Bangladesh to honour 380 Indian soldiers killed during Liberation War

[VikingRaider]

What a cuckold type people these bangus are honoring the filthy gangus.

We are actually trailing honorable Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan who gave the highest honor to Narendra Modi .

Actually we are still far behind than him . Because he gave honor to butcher Modi . And we gave honoir to whom who actually came to help us in freedom fight . Although their intention was not good , still they came and Indira Gandhi was at least not the butcher to our kashmiri Muslim brothers , and to our Uighur Muslim brothers !

So in the case of cuckoldry our Pakistani fellas ( who are dead silent about Uighur Muslim brothers ) are no different , perhaps ahead .At least we do not carry coal to new castle unlike our Pakistani friends do !

 

[Doctor Strange]

Hmm understand. So when elite class is whining for democracy by imitating westen nations, then that's all right.

When low life own in 1970 that time it was harmful for whole Pakistan.

Pakistan was created by Aristrocratic Land owner educated tax payer Muslims. Only 3% Muslims had voting rights according to India act 1935. Piss poor people had nothing to do with it. These guys dont deserve any voting rights. Just basic citizenship rights. This is the right way to go. If BD also follows this, there is no problem in democracy. But the low lives take it as guaranteed to take any rights they dont deserve. Thats the reason why BD has a failed democracy and a poor performing country. Better power transfer negotiation should have gone forward after that election. Even if power isnt transferred any secession agenda isnt justified. But the secessionist agenda was going among some socialists for some time. To quell them, the 25 March operation initiated. But India was planning this way ahead. For example cutting east and west air route by staging Ganga airliner hijacking drama.

 

[VikingRaider]

Pakistan was created by Aristrocratic Land owner educated tax payer Muslims. Only 3% Muslims had voting rights according to India act 1935.

Alright that's enough to know for me. One question, how many of these 3% were from Bangladesh/East Bengal/East Pakistan?
Would you like to provide me the information if you know this?

If BD also follows this, there is no problem in democracy. But the low lives take it as guaranteed to take any rights they dont deserve. Thats the reason why BD has a failed democracy

Okay if BD follows the system then who will be counted as Aristrocratic and who will be counted as low life? Please elaborate!

But TBH, Iike the idea of socrates. Democracy is actually garbage and I don't think outside some western countries anyone is doing well in this system.

Recently we saw that how so called biggest democratic country India showed it's reality by electing Hindutva and the result is the kashmir massacre, and oppression on Muslims in india.

Thats the reason why BD has a failed democracy and a poor performing country.

Yes I agree, democracy in Bangladesh was never a successful thing. But what do you mean by poor performing country? BD is doing better than Pakistan in various sectors.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

What a cuckold type people these bangus are honoring the filthy gangus.

Actually they are being honest. They were birthed by the mating of Indian Army with Bangla Muktos. That is a fact. BD would not exist as a state without the illegitimate affair between IA and B-Mukhtos.

 

[Bilal9]

But TBH, Iike the idea of socrates. Democracy is actually garbage and I don't think outside some western countries anyone is doing well in this system.

Democracy or 'one man-one vote' works where people are educated and can make up their own mind to actually choose leaders using diductive reasoning.

In our countries in South Asia, votes can be bought by paying someone one lungi or one Sari, or even by feeding them Chai-cookie snacks. It is a farce in our countries.

Read up some of Lee, Kuan Yew's books sometime on the Internet. I consider this Singaporean leader the greatest statesman to ever live who recognized the indiscipline of Asians and problems to govern them. He was the sole reason, Singapore became a first world industrial powerhouse today, from a filthy port and backwater in the early fifties...

Actually they are being honest. They were birthed by the mating of Indian Army with Bangla Muktos. That is a fact. BD would not exist as a state without the illegitimate affair between IA and B-Mukhtos.

It is clear you are smoking something special, but you will obviously benefit from the concentrated Mary-Jane liquid THC available now...and produce entertaining posts like this.

 

[Adonis]

Even though the country is Muslim and is now subservient to India, have lost their sovereignty, they still want to stay in that state of denial. People who surrender their sovereignty for security deserve niether sovereignty not security.
If bengalis had stayed with us, they most likely would’ve been on top government positions today and would’ve been a nuclear nation dictating their own terms to India. Abhi bhi Sharam kar lo kuch

Mate it's your past elites who could not keep Bengalis with you...not their fault..you never gave them their dues and dealt with them with bias and prejudice.
On being nuclear nation "Dictating..blah blah"...Seriously mate? Does Pakistan do it to India?....they snatched away Kashmir without firing a single bullet and you are blabbering about Nuclear weapons?....Laminate them and hang them on the walls of your Army's officer's mess.

 

[Doctor Strange]

Alright that's enough to know for me. One question, how many of these 3% were from Bangladesh/East Bengal/East Pakistan?
Would you like to provide me the information if you know this?

Currently not interested to dig in that.

Okay if BD follows the system then who will be counted as Aristrocratic and who will be counted as low life? Please elaborate!

But TBH, Iike the idea of socrates. Democracy is actually garbage and I don't think outside some western countries anyone is doing well in this system.

Recently we saw that how so called biggest democratic country India showed it's reality by electing Hindutva and the result is the kashmir massacre, and oppression on Muslims in india.

A man can wish and wish. The massive force will take over what it desires. BD can create its own class. Based on education, job, business, taxation, land etc. Currently BD has mechanism which denies side effects of democracy. For example BAL root level is total low lives. But it tries to install capable people on top, even from outside of party. The wisdom came from men to produce BAKSAL wasnt outright idea after all.

Yes I agree, democracy in Bangladesh was never a successful thing. But what do you mean by poor performing country? BD is doing better than Pakistan in various sectors.

Pakistan isnt the standard here. BD could perform well in last 48 years. This faulty democracy and unworthy people on top, kept BD behind. For example, Pakistan faced wars. But BD faced internal political instability. Though the propaganda suggests BD is doing better, the ground reality doesnt change. My priority is to see vibrant middle class in BD, which keeps the country afloat. Thats missing in BD, compared to Pakistan. And BD doesnt have a city life outside Dhaka. Compare that to Pakistan. GDP, Per capita income etc doesnt make sense to me.

https://www.menabytes.com/pakistani-startups-next-big-thing/

 

[SIPRA]

Thats missing in BD, compared to Pakistan. And BD doesnt have a city life outside Dhaka. Compare that to Pakistan. GDP, Per capita income etc doesnt make sense to me.

Tau Bhai, phir idhar hamaray paas hi aa jao.

 

[VikingRaider]

For example BAL root level is total low lives. But it tries to install capable people on top, even from outside of party. The wisdom came from men to produce BAKSAL wasnt outright idea after all.

Okay understand. Yes I admit that BAKSAL by bangabandhu sheikh Mujibur Rahman was not realistic idea at all. It look that he had no other way to do it instantly when the country was in a big crisis ( as we know like uncontrollable market, anarchy in various places and specially he lost control on uncle Toms of his own party), indeed he tried to control everything so wanted to took control on own hand by not calculating the reality ( games inside curtain played by enemy using the uncle Tom of that time's AL) behind it.

So although his intention was noble ( I believe so) , but the decision was not a right decision at all.

He was a great leader, but not even a good administrator at all , he most of time prefered emotion over logic, and took many decisions emotionally and that's not useful for an administrator ( such emotions are good for leaders though when his nation is in crisis) , it's a well known fact.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Pakistan is still sore about 1971. They are still coming to terms with what happened. This is why you get comments like this.



India could've done that in 1971 but what would it gain? Regardless, good relations between Bangladesh and India is only a recent phenomenon. Relations were quite rocky for a long time before they got better.

Not really. Bangladesh is not even 1/6 the size of Pakistan. Not even 17% the size of Pakistan. On top of that they are nearly 3000 mms away from us too.

Perhaps india is still sore and butt-hurt about 1947.................when over 37% of former indian territory was annexed and conquered to create Pakistan...........something which indians still feel bitter about, along with a 1000 years of Muslim rule........

Pakistan is still sore about 1971. They are still coming to terms with what happened. This is why you get comments like this.



India could've done that in 1971 but what would it gain? Regardless, good relations between Bangladesh and India is only a recent phenomenon. Relations were quite rocky for a long time before they got better.

@The Eagle @waz @Dubious @Horus @WAJsal @Irfan Baloch

The hyper-ugly little weiner men from the East have started up again. Time to shut them up again.