What's new

Bangladesh plans to curb 'digital opium' of social media

24 Hours

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2015
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
2
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
AFP, Dhaka

upload_2018-3-30_13-22-23.png


Bangladesh wants to limit the amount of time its young people spend on social media, an official said Thursday, flagging plans to curb access to apps it considers "digital opium".

The telecoms regulator blamed excessive use of Facebook and other popular social media platforms for distracting tens of millions of students from their studies.

"They spend hours on their smartphones," said Shahjahan Mahmood, chairman of the Bangladesh Telecommunications and Regulatory Commission.

"It's hampering their lives socially and academically," he told AFP, likening social media use to a "digital opium addiction".

Like in other parts of the world, social media use is hugely popular among teenagers in Bangladesh, despite only half the population having access to the internet.

Facebook provides access to a limited version of its platform for free, allowing even the poorest of Bangladesh's 160 million people to log onto the social media platform.

There has been no suggestion of authorities cracking down on Facebook, but Mahmood said the regulator was planning to raise prices to access social media applications in a bid to drive down usage.

He said a distinction would be made to ensure access to academic, business and research websites was not affected.

"We've started planning at the macro level about how to implement that," he said.

"It sounds restrictive now, but in the long run it would be practically very useful for the country, especially for the young people."

He also floated the idea of introducing content filtering on young people's smartphones but admitted it would be "challenging" to police such activity.

Most Bangladeshis access the internet via smartphones. Last month, the country's internet bandwidth was raised from 3G to 4G.

Bangladesh imposed a three-week blackout on social media, including Facebook, in early 2015 amid demonstrations by opposition supporters against the government.
 
. . . .
AFP, Dhaka

View attachment 462609

Bangladesh wants to limit the amount of time its young people spend on social media, an official said Thursday, flagging plans to curb access to apps it considers "digital opium".

The telecoms regulator blamed excessive use of Facebook and other popular social media platforms for distracting tens of millions of students from their studies.

"They spend hours on their smartphones," said Shahjahan Mahmood, chairman of the Bangladesh Telecommunications and Regulatory Commission.

"It's hampering their lives socially and academically," he told AFP, likening social media use to a "digital opium addiction".

Like in other parts of the world, social media use is hugely popular among teenagers in Bangladesh, despite only half the population having access to the internet.

Facebook provides access to a limited version of its platform for free, allowing even the poorest of Bangladesh's 160 million people to log onto the social media platform.

There has been no suggestion of authorities cracking down on Facebook, but Mahmood said the regulator was planning to raise prices to access social media applications in a bid to drive down usage.

He said a distinction would be made to ensure access to academic, business and research websites was not affected.

"We've started planning at the macro level about how to implement that," he said.

"It sounds restrictive now, but in the long run it would be practically very useful for the country, especially for the young people."

He also floated the idea of introducing content filtering on young people's smartphones but admitted it would be "challenging" to police such activity.

Most Bangladeshis access the internet via smartphones. Last month, the country's internet bandwidth was raised from 3G to 4G.

Bangladesh imposed a three-week blackout on social media, including Facebook, in early 2015 amid demonstrations by opposition supporters against the government.

totally agree. It is poison to society. It does more harm than good. There are many other ways to connect with people. In western countries, people are disconnected with family and friends. We south Asian likes to be with people and we have 100 occasions to connect. Use them our great culture has provided us all the opportunities to do show off and meet people.
 
. .
Yeah. And what else is left?

With the current political situation and BD making inroad as a autocracy, I think this step is just a vile conspiracy to curb freedom of expression.

Government effectively controls the media, now they are targeting social media, as it's the last space where people can express if needed anonymously. So what else is left?

Sorry, can't support this move in the context of BD.

P.S : I already don't use any social media like Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp etc. PDF would be the nearest thing to a social media that I am involved in. And already thinking of quitting here.
 
Last edited:
. .
AFP, Dhaka

View attachment 462609

Bangladesh wants to limit the amount of time its young people spend on social media, an official said Thursday, flagging plans to curb access to apps it considers "digital opium".

The telecoms regulator blamed excessive use of Facebook and other popular social media platforms for distracting tens of millions of students from their studies.

"They spend hours on their smartphones," said Shahjahan Mahmood, chairman of the Bangladesh Telecommunications and Regulatory Commission.

"It's hampering their lives socially and academically," he told AFP, likening social media use to a "digital opium addiction".

Like in other parts of the world, social media use is hugely popular among teenagers in Bangladesh, despite only half the population having access to the internet.

Facebook provides access to a limited version of its platform for free, allowing even the poorest of Bangladesh's 160 million people to log onto the social media platform.

There has been no suggestion of authorities cracking down on Facebook, but Mahmood said the regulator was planning to raise prices to access social media applications in a bid to drive down usage.

He said a distinction would be made to ensure access to academic, business and research websites was not affected.

"We've started planning at the macro level about how to implement that," he said.

"It sounds restrictive now, but in the long run it would be practically very useful for the country, especially for the young people."

He also floated the idea of introducing content filtering on young people's smartphones but admitted it would be "challenging" to police such activity.

Most Bangladeshis access the internet via smartphones. Last month, the country's internet bandwidth was raised from 3G to 4G.

Bangladesh imposed a three-week blackout on social media, including Facebook, in early 2015 amid demonstrations by opposition supporters against the government.

BAN these social media sites or allow limited use.

Its not easy to a make phone call anymore. :hitwall:

As I hold the phone on my hand to make an important call I notice a " Facebook Notification", curious mind makes me tap on the Facebook Icon and BAM
I will waste a good 10 minutes reading people saying s**t about others ( have to reply if some of that s**t is directed at me !), famous people quotes, how to improve your life, fake news, some guy lecturing what you should or shouldn't do, life hacks, and watch the trendiest video.

And I still haven't made my important phone call !!

This happens way too often.
 
Last edited:
. .
I question the motivations of this initiative but nonetheless, social media is potentially very destructive.

I have to agree with some of the dissenting voices here. Banning will not fix the (perceived) problem...banning (esp something fuelled with addiction and thus massive chain-reaction demand) never does. Prohibition, drug wars etc show too many sobering examples.

There should never be a nanny state taking over the role and responsibility of parents and larger society. It is massive slippery slope and never ever leads to good things in the long run.

The fix lies as always with keeping/promoting strong families, good moral upbringing (with the ability to handle response to disruptive influences happening quicker and quicker in the modern tech world) and strong community and societies. God, Family and Country (or their equivalent proxies) basically.

When this is broken, the vices have always seeped in through the cracks...it is not a new phenomenon, just the accelerants are higher velocity now. A case can be made with that in mind for temporary mitigation, but again bandaids do not solve cancers.
 
.
eventually humans have to come to grip with social media. banning is a short term fix. you will ban facebook. there will some mini-book or pdf where folks will socialize
 
.
eventually humans have to come to grip with social media. banning is a short term fix. you will ban facebook. there will some mini-book or pdf where folks will socialize

They will just go to pornhub or something thats not banned, and those places will offer ways to gather there relatively under the radar....and simply migrate to something else if thats banned later.

This is already happening with youtube self-banning content it deems inappropriate (but allowing the equivalents to flourish from another political end it supports @Desert Fox ).... the content providers are simply setting up shop in less than ideal places elsewhere, and the average exposure to even more "unsavoury" stuff occurs at greater frequency...if thats supposed to be what is stopped for the "social good".

Free market demand and supply will always find a way unless you physically want to go ahead and remove the physical technology itself (computers, internet connections, everthing etc)...i.e kill the 90% perceived good/neutral to get at the 10% perceived bad.....rather than promote the good from the demand end in the first place so a society becomes organically resistant to corruption and vice.
 
.
They will just go to pornhub or something thats not banned, and those places will offer ways to gather there relatively under the radar....and simply migrate to something else if thats banned later.

This is already happening with youtube self-banning content it deems inappropriate (but allowing the equivalents to flourish from another political end it supports @Desert Fox ).... the content providers are simply setting up shop in less than ideal places elsewhere, and the average exposure to even more "unsavoury" stuff occurs at greater frequency...if thats supposed to be what is stopped for the "social good".

Free market demand and supply will always find a way unless you physically want to go ahead and remove the physical technology itself (computers, internet connections, everthing etc)...i.e kill the 90% perceived good/neutral to get at the 10% perceived bad.....rather than promote the good from the demand end in the first place so a society becomes organically resistant to corruption and vice.
Not sure how that's gonna work though. People don't exactly go to those sites to watch videos about the second amendment :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom