A friendly govt or not, the country called Bangladesh is despised by India. Check the geography, BD is a pain in India's a**. Its existence with a strong military gives India a security panic for NE even in peacetime. A militarily weak BD is what India wants.EastWatch: WTF ..... on one hand you guys call GoB as a indian stooge.. and here you accuse us of instigating this carnage and eliminating this very stooge government (without shedding any proof of our involvement). Take your stand. Either we support a pro indian government (in which case dont blame us for this carnage) or we instigate this carnage (in which case i would like forward to some proof)
The Army and IAF was put on alert (as should be for such situation) AFTER this incident. Google it.
If you want to debate, be ready with your facts. Else give your posts the disclaimer of "My Opinion/Theory"
Im fed up of BD members ridiculous theories (without any supporting data). You guys dont own any of your misfortune ... everyone else is responsible for your problems.. how easy.
A friendly govt in Dhaka cannot help India when there are political or armed struggles in the NE, because some elements in the BD army may support those struggles. Moreover, an opportunity does not come by design, it comes suddenly. So, Indian secret agents had to act on that lone opportunity even when a friendly govt has been elected to power. A similar opportunity may not arrive in the next hundred years.
If there is a war with China in Arunachal, India will lose that war unless BD opens a land and a sky corridor for easy transportation of its logistics. No strong army in BD will ever allow it. So, I have a feeling that MOSSAD and RAW, after knowing the BDR grievances, had masterminded the mutiny with the help of their agents in BD. The purpose was to initiate a civil war that would destroy the BD army and the country would be in ruin forever.
If this is true, then India had certainly alerted its army and airforce even before the carnage was initiated. However, MOSSAD/RAW's final wish of a civil war was not to be materialized, only because Gen. MUA was not quite a hawkish like Gen. Yahya Khan. Now, however, he is painted a traitor by some of his country's educated class, only because of the decision that saved the country.
It is a military forum, where there are discussions or debates on many affairs of a country. I do not have anything against India. However, whenever I feel my country's security is at a risk due to certain covert action by some foreign powers, I must then come out to criticize that action. Hope, you will understand my position.
Last edited: