What's new

Bangladesh ‘feared naval attack’ from Burma

Do you think that we can't read? What about alligation of helping burma against you ? If we helping than they are our neighbour and we can do whatever we want. Who the hell are you?

Still go back to the point, which bd member want war with india? No bd member stopped you from taking sides.

---------- Post added at 07:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:06 PM ----------

who gave you that light weapons to you? USA or china

Who took the heavy weaponary left by pakistan??

Who gave blood and fought for bd??
 
.
Ans of your first post
leonblack08 11:10 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by MBI Munshi:
Myanmar gave a nice excuse for
modernizing the navy. They should
provoke us again so we can also build up
our air defense. I hope that we never go
have to go to war with Myanmar as India
and US will take advantage of the
situation and the biggest loser will be
Bangladesh. All these military investments
should be for facing India as a
deterrent .......
Completely agree with you. I have been
saying this all along through the naval
stand-off. Their nuisance have resulted in
waking up BD policymakers. We do see
increased level of procurement and even
new forward air bases such as the one in
Cox-Bazar, which recently became
operational.
We do need some more of their irritation,
it will wake the idiots in the Govt. big time.
All these procurement would only
strengthen our armed forces and act as
deterrent to any foreign threat.

For second one

Did you understood what i written? If pakistani didn't left than how can you take their left weapons and what about kilo fights, amx tanks, sheltering your scared people or where comes the training for mukti bahani, operatoin jackpot etc etc.


MBI mentioned deterrence. Is deterrence equals to war??? Leon was talking about burma, we had a standoff with them.

Do you understand what i have written before?? Who fought and neared victory in those nine months?? giving weapons is not fighting war
 
.
who gave blood for BD?????

We lost 3000 brave men for you, 1000 injured, lost valuable currency in helping and fighting just for you and the permanent one( most important ), I and my people of NE suffering from your people who don't want to go beck. And now please, don't insult our martyr by saying that we did for out interest

You mean Bengali Muslim in NE? Well, muslim land which were annexed in 1947 by India through treachery would had returned to Pakistan by now if there were no war in 1971. So you are the most benifactor of that war.
 
.
who gave blood for BD?????

We lost 3000 brave men for you, 1000 injured, lost valuable currency in helping and fighting just for you and the permanent one( most important ), I and my people of NE suffering from your people who don't want to go beck.

And now please, don't insult our martyr by saying that we did for out interest

Nobody is marginalising their sacrifice. But you are marginalising the scarifice by our muktijodhhas and downplaying their significance and increasing indian role in helping bd by saying this

"Lol. You didn't able to beat pakistani in 9 months and suffered 3 million deaths and two hundred thousand rapes. We made them surrender before fortnight"
 
.
again read this

I hope that we never go
have to go to war with Myanmar as India
and US will take advantage of the
situation and the biggest loser will be
Bangladesh. All these military investments
should be for facing India as a
deterrent .

Why india? Did we done something wrong with you? India will benefits if you wins more than burma wins.



Giving weapons is not winning wars?????

Than tell me, can you win wars without weapons and training? And better to give any example in history in which a army won war without weapons and traning no matters how much outnubered

India borders us from three sides. If someone attacks us it will be most probably be you, even if the chances are quite low. For example, even though usa and canada are best buds, canada still maitains a strong military, even though it only borders usa.

I said giving weapons is not equals to fighting a war. China provided weapons for libiya during protest, it does not mean they fought the protesters on behalf of gaddafi
 
. .
You said "Who fought and neared victory in those nine months?? giving weapons is not fighting war?

Without weapons or man power you can't win a war. We deserved 50% of cradit but you said that " giving weapons is not fighting" which is not even 1 %

---------- Post added at 05:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:18 PM ----------




So. Which incident you talking?


Yes i stand by my statement, giving weapons is not fighting war. Americans gave afghans weapons against the soviets, that doe not mean that they fought the soviets.

I am talking about 2001 border clashes
 
.
LOL you didnt beat them in 1947 or 1965, but suddenly you beat them in a fortnight.

In those 9 months our muktijoddas were fighting with light weapons against the heavy weapons of pakistan. We were winning but you guys had to barge in.

Hello ,
I Dont Agree with You , If it wasnt India , Pakistan would have Still holded Bangladesh Under Opression

Initially During 1971 war , The Support of Indian army was Limited with Artillery Support to Mukti Bahini Units , Traning of Units and Providing them with Arms
and Then Indian army,Air force was Order for Border Strikes for Preparation of Final Liberation

In the Final Stages of War , When Indian army was Actively Involved - Our Army was Leading the Strikes on Pakistani units while the Bahinis were Providing second Tier Fire Support

It feels sad when a Bangaldeshi Internet Warrior Neglects the Role of Indian army in 1971 war

No one should Forget that Indian army Gave Immense Sacrifice to Liberate Bangladesh and The war Against Pakistan was Not a Victory of Indian armed forces But a Joint Victory of India and People of Bangladesh
 
.
Hello ,
I Dont Agree with You , If it wasnt India , Pakistan would have Still holded Bangladesh Under Opression

Initially During 1971 war , The Support of Indian army was Limited with Artillery Support to Mukti Bahini Units , Traning of Units and Providing them with Arms
and Then Indian army,Air force was Order for Border Strikes for Preparation of Final Liberation

In the Final Stages of War , When Indian army was Actively Involved - Our Army was Leading the Strikes on Pakistani units while the Bahinis were Providing second Tier Fire Support

It feels sad when a Bangaldeshi Internet Warrior Neglects the Role of Indian army in 1971 war

No one should Forget that Indian army Gave Immense Sacrifice to Liberate Bangladesh and The war Against Pakistan was Not a Victory of Indian armed forces But a Joint Victory of India and People of Bangladesh

Yeah bd people will give india credit for saying things like this

"Lol. You didn't able to beat pakistani in 9 months and suffered 3 million deaths and two hundred thousand rapes. We made them surrender before fortnight" by pradator

We do give credit to indian soldiers but arent you guys overhyping yourselves sometimes
 
.
Hello ,
I Dont Agree with You , If it wasnt India , Pakistan would have Still holded Bangladesh Under Opression

Initially During 1971 war , The Support of Indian army was Limited with Artillery Support to Mukti Bahini Units , Traning of Units and Providing them with Arms
and Then Indian army,Air force was Order for Border Strikes for Preparation of Final Liberation

In the Final Stages of War , When Indian army was Actively Involved - Our Army was Leading the Strikes on Pakistani units while the Bahinis were Providing second Tier Fire Support

It feels sad when a Bangaldeshi Internet Warrior Neglects the Role of Indian army in 1971 war

No one should Forget that Indian army Gave Immense Sacrifice to Liberate Bangladesh and The war Against Pakistan was Not a Victory of Indian armed forces But a Joint Victory of India and People of Bangladesh

A Long Way to Freedom

The people of Bangladesh discovered their identity through the Language Movement in 1952. The struggle to establish their identity and national spirit began soon after 1947 when they realized that under Pakistan created on the two nation theory they was little scope for the distance culture of Banglees to flourish . The refusal of the central government to grant status to Bangla language became the focal point of struggle, because language was the most important vehicle of the cultural expression of the people of this land.

The contradiction of the two Pakistans , the racial oppression and the exploitation of the West over the East was gradually unveiled. The struggle for the consciousness of identity and cultural freedom which began with the advent of the student movements of the 60's gained momentum in the mass movement of 1969. Though it brought about the fall of a mighty military ruler like Ayub Khan, the ultimate goal was not achieved. After this, came the election of 1970 with absolute victory of Sheikh Mujibur Rahaman.

In the elections of December 7, 1970 the Awami League won 160 out of 162 seats in East Pakistan, all but two, and would have had a clear majority in the new assembly had it been convened. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman became the majority party leader of the Pakistan National Assembly .

The military rules of Pakistan refused to allow the Awami League to form a government. Major General Ziaur Rahman on behalf of Mujib declared independence. A full scale movement of non-cooperation with the military government began on the 26th of March, 1971 which is celebrated as the Independence Day every year. Thus Bangladesh plunged into a civil war.

The Pakistan Army began their genocide by attacking the innocent Bangalees of Dhaka city. The dwellers of Dhaka city never confronted such intolerable days. The Pakistani army massacred 35,000 Bengali intellectuals and unleashed a brutal war against the Bangalees of East Pakistan to prevent their secession. But no one let the dream encircled flag fall down to dust .

During the nine month struggle which ensued an estimated three million Bengalis died and and ten million refuges fled into India Sheikh Mujib was imprisoned in west Pakistan. A Bangladesh Government in exile was established. The actual military campaign took place in December and lasted only ten days. The Indian Army launched a massive offensive against the Pakistani forces to support the Bangladesh movement . On December 16, 1971, the Pakistan army surrendered.

1971- Independence War of Bangladesh
 
.
I too stand on my statement

Giving weapons is not winning wars?????
Than tell me, can you win wars without
weapons and training? And better to give
any example in history in which a army
won war without weapons and traning
no matters how much outnubered

You weakend them but final and main battle fought by us and they surrendered to us


2001 border clash????

We are not so small hearted or short tempered to start mass invasion for such small incident,proof, please read about kargil war and We gave you more land than we received in our PM's last visit because your people migrated their and sattled

I said that giving weapons is not FIGHTING THE WAR. Where did you come up with the winning the war thing. The main battle was fought by us, you just came in and swept up what was remaining

I was refering to terabaaps comment of what will happen if bangladesh took a shot at india. Nothing happened. The territories exchanged were enclaves. We do not need to migrate there cos technically the enclaves is in bangladesh
 
.
Hello ,
I Dont Agree with You , If it wasnt India , Pakistan would have Still holded Bangladesh Under Opression

Initially During 1971 war , The Support of Indian army was Limited with Artillery Support to Mukti Bahini Units , Traning of Units and Providing them with Arms
and Then Indian army,Air force was Order for Border Strikes for Preparation of Final Liberation

In the Final Stages of War , When Indian army was Actively Involved - Our Army was Leading the Strikes on Pakistani units while the Bahinis were Providing second Tier Fire Support

It feels sad when a Bangaldeshi Internet Warrior Neglects the Role of Indian army in 1971 war

No one should Forget that Indian army Gave Immense Sacrifice to Liberate Bangladesh and The war Against Pakistan was Not a Victory of Indian armed forces But a Joint Victory of India and People of Bangladesh

lol, Internet warrior? Oh look who's talking :lol:

Do you even read what is discussed on this forum?

India's intention was simply to smash Pakistan into two. The desires of ethnic Bengalis were a different matter, and in many cases inevitable. They simply complemented one another. But goals and vision were different.
 
.
Hello ,
I Dont Agree with You , If it wasnt India , Pakistan would have Still holded Bangladesh Under Opression

In the Final Stages of War , When Indian army was Actively Involved - Our Army was Leading the Strikes on Pakistani units while the Bahinis were Providing second Tier Fire SupportIt feels sad when a Bangaldeshi Internet Warrior Neglects the Role of Indian army in 1971 war

Where have you got this information from - the underlined part ?

Fire support from the Bahini ? ..in tiers ?
 
.
Where have you got this information from - the underlined part ?

Fire support from the Bahini ? ..in tiers ?

I think he missed the fact that the Mukiti Bahini was a rag-tag guerrilla force :lol:
 
.
why India's have conflict with every country those who have border with them? :confused:
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom