guarantee that you can engage the fighter before he could engage you.
In fact,the long range SAMs have to bigger and heavier which would inadvertently affect their lateral acceleration.And Barak 8 has been specifically designed to be light weight to address this issue.It excells in the latera acceleration field with reported capability to pull upwards 50g.When engaging an anti-ship missile,this is what that matters the most,not the maximum range.

SM-3 is for use against ballistic missiles.

SM-2 and SM-6 is used AAW

and you are right Barak 8 is equivalent of ESSM used mostly for against AShM
 
.
Barak-8 is in the class of ESSM not SM-2/3 or S-300. Its mainly a AShM with total anti-air capabilities. Its new developed with latest technologies.
 
.
Barak-8 is in the class of ESSM not SM-2/3 or S-300. Its mainly a AShM with total anti-air capabilities. Its new developed with latest technologies.

It's not an AShM but an Anti - AShM ..... :D
 
.
Back
Top Bottom