What's new

Bangladeshi companies rush overseas as Dhaka relaxes rules

Mage

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
5,175
Reaction score
-6
Country
Japan
Location
Sweden
Central bank expected to finalize liberalized outward investment policy soon

A.Z.M. ANAS, Contributing writer

20171116_Incepta_Pharmaceuticals_article_main_image.jpg

Workers assembling boxes for packaging medicines at Incepta Pharmaceuticals in Dhaka. © Getty Images

DHAKA -- Until recently, outward investment was something corporate Bangladesh could only dream about. But a loosening of government controls has prompted a raft of proposals for overseas expansion as companies seek to diversify earnings.

In October, Bangladesh's cabinet gave permission to Akij Group, a conglomerate, to buy Robin Resources, a Malaysian fiberboard and composites maker, for $80 million. Akij, which has interests in those sectors as well as in food and beverage, tobacco, cement, jute and textiles, was allowed to transfer $20 million to Malaysia to part-finance the acquisition, with the balance to be paid through offshore borrowings.

"We're experienced in Bangladesh," said Shamsuddin Ahmed, chief financial officer of Akij Group."Now we want to further extend to the foreign land. We want to project Bangladesh on foreign soil." Approval was conditional on continued employment requirements in Bangladesh, and the repatriation of overseas profits.

Until 2015, Bangladeshi companies were all but forbidden from making investments overseas because of government controls intended to focus available capital investment on domestic development. However, controls have been relaxed since the South Asian nation of 160 million was accorded Lower Middle Income status by the World Bank in July 2015, indicating that average annual income per capita had reached $1,026, measured by the bank's gross national income formula at 2011 values.

20171113BanglaInvestmentTable_large_580.png


The government amended the country's 1947 foreign exchange regulations in 2015, paving the way for capital account transactions, and offshore investment applications have since been considered on a case-by-case basis. Up to half have been rejected, and even the largest Bangladeshi companies remain little known outside the country. However, that could start to change as they begin spreading their wings abroad.

Central bank officials say they have drafted an "overseas investment policy" that will be finalized soon with the objective of formalizing the outward investment regime, replacing the current ad hoc approach. In the meantime, a cabinet committee on economic affairs will consider outward investment proposals based on central bank recommendations, according to Eunusur Rahman, secretary of the government's Financial Institutions Division.

20171116_DBL_Group_middle_280.jpg

Apparel producer DBL Group is opening a factory in Ethiopia to take advantage of that country’s preferential access to export markets. (Photo by A.Z.M. Anas)


Companies that have recently gained approval for overseas investment include DBL Group, a textile and clothing producer, which is spending $9.5 million to set up an apparel factory in Ethiopia that will become operational in April 2018. DBL employs 30,000 people in Bangladesh and 1,700 in Ethiopia.

Mohammed Abdul Jabbar, managing director, said that although labor was still cheaper in Bangladesh, DBL had been lured to Ethiopia by its preferential market access to the U.S. -- Ethiopian goods are eligible for duty-free access under the U.S. African Growth and Opportunity Act. "We're global," Jabbar said. "We can now have same kind of competition with international suppliers and claim 'global' price. Buyers can't give us any price they want."

Other companies that have received official approval to begin operations outside Bangladesh include BSRM Group, a Chittagong-based steelmaker, which applied in 2016 to invest $4.67 million to buy a 10% stake in a Kenyan steel company. However, the group, the country's largest steelmaker, has not yet deployed the funds. "Studies are still going on, and when everything is clear we will invest," said Aameir Alihussain, managing director.

Bangladesh has made significant economic progress in recent years, averaging annual growth in gross domestic product of 6.2% between 2007 and 2016. Moody's, a ratings agency, praised the country's economic performance in a review in April, noting its "robust and stable growth performance" and "relatively low government debt burden."

Ajit Kumar Paul, a senior official of the Bangladesh Investment Development Authority, the state investment promotion agency, said Bangladeshi companies were ready to expand outward. "Outbound investment is a need of the hour. We're now mature," he said. Paul said that priority should be given to companies that have foreign currency income.

Crushed ambitions

However, years of heavy-handed government controls have crushed the global ambitions of many Bangladeshi companies. PRAN-RFL, a diversified conglomerate, applied repeatedly for permission to build several food processing and packaging plants in India, but the central bank blocked the proposals.

Deshbandhu Group, a commodities company, sought permission in 2011 to set up a sugar mill in Brazil or Thailand, but was also blocked by the central bank. A number of other companies, including Summit Group, Meghna and Walton, have also failed to secure approval to invest overseas. In each case, the central bank said the proposals lacked detail, ruling that the desire to invest overseas was not sufficient.

Two major applications currently before the central bank will provide a strong indication of how far the state authorities are prepared to liberalize. Nitol Niloy Group, a vehicle producer, is seeking permission to invest $7 million in Gambia's banking sector, while Ha-Meem Group, a textiles producer, wants to spend $10.44 million to establish an apparel factory in Haiti. Both deals are awaiting approval. Nitol Niloy is also planning a further application for a $50 million investment in the Indian textiles industry.

Business leaders are pushing the government to liberalize further. Hafizur Rahman Khan, president of the International Business Forum of Bangladesh, said the government should allow more companies to invest overseas, perhaps with conditions such as those imposed on Akij.

"Remittances from wage-earners alone are not enough," Khan said, referring to Bangladesh's significant inward flow of funds from citizens who have migrated to work overseas. "We need to boost foreign exchange income through outbound investment, as this will help bring in dollars."

Some critics oppose widespread liberalization, arguing that domestic private investment remains sluggish. Mirza Azizul Islam, a former finance minister, said that private investment has hovered between 21% and 22% of GDP in the past eight to nine years, which equates to roughly $47 billion a year.

"Outbound investment is not desirable," said Islam, who teaches economics at BRAC University in Dhaka. He said that if investment outflows increased, foreign exchange reserves would be drained, which could expose the country to exchange rate problems.

"[The] open capital regime had a role in the Asian [financial] crisis of 1997-98," Islam said. However, he added that outward investment should be allowed in certain sectors on a "limited scale."

Sadiq Ahmed, vice chairman of the Policy Research Institute of Bangladesh, a think tank in Dhaka, said that "genuine" investors should be allowed to invest overseas, but that the government should monitor deals closely.

"You can't halt capital flight with regulations. If companies can't make profits in Bangladesh, they will find a way out," said Ahmed, a former South Asia regional director of the World Bank. The best way to fight capital flight is to improve the investment climate by simplifying local regulations, he said.

Bangladesh is one of the world's worst places to do business, having slipped by one rank to 177th of 190 economies in the World Bank's latest global ease of doing business rankings.

However, beneficiaries of the recent liberalization remain bullish about future overseas prospects. DBL is considering building a factory in America to make garments such as sweaters. Jabbar, who was educated in the U.S., said he was excited by the prospect of labeling clothes with a "made-in-America" tag.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Ec...s-rush-overseas-as-Dhaka-relaxes-rules?page=2
 
.
Good decision by the government finally. Rather than keeping millions in Banks lazy, its better to invest in other countries. But Govt must make sure, they do enough investment in Bangladesh before allowing them to invest in foreign soil.
 
. .
It's probably the right time but I hope the government is able to control it strictly as this is an easy route for people to take money out of the country.
 
.
It's probably the right time but I hope the government is able to control it strictly as this is an easy route for people to take money out of the country.

Because govt of BD is such a credible, transparent and non-corrupt institution (compared to private sector) with best interests of BD at heart and has realised a huge capex efficiency when it has hands on the liquidity levers.

This is why BD fails, you always have such a high belief in "govt"....even after all its done to you lot.
 
.
Economically I am happy that this is happening.... overseas investment is never money leaving the country.... it's a route to bigger market and always benefits the investing country...

However surprised by the timing.... the illigal BAL government given the fall that is coming maybe finding ways of moving funds out of the country. Everyone knows returning to power for BAL post Hasina will take several generation if at all...
 
.
Bangladesh has a good geographical location,it should aim to slowly join the supply chains of both Indian and East Asian economies
 
.
There’s a reason why Bangladesh ranks so low in the Doing Business Index:

http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/bangladesh

Bangladesh ranks 177. Bangladesh putting such controls on capital and foreign exchange is one of the reasons why. There will be more FDI in Bangladesh if such controls are relaxed. Good move even if it’s long overdue.
 
.
Man you astound me with your ability to say useless things. A South Asian government is corrupt? Really??

Maybe you should stop commenting on India altogether then.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/suparn...untry-while-japan-comes-in-last/#112f6ef01201

http://m.indiatoday.in/story/india-most-corrupt-nation-in-asia-pm-narendra-modi-bjp/1/972281.html

https://www.scoopwhoop.com/india-most-corrupt-country-in-asia-statistics/

Because govt of BD is such a credible, transparent and non-corrupt institution (compared to private sector) with best interests of BD at heart and has realised a huge capex efficiency when it has hands on the liquidity levers.

This is why BD fails, you always have such a high belief in "govt"....even after all its done to you lot.
 
.

Comparing a GDDS standard entity to an SDDS one (if you even know what those are) is pretty silly to begin with. But I will indulge you sure.

Maybe you can explain why BD officially claims (something as simple as) processing of 75% of its cattle herd into meat when the world maximum is 30%? (This is a big reason as to why BD can only ever hope to stay in the GDDS category for the forseeable future)

BTW, whenever India gets ranked as "most corrupt" in something...a) BD not even included in the study in first place b) its one cherry picked part of corruption (in this case bribe prevalence).

Unfortunately for BD, it is way worse (like magnitudes worse) than India when it is a) included in the study ...and b) the study is comprehensive to begin with (check out the CPI ranking or cato freedom index).

Thus the question comes up again, why be in favour of clear continued BD govt overreach of any liquidity, sponged inside or spread outside...rather than priortising improvement of that govt credibility to begin with so a) it can work towards say SDDS status and reasonable regional CPI rank so b) it can actually even be compared to India (as much improvement that India needs*) in the first place? You are effectively arguing that BD govt spending is better overall than private sector spending (of money generated by private means to begin with)....which is a poor argument that belongs to the socialist doctrine.

*which is why I would never want Indian govt overreach on liquidity controls as much as possible too.
 
Last edited:
.
Yawn

Comparing a GDDS standard entity to an SDDS one (if you even know what those are) is pretty silly to begin with. But I will indulge you sure.

Maybe you can explain why BD officially claims (something as simple as) processing of 75% of its cattle herd into meat when the world maximum is 30%? (This is a big reason as to why BD can only ever hope to stay in the GDDS category for the forseeable future)

BTW, whenever India gets ranked as "most corrupt" in something...a) BD not even included in the study in first place b) its one cherry picked part of corruption (in this case bribe prevalence).

Unfortunately for BD, it is way worse (like magnitudes worse) than India when it is a) included in the study ...and b) the study is comprehensive to begin with (check out the CPI ranking or cato freedom index).

Thus the question comes up again, why be in favour of clear continued BD govt overreach of any liquidity, sponged inside or spread outside...rather than priortising improvement of that govt credibility to begin with so a) it can work towards say SDDS status and reasonable regional CPI rank so b) it can actually even be compared to India (as much improvement that India needs*) in the first place?

*which is why I would never want Indian govt overreach on liquidity controls as much as possible too.
 
. .

Dealing again with Lalgiri's useless 'Faltu ka Gyan' and 'captain obvious' rants about how corrupt Bangladesh is - like its big news.

Who gives a flying rat's a$$? I'd rather have them develop infra and industry, even with corruption.

My God - does this guy even eat or sleep? Seems he's hanging out here all_the_time...
 
. .
Exactly bro, even the comedy factor is gone now - it's just pitiful.

I don't think he has the capacity to look beyond the surface. Then again blatant corruption in India seems invisible to him - so maybe he can't even assess the surface.

Dealing again with Lalgiri's useless 'Faltu ka Gyan' and 'captain obvious' rants about how corrupt Bangladesh is - like its big news.

Who gives a flying rat's a$$? I'd rather have them develop infra and industry, even with corruption.

My God - does this guy even eat or sleep? Seems he's hanging out here all_the_time...
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom