zebra7
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 2,135
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BHAI..aik baat to bata...sea me still target hone ka koi purpose??? koi ship ya sub...jo sea me still rehne k lye bani ho...???[/QUOTE]@amardeep mishra Could you explain
ISPR saying it can hit the targets at Land and Sea does not means it can target the Moving target but the stationary target. I had already explain you in detail, that for targeting the Moving target with this Sub sonic Cruise Missile you would need continuous Monitoring, updates of the Target thru High speed two way Link. And Land and Sea target Means the stationary target whose coordinates and flight path is embebedded in the Missile prior to the launch, and the Missile sensors matches with the Maps in its memory to remain in its course of flight aka terracom. In case of SEA target e.g Island or Naval RIG there is no land picture for matching, in this case the magnetic imaging of sea is used instead of visual terrain map.
Thank you for a very joyous update!
Oil RigsBHAI..aik baat to bata...sea me still target hone ka koi purpose??? koi ship ya sub...jo sea me still rehne k lye bani ho...???
Im not falling for any theory. Infact in serving in PN and know a little of these things. Anti-air missile like Barak should be taken seriously bcz it effectively counter our offensive capabilities. Plus we ourselves do not have any similar platform. What are ur comments abt Brahmos and how to protect ourself from it?My dear don't fall for the stupid Indian theory, we are not exactly talking about land or stationary targets where fire is directed East to West and vice versa and it's not as if only the missile carrier will be the target.
The size of IN is too big, I don't think PN will waste time n resources on Oil Rigs. Naval bases our more equivalent to ground targets. So in Sea the main threat remains ships n subs.which are always movable
If cm 400 akg is not very effective against fast moving naval target... than how much effective brahmos is against similar target given its also hypersonic?
US navy never went for a hypersonic anti ship cm, even for future they seem to be betting on naval attack version of tomahawk...
To hit a moving ship at sea you going to need terminal guidance ..does raad has it if not cut the crap of hitting targets at sea which you rant all the time ....and your raad is not some super weapon that cannot be shot down ..CIWS and barak 1 is more than enough
And yes IN is indeed mighty we are not talking about coast guard here
The size of IN is too big, I don't think PN will waste time n resources on Oil Rigs. Naval bases our more equivalent to ground targets. So in Sea the main threat remains ships n subs.which are always movable[/QUOTE]Oil Rigs
Naval bases
The missile by itself would be pretty useless. As implied by my response to the previous question, an entire “system of systems” is needed to make it work. Some countries might buy them just to impress their neighbors, but their combat effectiveness would be negligible unless the country also invested in the needed detection, data processing, and communications systems.
New Recruit
US navy never went for a hypersonic anti ship cm
even for future they seem to be betting on naval attack version of tomahawk...
Ok my question was accuracy of super or hypersonic missile against fast moving target....