DarkPrince
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,281
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I sense Sour grapes here.
You should talk about our corruption and mismanagement not luxury car and villas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I sense Sour grapes here.
You should talk about our corruption and mismanagement not luxury car and villas.
Well you are certainly much more corrupt than us.
I don't hate Pakistan, FAR from it. If I had any power in foreign policy making inside BD, I would certainly try making Pakistan the best economic partner as well as defence tech buying partner. Would have had very positive growth for both countries to grow together with each others cooperation. If we had good relation BD could also have had a say over what defence gears PK can sell to Myanmar if BD can have major buying share of PK defence exports and BD could look to PK's interest too. I see PK as country being far enough with no border sharing making it zero threat and close enough to have very close economic relationship.Think that you are still undecided, to love or hate the country, or hate to love, or love to hate...something in between, was actually replying to @Homo Sapiens regarding the cleanliness in Lahore w.r.t Dacca. That was not about just roads...though the first thing you observe in a city are the roads, the road cleanliness and discipline.
In higher education Pakistan is doing well actually there are 10 Pakistan universities in QS top 300 Asian ranking, Bangladesh has got 1 university in that ranking.
Many other things HDI has smaller differences except for the infant mortality, Pakistan rank is higher like in per capita income, literacy rate is higher for B'desh. Hope it hasn't got the same benchmark as India had...anyone who can scribble his name in India is considered as literate.
ভাই, ঐ তামিল সাইকো টা সবকিছুর নাটের গুরু । ও নিজে সারাক্ষন ওঁত পেতে থাকে কোন কিছু একটা নিয়ে এখানে ঝামেলা তৈরী করার, আর সুযোগ পাওয়া মাত্রই ও চারিদিকে ট্যাগ করা শুরু করে দল ভারী করে ঝাঁপিয়ে পরার জন্য । এই থ্রেডটা এতবড় আর তিক্ত হওয়ার একমাত্র কারন হলো ও । সব থ্রেডে একই কাহিনী । ও খুব ধুর্ততার সাথে যে কোন পুরোপুরি বাংলাদেশ বিষয়ক থ্রেডকে বাংলাদেশ বনাম পাকিস্তান বাকযুদ্ধ বানিয়ে ফেলে । ওর প্রধান অস্র হলো নিজে একগাদা বস্তাপচা রাবিশ পোস্ট করা আর চারিদিকে ট্যাগিং শুরু করা । যাদেরকে ও ট্যাগ করে তাদের বাংলাদেশ বিরোধী মনোভাবটাও ওই উসকে দিয়েছে দিনের পর দিন । এটা এক অদ্ভুত মনোজাগতিক বিকার । দেখে শুনে মনে হয় ও দীর্ঘমেয়াদী এক প্রতিশোধ মিশনে নেমেছে বাংলাদেশী পোস্টারদের বিরুদ্ধে যারা ওকে পাত্তা দেয় না । ওর একমাত্র ধ্যানগ্ব্যন কিভাবে আমাদেরকে শায়েস্তা করা যায় । ও যে বাংলাদেশের সবকিছু ভুল, মিথ্যা প্রমান করতে আদাজল খেয়ে নেমেছে, এর একমাত্র কারন হলো ও আমাদেরকে ভুল, মিথ্যা প্রমান করতে চায়, আমাদেরকে অন্যদের দ্বারা অপদস্থ করিয়ে প্রতিশোধের আনন্দ নিতে চায় । ওর পোস্টের ধরন আর ট্যাগিং এর বহর দেখে এটা সুস্পষ্ট ।
Whatever, we should not fall for this trap. Pakistan is a distant country, whether they are ahead of us or not, matter little for us. If someone says Pakistan is a better, prosperous country that Bangladesh, just say 'yes, I agree', to avoid these hassle.We know very well what is our strength and what is our weakness. Make the troll brigade out of job.
@UKBengali @Mage @Black_cats @Ashik Mahmud @TopCat @Michael Corleone @Species @PersonasNonGrata @sbmc27 @Cycle Macson @BDforever
I don't hate Pakistan, FAR from it. If I had any power in foreign policy making inside BD, I would certainly try making Pakistan the best economic partner as well as defence tech buying partner. Would have had very positive growth for both countries to grow together with each others cooperation. If we had good relation BD could also have had a say over what defence gears PK can sell to Myanmar if BD can have major buying share of PK defence exports and BD could look to PK's interest too. I see PK as country being far enough with no border sharing making it zero threat and close enough to have very close economic relationship.
I see having good economic and defence cooperation as a massive opportunity. BD could reduce dependancy on India and import raw materials for our export basket RMG from Pakistan where it's available and cheap a lot too because of currency devaluation. BD can also up it's defence a lot by learning and buying from Pakistan. Our relation would have put a lot of pressure on India on Teesta (major deal for our country), have them be on our side instead of pretending to be neutral all the while being on Burma's side.
I am not being "against" Pakistan. I am simply putting forth argument that just because beautiful wide roads aren't nearly as available in BD, doesn't mean BD is worse. We are good at what I consider more important than having the world class highways that remains nearly empty when you could have just made narrower highways with plans for future widening when the need comes and spends the extra money on basic human needs. Things like literacy, child mortality and so forth are very important, much more than wide world class highways. You can of course show them off and thats good that you have them but it's certainly not an argument against BD just because BD decided to spend money on where I think is more important.
Why should it even get the lion share of Punjab? as far as I know, most of the development spending is done by state govt. because aside from state govt. own tax resources, a big chunk is obtained from federal govt. in form of state transfer. Punjab being the largest state get the majority development budget(own+federal transfer). So Lahore not only getting a lion share of Punjab but also a big portion of Pakistan as a whole.Punjab has 110 million people, out of which 11 million in Lahore, 10 percent of total.So a city which have only 10 percent population is getting 58 percent of development spending.Isn't it pervasive? Looks like Rest of Punjab has turned into another East Pakistan.Lahore gets lion share of Punjab's development budget not Pakistan's.
Lol !! B'deshis should eat the humble pie now...BTW that was quick.
The only defeat Pakistan faced was 71, when 34,000 Pakistani troops surrendered. Although it was a humiliating defeat but we should be sane enough to accept the factors that contributed in that defeat. Some to mention includes,
- Home ground was 1500 km away.
- No direct or connected supply route from home ground.
- The turf was surrounded by enemy home ground from 3 sides and the sea had entire coast line spread for thousands of miles of enemy, not to forget the air route was surrounded by enemy too and it was ban for any Pakistani military or civilians flights.
- The turf was crawling with hostile terrorists who were trained and pushed in by indians, the size of these terrorists alone was 15 times bigger than that of Pakistani soldiers.
- The population was brainwashed and rebellious.
Years after that Pakistan had a skirmishes with Soviets and Israel and Pakistan was successful. Then again Pakistan had skirmish with India and Pakistan liberated commendable chunk of occupied Kashmir which was later lost due to political pressure, still a strategic peak was kept under control even today and it oversee entire posts of indian forces and serves as excellent vantage point for the road where the supplies goes to Siachen. From 2001 until 2018 there are several standoffs and skirmishes where Pakistan's result is way better.
Exactly, I have seen both American interstate highways and Chinese inter-provincial expressways. Vast majority of them are 4 lane. Some are 6 lane and some are 2 lane. They being the largest and 2nd largest economy considers 4 lane to be appropriate for their need. While Pakistan is building 6 lane motorway by borrowing money with high interest rate. Pakistan's motor vehicle fleet is a fraction of America or China. So it is certain that these 6 lane motorway will be under utilized for many decades. Not only that, Pakistan has to bear maintainence cost of these motorways without getting any extra benefit. They could have built 4 lane motorway cheaper than 6 lane motorway and put those extra money to build many thousands primary schools. But priorities are lopsided in Pakistan it seems. In all account, these are turning out to be white elephant projects whose pain Pakistanis will feel when interest payment will start biting.We are good at what I consider more important than having the world class highways that remains nearly empty when you could have just made narrower highways with plans for future widening when the need comes and spends the extra money on basic human needs.
Maybe after Pakistan regains its sovereignty from US drone strikes.
Given Pakistan higher population your per capita GDP is already lower than ours. I fail to see the reason for chest thumping on your part.
Absolute size of economy is a good comparison but only in context of other factor being equal.
Per capita GDP/GNP is a traditional method of comparison between countries. I don’t even know why I am even writing this basic statement....
Let BD look forward and best wishes to others, we don’t have anything further to prove.
Why should it even get the lion share of Punjab? as far as I know, most of the development spending is done by state govt. because aside from state govt. own tax resources, a big chunk is obtained from federal govt. in form of state transfer. Punjab being the largest state get the majority development budget(own+federal transfer). So Lahore not only getting a lion share of Punjab but also a big portion of Pakistan as a whole.Punjab has 110 million people, out of which 11 million in Lahore, 10 percent of total.So a city which have only 10 percent population is getting 58 percent of development spending.Isn't it pervasive? Looks like Rest of Punjab has turned into another East Pakistan.
You are right, now rewind a bit and take a look at why the war took place in the first place. Had those tribal generals of Pakistan Army didn't get influenced by traitor Bhutto and handed over the power to the elected representatives of Pakistan in March 1971, the war would have never taken place.
Now rewind even further. There was a civilian aircraft hijacking in IoK in January 1971 where the hijackers belonged to a Kashmiri separatist group. While Sheikh Mujib asked them to condemn the incident, the military junta of Pakistan, again under the influence of traitor Bhutto, hailed the hijackers as national heroes. This eventually prompted India to impose a no fly zone over its territory for all Pakistani aircraft which later significantly affected the logistical and troop movements of Pakistan military in the war.
Analyse these chain of events. Your leaders have always fell into the trap of Indians and the local traitors and later on they successfully convinced you to believe whatever they portray. This is no different to how some Pakistanis here easily get coaxed by the Indian trolls and rally behind them in this subforum.
There is nothing to show off in skirmishes with Indian troops. They are timid bunch and will just flee the battlefield if there is no air support. We annihilated them in 2001 but that's nothing to show off.
Talking about actual conflicts, in the wars before 1971 when we were part of Pakistan, Pakistan successfully added 40% of Kashmir to its territory from India. In the wars after 1971, after we left Pakistan, it handed over the strategic Siachen Glacier and adjoining areas to India.
Politically, we have sustained pro-Bangladeshi governments in the neighbouring West Bengal and Tripura states for decades while being able to steadily increase the percentage of Muslim population in Assam.
How is it that Bangladesh which has recently graduated from LDC category was able to secure its preferential treatment from EU and US on their RMG exports?? How long are they valid??
What will be the impact on their RMG exports when these handout are withdrawn like the ESP plus and EBA initiatives and they have to compete with India, China and Vietnam etc.
Even India and China have extended their own handouts and am sure will be withdrawn considering that it is impacting their own RMG sector competitiveness.
With most of their export basket being predominantly RMG products, BD stands vulnerable to competitive pressures. They still have some breathing room left to diversity their export basket before post handout regime kicks in. It is a great opportunity for BD to shift gears to other areas and sectors which they can stand out and compete with others.
No , nothing wrong in it and does not hit ego but then don't complain and have patience as to why Paksitani comments subsequently to prove it right or wrong whatever is being said .
OK, I agree, Pakistan is a richer country than Bangladesh. No need to put down Bangladesh. Just post beautiful picture of Pakistan here so we can see them.