Straight
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 296
- Reaction score
- 0
A senior diplomat told Outlook that New Delhi advised Hasina and the Bangladesh army to tread cautiously and avoid creating a 1975-like situation, when most members of the country’s founder Mujibur Rahman’s family were gunned down. That was perhaps the reason why Hasina announced general amnesty to secure the surrender of BDR mutineers.
(creating safe passage for Indian commando assets who committed massacre)
What’s your problem, Stumper ? Try to understand what idune is trying to tell you and all, and what many had understood already except you. You seem to be busy with comparing petals than looking at the rose.
The quote shows that
1. Even Indian media knows that SH’s amnesty was stemmed from New Delhi’s advice. Note here her ‘loyalty-to-India’. But, did she understand also what Amnesty---as advised by India---does entail ?
2. Oh! yes. Loyal SH easily understood that Amnesty has to be coupled with Safe Passage so as to benefit both local & foreign gang
Now without looking at the intended import of the quote or trying to understand what plainly is being said, you seem to start another round of flimsy and diversionary exchange on respective meaning of Amnesty and Safe Package’ ? Sometimes you seem to start a debate on corroborative evidence and circumstantial evidence, and thus nearly veer all of us away from the main thread of discussion.
You can not play football and cricket and hockey in the same field at the same time. Can you ?
Now, again coming to your original question : [If SH mishandled the BDR mutiny] How does all this make my country a suspect?
Answer : You find the mark of a tiger’s paw, you can trust---not only suspect--that a tiger came on the spot. This is a elementary example of circumstantial evidence, and enough to conclude.
If you find the paw of SH/BAL anywhere, and any mischief happened there against interest of Bangladesh, India was there, too----we saw this pattern last 35 years with bleeding heart and weeping eyes.
That is why we worry about your country’s attitude. Honestly, have you understood us, Stumper ?
Stumper, do you realize how provocative and rude your language had been over ours’ ? A big difference lies there. However, any improvement is welcome.