Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 26,569
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
How?
Let me explain this by way of just the apparel industry.
Ten years ago we used to make basic items like t-shirts and underwear where labor quantity and quality (and the skills required) was at a very low level.
Now (I recently posted a video about this), the quality (precision) and quantity of value-addition-labor has gone up with manufacture of complicated higher price-tag items like branded Suits, jackets, medium-priced ladies' couture etc. To make these higher priced items and the many complicated critical operations involved, you need an entirely different type of precision skill set compared to sewing underwear.
At the same time, local backward integration (such as manufacture of specialized high-priced higher thread count shirting, denim and precision fabric locally) has increased many fold. Alongside this, specialized technical fabric manufacture for jackets and outerwear (production of which is increasing in volume every year) has also started locally. All this has lowered the cost of input and the time-to-market just-in-time factors substantially for local production, and made sourcing from Bangladesh much more attractive than in prior times. Which in turn increased the value-addition argument for Bangladesh many fold.
My point was that lower priced garment manufacture (t-shirts and underwear) is going to be transferred to places like Ethiopia, Somalia, Cambodia pretty soon. Indonesia passed this stage at least ten years ago if not earlier. To stay competitive, Bangladesh had to add qualitative value addition factors like this and move higher up the value-addition chain for more money. But in the end, labor cost and scale/organization of efficient production is always the biggest factor in being competitive as a sourcing destination. This is why Bangladesh could pull it off and our neighbors couldn't.
Last edited: