What's new

Bangladesh massively depends on India

Status
Not open for further replies.
All multi-ethnic states in history have failed and India shall be no different.
bahut sari chije History me pehli baar hoti hai..that's the specialty of history...and if India will fail..Bangladesh will be the 1st nation to feel the heat...
so, better pray it doesn't happen..:coffee:
 
. . . . .
What is a "dalal"?

effectively a traitor..... one who would put the interest of another country over their own..... pan-bian i believe in mandarin

in terms of BD forum you have a core group of false flagging indian hindutva goons who promotes india
 
.
effectively a traitor..... one who would put the interest of another country over their own..... pan-bian i believe in mandarin

in terms of BD forum you have a core group of false flagging indian hindutva goons who promotes india

Ah I see. Thanks for the explanation. :cheers:
 
.
Only time will tell but looking from the current perspective we are continuing to improve in all fronts rather than heading backwards and poverty rate has been halved from 60% in 1980 to 30% in 2010 which in simple numbers sense means pulling hundreds of millions out of poverty you call that failing???


You don't get it. India is only staying together because it is so poor and the masses are illiterate and know no better. As people in India slowly start getting more literate they will start to question the anomaly that is India in the world.

In the subcontinent, the old Pakistan split as the power struggle between the Bengalis and the Punjabis could not be reconciled, .Now the dominant Punjabis hold Pakistan together as they are as numerous as all the other ethnicities put together. India has no dominant ethnic group that can hold the country together.

India is destined to split into many dozens of states in the end.
 
.
It shows what is going to happen to Pakistan as soon as Pakistan phases out the negative list and declares India as MFN/NDMA.

lol...this is stupid & wishful thinking. There are multiple factors that has made Bangladesh dependent on India, which is not the case wrt Pakistan.
 
.
Why this love is atyachar for you? Even you can't develop without India.

Islamabad looks to India to aid economy

Islamabad looks to India to aid economy - FT.com
dude don't compare my country with your Bangladesh, Pakistan is 8 lakhs 75 thousand sq km's that's more then six times the size of your Bangladesh !, it has borders with China & Afghanistan in the central Asian horizon to border with India in south Asia to border with Iran plus a maritime boundary with Oman in the mid-east ! it's a nuclear power with over 110 warheads & has the fastest growing nuclear arsenals in the world it has an army of more then 624,000 active + 515,000 reserves an air force of 400 combat fighter jets, a navy with frigates, submarines, ambitious assault ships, FAC's etc's & one of the few country's in world to have the prestigious fourth command strategic force command generally a country have only 3 army, air force & navy its economy is more then 220,billion its population is 20 cr ! Pakistan is not dependent on India after all Pakistan is not Bangladesh ! in fact if Bangladesh is dependent on india then it is because it wants to be dependent on India, it doesn't means it has to be that way no off course not look at south Korea its smaller then Bangladesh surrounded by China & japan but it is still stand strong in front of giants like China & Japan anyways Bangladesh is your country so do what ever you want with it, but please don't bring Pakistan in your weird fantasies
geographically, militarily & economically Pakistan is in a different league ! :pakistan:
 
Last edited:
.
dude don't compare my country with your Bangladesh, Pakistan is 8 lakhs 75 thousand sq km's that's more then six times the size of your Bangladesh !, it has borders with China & Afghanistan in the central Asian horizon to border with India in south Asia to border with Iran plus a maritime boundary with Oman in the mid-east ! it's a nuclear power with over 110 warheads & has the fastest growing nuclear arsenals in the world it has an army of more then 624,000 active + 515,000 reserves an air force of 400 combat fighter jets, a navy with frigates, submarines, ambitious assault ships, FAC's etc's & one of the few country's in world to have the prestigious fourth command strategic force command generally a country have only 3 army, air force & navy its economy is more then 220,billion its population is 20 cr ! Pakistan is not dependent on India after all Pakistan is not Bangladesh ! in fact if Bangladesh is dependent on india then it is because it wants to be dependent on India it doesn't means it has to be that that way not off course not look at south Korea its smaller then Bangladesh surrounded by China & japan but it still stand strong in front of giants like China & Japan anyways Bangladesh is your country so do what ever you want with it, but please don't bring Pakistan in your weird fantasies
geographically, militarily & economically Pakistan is in a different league ! :pakistan:

Not really, even after having the military might and nuclear weapon, there is far more violence in Pakistan than compared to Bangladesh. There are foreign nation violating your air space and killing your people, so military power means crap in this situation. And please don't use South Korea as an example, South Korea got massive help from the US whether it be militarily or economically. And as for sharing borders, even having all the borders, Pakistan fails to use them properly case and point being the condition of the economy. And Pakistan is also heavily dependent of loan and aid form the World Bank and from China for its building projects. So no you are pretty much in the same league.
 
.
Not really, even after having the military might and nuclear weapon, there is far more violence in Pakistan than compared to Bangladesh. There are foreign nation violating your air space and killing your people, so military power means crap in this situation. And please don't use South Korea as an example, South Korea got massive help from the US whether it be militarily or economically. And as for sharing borders, even having all the borders, Pakistan fails to use them properly case and point being the condition of the economy. And Pakistan is also heavily dependent of loan and aid form the World Bank and from China for its building projects. So no you are pretty much in the same league.
no sir its not
example U.S the sole super power is violating Pakistan's sovereignty
while India whose economy @ $1.9 trillion is less then Italy's $2 trillion dollar one & its military is dependent of Russia, France ,U.S, Israel is violating Bangladesh's sovereignty

if U.S/Nato would do that to Bangladesh it would have practically cease to exist ! Pakistan even after 12 years of extensive U.S/Nato pressure is standing there
That's the deference
 
Last edited:
.
no sir its not
example U.S the sole super power is violating Pakistan's sovereignty
while India whose economy @ $1.9 trillion is less then Italy's $2 trillion dollar one & military is dependent of Russia, France ,U.S, Israel is violating Bangladesh's sovereignty

if U.S/Nato would do that to Bangladesh it would have practically cease to exist ! Pakistan even after 12 years of extensive U.S pressure is standing there
That's the deference

Yes, yet they dare not touch Iran which has no nuclear weapons, their military equipment is also not as capable as yours so, the argument of being that they can do it because they are super power, doesn't really work.
 
.
You don't get it. India is only staying together because it is so poor and the masses are illiterate and know no better. As people in India slowly start getting more literate they will start to question the anomaly that is India in the world.

In the subcontinent, the old Pakistan split as the power struggle between the Bengalis and the Punjabis could not be reconciled, .Now the dominant Punjabis hold Pakistan together as they are as numerous as all the other ethnicities put together. India has no dominant ethnic group that can hold the country together.

India is destined to split into many dozens of states in the end.

I didn't know you are still reading same stories from your text books. This is what exactly Pakistan thought, J&K people can't adjust in Hindustan and they will join them back even after few years if not immediately. Now after 6 decades, there are not even 2% Kashmirs wants to join them and they are happy to stay back in India(exclude few thousand separatists).

Take your home country, even after few decades, daily dozens are crossing the border in to India, hoping for better life & society. First try to keep together your own one ethnic community who is killing each other daily, then preach others. Now, come with different story which is not at all related to my response.

When some1 don't have stamina to compete, all he can hope his neighbor also fails the same way.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes, yet they dare not touch Iran which has no nuclear weapons, their military equipment is also not as capable as yours so, the argument of being that they can do it because they are super power, doesn't really work.
no comparison, dude Iran has been sanctioned to its teeth it talked big but had to give in to pressure for example, it has agreed to many of the conditions of the IAEA, while Pakistan on the other hand had 20-25 nukes back in 2001 & today it has more then 110 ! in spite of the U.S/Nato pressure see that's the difference ! ,back in 2001 when every one was counting on Pakistan nukes getting disarmed & it getting bombed to stone age not only did it survived that situation but @ the same time it has successfully handled the 2002 eye ball to eye ball stand off with India, & in spite off all this, today its an important player in the end game in Afghanistan
see that's the difference
 
Last edited:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom