Banning any party isn't best way: British Foreign Office Minister

[Fahad Khan 2]

BNP is representer of BD and Awami league represents India more then BD.....

 

[Armstrong]

I am sure you dont want it literally.. ... although I understand the feeling.. its actually completely misplaced..
a country without leaders will result in civil war, the best bet is to tolerate them and wait for the system to throw in some good people..as the quality of voters improves, the quality of leaders will improve..

Or they could accept me as their King & I'd turn the country around in a fortnight !

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

Abbaiii isn't that a women's emoticon !

A BNP supporter; I could live with Pakistan apologizing to them !

Dair aya darusst aya...

 

[Skies]

Hmm...as I thought the west might oppose a ban on Jamat.

No the west opposes the oppression.

 

[Armstrong]

Dair aya darusst aya...

Yaraaa tou apna Avatar change kar tujhee seriously leinaa boha mushkal ho rahaa haiii....Spongebob ko dikkh kar hassiii nikal hiii jaaatiii haiii !

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

I am sure you dont want it literally.. ... although I understand the feeling.. its actually completely misplaced..
a country without leaders will result in civil war, the best bet is to tolerate them and wait for the system to throw in some good people..as the quality of voters improves, the quality of leaders will improve..

what if there PM is more keen in putting country in civil war becasue she is not doing dilouge with oppostion and banning and putting them in corner it will reach to civil war...

 

[livingdead]

Or they could accept me as their King & I'd turn the country around in a fortnight !

I will eat my words too, if they appoint me as 'loving leader' for life...
I will turn my life within a day...

 

[Fahad Khan 2]

Yaraaa tou apna Avatar change kar tujhee seriously leinaa boha mushkal ho rahaa haiii....Spongebob ko dikkh kar hassiii nikal hiii jaaatiii haiii !

yar ma siasat.pk per be is name or avatar sa hon is liya rakha hai..... waise mujay serious lena be nahi....

 

[livingdead]

what if there PM is more keen in putting country in civil war becasue she is not doing dilouge with oppostion and banning and putting them in corner it will reach to civil war...

No PM wants civil war in country, dont be silly. This is political opportunism, although banning is going a bit too far. Jamatis are not primary opposition party, they are a fringe player... even then they represent a sizable population which should not be ignored.

 

[scholseys]

Hasina and Hasina lovin brigade of pdf (not naming names) can suck it

 

[JanjaWeed]

You are just going to make them more popular by banning them. Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is a classic example... successive leaders kept them underground & now they are running the country!!

 

[somebozo]

Yep because Jamati puritan ideas make them easy target of exploitation by west at the time of need. Just look around and see most of the hardcore fundos are also best friends of west be it Afghanistan, Syria or Libya.

 

[Hammer-fist]

Well Jamat got 4.6% of the vote in the last elections.

I wonder if it will be even less next time.

 

[idune]

Hasina and Hasina lovin brigade of pdf (not naming names) can suck it

That is just message from UK. US message has not come yet but one can imagine it will be much harder than what Awami league and Hasina can swallow.

 

[scholseys]

That is just message from UK. US message has not come yet but one can imagine it will be much harder than what Awami league and Hasina can swallow.

Review & Outlook: American Unions vs. Bangladesh's Workers - WSJ.com ....american message?

Will ban on Islamic party heal wounds? | Asia | DW.DE | 18.02.2013 german message