I see very little difference between what Shivaji did and what our own Isa Khan did, both fought against the Mughals, both resorted to assymetrical warfare (guerilla tactics) and both made alliances with communities belonging to different faiths. The only difference we will hold Isa Khan as a hero because he was a Bengali Muslim, whilst Shivaji was a Marathi Hindu.
Your claim is totally wrong.isa khan didn't invade mughal empire ,but Akbar wanted to capture Bengal so isa khan just protested .
What will Bangladeshi army do if india want to annex Bangladesh? They will fight for self defense right?
Shivaji was trouble maker and raider, he was anti Islamic who betrayed against Muslim mughal regime, make trouble ,looted and robbed innocent peoples . so how can you compare isa Khan with shivaji?
Will you compare Muslim countries too with terrorists like isis? I hope not!
Shivaji was nothing but a terrorist like Isis.
And and shivaji had Maratha empire? So Isis has self claimed khilafat, but in reality Isis is dajjal I believe .
So comparing shivaji with isa khan make no sense!
Do you have any proof that any of the Muslims I named were Munafiqs like the people you said just now, making Takfeer is a serious thing in Islam and it's not something you should do lightly.
The order of Islam is not to revolt against Muslim rulers until they are not banning you from prayers like namaz ,Roza ,hajja zakat etc.
Or if the nominal Muslim ruler is imposing shirk e aqida then revolt is fine.
So the nominal Muslim companions of shivaji was betraying and opposing the mughal muslim ruler ,so still you think that calling them munafik is non Islamic?
No Muslim can revolt against a Muslim ruler except some special cause that I have already said.
And those companion of shivaji not only revolted but revolted for a terrorist name shivaji.
Do you still not think that they are munafik?