Bangladesh Navy

[DalalErMaNodi]

https://www.facebook.com/360739031170472/posts/781145995796438

 

[The Ronin]

https://www.facebook.com/360739031170472/posts/781145995796438

Kinda busy so can you please tell me if she's really telling the same thing in this video?

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

Kinda busy so can you please tell me if she's really telling the same thing in this video?

Yes.... Verbatim.

 

[Destranator]

Yes.... Verbatim.

BAF...embodiment of placing the cart before the horse.

 

[The Ronin]

Yes.... Verbatim.

So i guess we gotta wait more for new frigates assuming these "local" systems will be installed in the new ships. Wonder who is actually giving tech for naval gun and torpedo to this tiny country with small budget.

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

So i guess we gotta wait more for new frigates assuming these "local" systems will be installed in the new ships. Wonder who is actually giving tech for naval gun and torpedo to this tiny country with small budget.

Hasn't IFF already been installed on trial basis on 5 Vessels ?



I suspect the budget isn't all that small, navy has PMO's ear.... Blue Economy and all,... Not to forget the monkeys insatiable hard-on for St. Martin's Island.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Hasn't IFF already been installed on trial basis on 5 Vessels ?



I suspect the budget isn't all that small, navy has PMO's ear.... Blue Economy and all,... Not to forget the monkeys insatiable hard-on for St. Martin's Island.

St Martin isn’t even a strategic interest. Just a blob of land with crabs in the beach.
As for the blue economy, there’s still no proven reserve, all theoretical

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

St Martin isn’t even a strategic interest. Just a blob of land with crabs in the beach.
As for the blue economy, there’s still no proven reserve, all theoretical

Nigga, St. Martin's is an Issue of utmost importance because it alters the line and the angle at which our Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is demarcated....


That is precisely why Myanmar has been trying to claim St. Martin's as theirs, so that they have the bear minimum discourse going and then they can file for a re-evaluation of the EEZ citing disputed territory.



There's always more to everything in the dirty game of international geopolitics.

 

[The Ronin]

St Martin isn’t even a strategic interest. Just a blob of land with crabs in the beach.
As for the blue economy, there’s still no proven reserve, all theoretical

Depends on survey. Even if there's no reserve, we still got an area of 19,467 sq km, the four-fifth of the total area of 25,602 sq km disputed maritime boundary and that blob of land had part in that.

"However, Myanmar claimed that St. Martin's Island was a special circumstance in that it was located directly in front of the Myanmar coast and within the traditional 12 nautical mile territorial sea limit of Bangladesh. Therefore, Myanmar contended that the island should not warrant full consideration in terms of having its own relative territorial sea, EEZ and continental shelf.

Essential to Bangladesh's argument was that St. Martin's Island, which lies approximately six nautical miles south of Bangladesh, has a sustainable fishing economy, permanent population of approximately 7,000 people and a tourism industry that draws in over 360,000 tourists a year (Judgement 2012: 49, para. 143). In this contention, the Tribunal opted for the middle ground. It awarded St. Martin's Island its own 12 nautical mile territorial sea, but did not allow for its own relative EEZ or continental shelf."

"Furthermore, Judge Gao argued that effect should be given to St. Martin's Island in the delimitation of Bangladesh's territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf “by reason of its size, its large permanent population, its important economic life, its strategic importance and, most importantly, its geographical location only 4.547 nautical miles from Bangladesh's mainland territory” (Gao 2012: 33). Judge Gao agrees with the Tribunal that St. Martin's Island should have a 12 nautical mile EEZ.

However, while the Tribunal concluded that St. Martin's Island would have no effect on the EEZ and continental shelf claims of Bangladesh, Judge Gao contends that the island should still partially effect the EEZ and continental shelf. The full-effect in Bangladesh's claim would block the outward-projection of Myanmar's sea territory because of the island's proximity to the Myanmar coast. Thus, Judge Gao proposes a more equitable solution, in which, only a half-effect of the island is accounted for (see Appendix Figure 5: Recommended Effect of St. Martin's Island from Judge Zhiguo Gao)."

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

 

[Michael Corleone]

Depends on survey. Even if there's no reserve, we still got an area of 19,467 sq km, the four-fifth of the total area of 25,602 sq km disputed maritime boundary and that blob of land had part in that.

"However, Myanmar claimed that St. Martin's Island was a special circumstance in that it was located directly in front of the Myanmar coast and within the traditional 12 nautical mile territorial sea limit of Bangladesh. Therefore, Myanmar contended that the island should not warrant full consideration in terms of having its own relative territorial sea, EEZ and continental shelf.

Essential to Bangladesh's argument was that St. Martin's Island, which lies approximately six nautical miles south of Bangladesh, has a sustainable fishing economy, permanent population of approximately 7,000 people and a tourism industry that draws in over 360,000 tourists a year (Judgement 2012: 49, para. 143). In this contention, the Tribunal opted for the middle ground. It awarded St. Martin's Island its own 12 nautical mile territorial sea, but did not allow for its own relative EEZ or continental shelf."

"Furthermore, Judge Gao argued that effect should be given to St. Martin's Island in the delimitation of Bangladesh's territorial sea, EEZ, and continental shelf “by reason of its size, its large permanent population, its important economic life, its strategic importance and, most importantly, its geographical location only 4.547 nautical miles from Bangladesh's mainland territory” (Gao 2012: 33). Judge Gao agrees with the Tribunal that St. Martin's Island should have a 12 nautical mile EEZ.

However, while the Tribunal concluded that St. Martin's Island would have no effect on the EEZ and continental shelf claims of Bangladesh, Judge Gao contends that the island should still partially effect the EEZ and continental shelf. The full-effect in Bangladesh's claim would block the outward-projection of Myanmar's sea territory because of the island's proximity to the Myanmar coast. Thus, Judge Gao proposes a more equitable solution, in which, only a half-effect of the island is accounted for (see Appendix Figure 5: Recommended Effect of St. Martin's Island from Judge Zhiguo Gao)."

View attachment 690192

View attachment 690193

View attachment 690194

View attachment 690195

View attachment 690197

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

What are your opinion? Don’t you think Bangladesh lost out a lot of territory going into a lawsuit with Burma? As compared to with India where we got 50-50?

 

[SpaceMan18]

Nigga, St. Martin's is an Issue of utmost importance because it alters the line and the angle at which our Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is demarcated....


That is precisely why Myanmar has been trying to claim St. Martin's as theirs, so that they have the bear minimum discourse going and then they can file for a re-evaluation of the EEZ citing disputed territory.



There's always more to everything in the dirty game of international geopolitics.

I agree , we have to protect what we have we can't let some sandal wearing Ak swinging leaf eating monkeys take away our EEZ

So i guess we gotta wait more for new frigates assuming these "local" systems will be installed in the new ships. Wonder who is actually giving tech for naval gun and torpedo to this tiny country with small budget.

China maybe ?

 

[Bilal9]

St Martin isn’t even a strategic interest. Just a blob of land with crabs in the beach.
As for the blue economy, there’s still no proven reserve, all theoretical

Well - unless you put in a floating Naval base off the beach for both Navy and Coast Guard patrols and/or put in early-warning-radars in there. I don't think we should allow more than half the island as tourist trap. Hopefully the Navy has bigger plans.

Just some thoughts...

Negga you an exhibitionist

View attachment 690521




Just get a ventilator for your Dangly Bits, Problem solved, Your welcome.

 

[The Ronin]

What are your opinion? Don’t you think Bangladesh lost out a lot of territory going into a lawsuit with Burma? As compared to with India where we got 50-50?

Even if we did we had no other options left judging by the situation we were in that time. Bilateral talks or using muscle weren't choice either thanks to our benevolent leaders who suck at negotiation and lack balls. I mean look at how we are dragging issues like Rohingya, Teesta for decades. And the way Myanmar is acting, don't expect them to come and solve anything on discussion table. ITLOS's verdict solved the matter quicker than previous two options, now you can focus on development more are and economy gets a boost. Another problem was both India and Myanmar's claim.

If you notice both were trying to choke us with their claims, cutting us off from int'l water. Which also confirms both snakes working together against us while talking about "friendship" BS. So it was best to go to ITLOS. The verdict from internationally recognized organization made our maritime territory and boundary official and gave us legal rights on what is ours. So if someone misadventure in our territory or war/conflict arise to get more area from us int'l community will only follow ITLOS's verdict. Just like the UN resolution on NK in Azerbaijan's case.

I don't see ITLOS took anyone's side. As you can see in the previous post the judge took a middle ground on BD-MM's claim too so both parties got half of their claim. I think it was possible to engage MM in conflict that time when they didn't have JF-17 and Mig-29 with air-to-ground attack capability but we wouldn't get any int'l support on that and our damage/loss would have been no less than the Burmese.

Hasn't IFF already been installed on trial basis on 5 Vessels ?

Yes.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Even if we did we had no other options left judging by the situation we were in that time. Bilateral talks or using muscle weren't choice either thanks to our benevolent leaders who suck at negotiation and lack balls. I mean look at how we are dragging issues like Rohingya, Teesta for decades. And the way Myanmar is acting, don't expect them to come and solve anything on discussion table. ITLOS's verdict solved the matter quicker than previous two options, now you can focus on development more are and economy gets a boost. Another problem was both India and Myanmar's claim.

If you notice both were trying to choke us with their claims, cutting us off from int'l water. Which also confirms both snakes working together against us while talking about "friendship" BS. So it was best to go to ITLOS. The verdict from internationally recognized organization made our maritime territory and boundary official and gave us legal rights on what is ours. So if someone misadventure in our territory or war/conflict arise to get more area from us int'l community will only follow ITLOS's verdict. Just like the UN resolution on NK in Azerbaijan's case.

I don't see ITLOS took anyone's side. As you can see in the previous post the judge took a middle ground on BD-MM's claim too so both parties got half of their claim. I think it was possible to engage MM in conflict that time when they didn't have JF-17 and Mig-29 with air-to-ground attack capability but we wouldn't get any int'l support on that and our damage/loss would have been no less than the Burmese.



Yes.

Have a feeling caretaker govt. would have been reckless about this then. Judging they sent 2 of the 6 total surface warfare fleet from the time

 

[SpaceMan18]

Just saw the Japanese roll out a new frigate today , saw the French roll out theirs weeks ago.

And i'm over here wondering what's going with our next gen frigate procurement, looks like we will be waiting for a while cause we're always 1 billion years behind everyone