What's new

Bangladesh unveils nearly 38 bln USD national budget for fiscal year 2015-16

There was Akhand Bharat during Maurya Empire and there was no Bangladesh before 1971 :coffee:

If only Muryas named it Akhand Bharat.

This is Akhand Bharat

download.png


Muryas couldnt conquer half of it

Maurya_Dynasty_in_265_BCE.jpg


Moreover other kingdoms didnt want it. So Muryas disintegrated. Akhand Bharat is always there if you have cordial relation with those areas. Both India and Bangladesh is comprised of remnants of different kingdom.
 
.
Those posters are from BAl leaders and stuck on the walls by their caders.SO YES,BAL is very happy about his visit.


And who might those "People" be,since no one get to vote.o_OYou don't have to go far,I doubt that even a single BD member here get to vote.Ask anyone.So yes,by the first rule of democracy she is not elected.:-)

you better stick with the topic.

People's mandate should be respected. :)

Only if India renames itself People's Republic of Bangladesh.

The name Bangladesh will always be remembered in the pages of our history books! :P

Lol @ Indians celebrating this temporary influence they have in BD.

Once BD has sorted it's infrastructure and eliminated poverty, then expect a nationalist
government to build a powerful military that could invade the NE of India if required.

India will be made to behave by BD threat to dismember it.

The influence is far more permanent than you can imagine, and it will become constitutional with the eventuality of Bangladesh becoming a part of India. :D

NE India will supply massive land, agricultural and mineral resources.

It only has a population around 30 million and so will not adversely affect BD demographics.

I am not saying that BD should invade and annex NE but we should threaten to do so if India does not behave itself.

RAW has infiltrated every establishment of Bangladesh, Bangladesh will never be in a position to threaten us. :P

BD had enough of Pakistan and left so there you go.

It was never going to work out anyway, if only due to the geographical
separation.

India will eventually disintegrate like all muti-ethnic states have done in history.

Our nationality is more important than our ethnicity, but Bangladesh can see Sylhet, Chittagong, etc. walking out of the Bangladesh hegemony! :)

I have to agree with you on that. India will eventually disintegrate and Balkanise along linguistic and cultural identity.

Meh! Many people before you thought that, and most of them died due to old age! :P
 
.
People's mandate should be respected. :)
looks like fertility of your brain has washed away by rain,due to shortage of hair.
So as I told beofore,as people didn't get to vote and thus she isn't elected;so there no such thing as "Peoples Mandate".This government is mandated by "system",not because people choosed them.Try to read some news and get in the deeper aspects of them and constitutional legality,before you come blabbering.
 
.
looks like fertility of your brain has washed away by rain,due to shortage of hair.
So as I told beofore,as people didn't get to vote and thus she isn't elected;so there no such thing as "Peoples Mandate".This government is mandated by "system",not because people choosed them.Try to read some news and get in the deeper aspects of them and constitutional legality,before you come blabbering.

People did vote, democracy can't wait if more people in Bangladesh lacked the responsibility to come out and vote, democracy can't wait for one particular candidate unwilling to contest the election.

And performance is showing that voters made the right decision! :)
 
.
There was Akhand Bharat during Maurya Empire and there was no Bangladesh before 1971 :coffee:
When Alexander invaded india there was an independent state in place of Bangladesh and it was called 'Gangariddhi(গঙ্গারিদ্ধি)' :rofl:
additionally Sultan ShamsUddin Ilias Shah was called sultan-e-bangalah would you answer why :D
 
.
When Alexander invaded india there was an independent state in place of Bangladesh and it was called 'Gangariddhi(গঙ্গারিদ্ধি)' :rofl:
additionally Sultan ShamsUddin Ilias Shah was called sultan-e-bangalah would you answer why :D
At some point each and every region of South Asia was independent state....Punjab, Rajasthan,Maharasthra, Bengal region, South Indian states...that's not the point the point is that there was Akhand Bharat and no Bangladesh in history
 
.
At some point each and every region of South Asia was independent state....Punjab, Rajasthan,Maharasthra, Bengal region, South Indian states...that's not the point the point is that there was Akhand Bharat and no Bangladesh in history
It was not akhand bharat
It was Maurya empire :rofl:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom