Bangladesh Media Watch

[scholseys]

All socialists are not Bad. The world is mourning the death of Hugo Chavez! :-(

Another commie, you should see the situation in Venezuela, its much worse than awami league. If you think our media is censored, you should see theirs. He is adored because of his anti-american rhetoric. His oil industries are lacking far behind, with not much growth either. He nationalized everything like our Mujib which led to collapse of most industries. The only way venezuela is running by oil.

 

[PlanetSoldier]

you must have your indian visa ready to leave the country if awami league does not return.

BAL member doesn't need visa, they simply cross the border without it but surely they have to pass night in servant quarter there .

 

[Mattrixx]

All socialists are not Bad. The world is mourning the death of Hugo Chavez! :-(

I always like socialist like chavez, castro, che. But our politicians couldnt take their good.

 

[Luffy 500]

BD medias are best in the world.
Apart from amardesh,shongram,noyadiganta, diganta and some other all medias always give us actual and unbiased news.
This is good that this newspapers working for pro independent power.
We get news very easily and on time by the electronic media.
But medias like aljazeera shouldn't poke very much on politics.
They are welcome to show our economic growth and future possibilities.

Typical hammarian "mainstream bangladeshi".

Btw madx & his 95.6 % "mainstream bangladeshis" couldn't make it to this thread:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...st-caught-while-vandalizing-shahid-minar.html

Their Indian dadas had to helplessly troll ignorantly.

 

[scholseys]

Ronald Raegan, now that is a leader.

 

[Zabaniyah]

All socialists are not Bad. The world is mourning the death of Hugo Chavez! :-(

That guy's socialist policies made Venezuela's vast oil output fall year by year with inflation rate kicking at over 30%! That's right 30%!!

 

[PlanetSoldier]

No I mean never, as u confessed urself a (r*****) I have fear of my own life. I dont want to die as razib. So hiding identity is a best option.
And I can see in u a strong imagination of chapati. Every time u say me chapati. By telling that isnt it hurt in ur chapa.
Shows that u have strong fear of chapati which bothers u from sleep.
Good that chapatis are in control now watch the shows of machetes by jamat.
If they dont stop than chapati will come.
Until that wait my friend

I myself confessed to reduce your typing labor in next post , at least you have to be honored as a member of Elite Chapati League.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Ronald Raegan, now that is a leader.

No one beats Clinton

 

[kobiraaz]

Another commie, you should see the situation in Venezuela, its much worse than awami league. If you think our media is censored, you should see theirs. He is adored because of his anti-american rhetoric. His oil industries are lacking far behind, with not much growth either. He nationalized everything like our Mujib which led to collapse of most industries. The only way venezuela is running by oil.

He called American president a devil inside United nations General Assembly. How awesome is that? Yes Venezuela is poor because he was feeding whole latin America..... I agree with your freedom of media part though!

 

[Mattrixx]

Typical hammarian "mainstream bangladeshi".

Btw madx & his 95.6 % "mainstream bangladeshis" couldn't make it to this thread:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...st-caught-while-vandalizing-shahid-minar.html

I cant say anything without source.
The man be was a victim of jamat propaganda.
In a place where majorities are bnp and jamat those folks are always victim.
Jamat always trying to rotate the situation.
Today they attacked on police and when police attacked in response that gone on bnp.
So bnp and jamat given strike again.
In both cases beneficiary is jamat.

 

[kalu_miah]

Guys, not all socialism is bad. Godless atheist communism and socialism is bad and so is totalitarian govt. of any type, whether they are socialist or capitalist.

What is important is more democracy. Some of the best govt. model is Scandinavian "Nodic Model":
Nordic model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Nordic model (or Nordic capitalism[1]), formerly known as The Swedish Model refers to the economic and social models of the Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Finland). Although there are significant differences among the Nordic countries, they all share some common traits. These include support for a "universalist" welfare state (relative to other developed countries) which are aimed specifically at enhancing individual autonomy and ensuring the universal provision of basic human rights, as well as for stabilising the economy. The Nordic model is distinguished from other types of welfare states by its emphasis on maximising labour force participation, promoting gender equality, egalitarian and extensive benefit levels, the large magnitude of wealth redistribution, and liberal use of expansionary fiscal policy.[2]

Once there is democracy, people can try different forms of govt. to see what best fits their country situation. I support the people's trial and error to find what works best.

Reagan was a corporate stooge and an idiot. He started the downhill trend in the US.

The best system will maximize the development of mind and body of the inhabitants in the shortest possible time. Concentration of wealth in too few hands and having a large number of poor people who are malnourished and not educated is a recipe for doom for any nation.

 

[scholseys]

He called American president a devil inside United nations General Assembly. How awesome is that? Yes Venezuela is poor because he was feeding whole latine America..... I agree with your freedom of media part though!

Bush bashing.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Guys, not all socialism is bad. Godless atheist communism and socialism is bad and so is totalitarian govt. of any type, whether they are socialist or capitalist.

What is important is more democracy. Some of the best govt. model is Scandinavian "Nodic Model":
Nordic model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Once there is democracy, people can try different forms of govt. to see what best fits their country situation. I support the people's trial and error to find what works best.

Reagan was a corporate stooge and an idiot. He started the downhill trend in the US.

The best system will maximize the development of mind and body of the inhabitants in the shortest possible time. Concentration of wealth in too few hands and having a large number of poor people who are malnourished and not educated is a recipe for doom for any nation.

Key differences between Socialism and Communism:

Socialism: Encourages collectivism, and state-ownership of firms through democratic means.

Communism: Encourages collectivism and state-ownership of firms through totalitarian means. Typically initiated through violent revolution.

Anyhow, both concepts are failed ones in South Asia. Proven by both Nehru and Mujib. It just won't work in this culture.

Though, one important achievement Nehru had was in education and importance to English-language education which contributed greatly to India's IT sector today. Mujib on the other hand didn't get that one either.

 

[kalu_miah]

Key differences between Socialism and Communism:

Socialism: Encourages collectivism, and state-ownership of firms through democratic means.

Communism: Encourages collectivism and state-ownership of firms through totalitarian means. Typically initiated through violent revolution.

Anyhow, both concepts are failed ones in South Asia. Proven by both Nehru and Mujib. It just won't work in this culture.

Though, one important achievement Nehru had was in education and importance to English-language education which contributed greatly to India's IT sector today. Mujib on the other hand didn't get that one either.

The ism's are for people to choose democratically through trial and error and see what works best for them, which could be a mix of many different ism's.

As for failure of socialism in South Asia, both Nehru and Mujib and their respective parties are closer to dynastic oligarchies bent on totalitarian state rule, using democracy as a facade to legitimize this oligarchy rife with nepotism and corruption. It was neither totalitarian communism nor true democratic socialism like in Nordic countries, the result was a failure. Democracy is not well suited for uninformed and uneducated masses, it is more suitable for informed and well educated populace.

That is why my personal emphasis is more on collective self rule and a move towards direct democracy, first for the internet enabled population and then bringing the whole population in this group gradually, as we educate more people and make them internet enabled.

But just because democracy is not suited for poor countries, we cannot go back to Army rule, as suggested by flame retard in another thread.

A social system will function best if we can maximize productive potentials of a maximum number of people and actually find ways to use their creativity and productivity, for example in export oriented industries that can utilize the skilled man power.

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Key differences between Socialism and Communism:

Socialism: Encourages collectivism, and state-ownership of firms through democratic means.

Communism: Encourages collectivism and state-ownership of firms through totalitarian means. Typically initiated through violent revolution.

Anyhow, both concepts are failed ones in South Asia. Proven by both Nehru and Mujib. It just won't work in this culture.

Though, one important achievement Nehru had was in education and importance to English-language education which contributed greatly to India's IT sector today. Mujib on the other hand didn't get that one either.

bulls eye

& we are seeing the benefit of that both from an communication,( soft power) & ease in entrepreneurism (English as a means of interaction with the worlds leading commercial communities) which has taken India to where it is, unfortunately both Pakistan & Bangladesh has failed to capitalized on this by giving unrealistic importance to both Urdu & Bangla in the state educational curriculum, leaving the masses the only choice to choose between private schools ( which only the chosen few can access) or the govt funded education system which on the other hand can only help produce some skillful labors but @ the same times fails to create a skillful blue/white collar office work force thus stagnating the growth process for general entrepreneurism from the middle income populace of the social spectrum, which is so essential in todays global business order, another outcome of this is the growing distance between the "English speaking class" & the "general populace @ large" it seems like God has bestowed on both Pakistan & Bangladesh the dumbest of leaders those whose "short term" visions" has no ends but @ the same time their "longterm" vision" has no start to begin with