EasyNow
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,015
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Why are we discussing numbers here?
This is not a question of whether Pakistan had the odds to win it's whether Pakistan should have fought the war in the first place. Why did 34000 or 55000 Pak army decide they had the right to kill Bangladeshi people particularly when the Bangalis had a just claim to the leadership??
It was a complete and utter Pakistani failure strategically, diplomatically and militarily to engage Bangladeshis in war. If you wanted to beat us you should have sent 1m troops or defeated us through a legal dispute, but using a small force and targeting civilians was idiocy and arrogance.
Niazi boasted he would change our 'nasl' with these very troops that was the level of hubris which preceded the fall of Dhaka.
This is not a question of whether Pakistan had the odds to win it's whether Pakistan should have fought the war in the first place. Why did 34000 or 55000 Pak army decide they had the right to kill Bangladeshi people particularly when the Bangalis had a just claim to the leadership??
It was a complete and utter Pakistani failure strategically, diplomatically and militarily to engage Bangladeshis in war. If you wanted to beat us you should have sent 1m troops or defeated us through a legal dispute, but using a small force and targeting civilians was idiocy and arrogance.
Niazi boasted he would change our 'nasl' with these very troops that was the level of hubris which preceded the fall of Dhaka.