What's new

Bangladesh cannot help Rohingya - Prime Minister of Bangladesh

.
they are burmese nationals and burma should stop killing them.
Why should theh migrate to another country
 
.
she was expected to say that , gone r the days of Muslim brotherhood or pain for fellow muslims ..............
 
.
Why should we allow them to enter our country!! Lady not even on humanitarian grounds?

When you are not allowing helpless people to enter your territory for shelter then how come you expect Indians to welcome illegal Bangladeshi entering their land! Heights of hypocrisy, absolutely a shameless PM I have ever seen.
 
.
they are burmese nationals and burma should stop killing them.
Why should theh migrate to another country
They are refugees not immigrants.Even Turkey allowed Syrian Refugees inside its borders.(No body in his right mind would migrate to Bangladesh for economic benefit).
 
.
she was expected to say that , gone r the days of Muslim brotherhood or pain for fellow muslims ..............
No such thing ever existed, you being Pakistani should first worry about your own country first then everything else next. Without a country you won't last 2 blocks with your Muslim brotherhood slogan. Also countries where Muslim brotherhood should be worried about too are enjoying there rich lives, then who are you to pass such statements. It's your country first and the rest is next. That's the only way to save your integrity and sovereignty in this new cruel world order. Without your country you don't have a voice, religions don't feed your family anymore like they used to. It's nation which can stand for something in world arena if your pillars are stable enough.
 
.
They are refugees not immigrants.Even Turkey allowed Syrian Refugees inside its borders.(No body in his right mind would migrate to Bangladesh for economic benefit).

Bangladesh think that they will never return back if once allowed to enter Bangladesh putting strain on resources. Bangladesh too absorbed Biharis in their society when you disowned them.
 
.
Popular sentiment is one thing and right thing is another one .i think she did the right thing for her country but sadly humanity suffered .
 
.
See, now since she is not white this is not considered "racism". But had a White person denied non-white refugees from entering his/her nation then they would be labeled "racist".

I hate it how everyone expects White people to help non-whites in order to prove that they are "tolerant", "accepting", and not "racist".

Yet tell me how many so called "Muslim" countries would have accepted these Rohingya refugees?

Are Arab government making any noise over this the way they are over Syria?
 
.
See, now since she is not white this is not considered "racism". But had a White person denied non-white refugees from entering his/her nation then they would be labeled "racist".

I hate it how everyone expects White people to help non-whites in order to prove that they are "tolerant", "accepting", and not "racist".

Yet tell me how many so called "Muslim" countries would have accepted these Rohingya refugees?

Are Arab government making any noise over this the way they are over Syria?
I completely agree with you - Western Nations are far better then these "Islamic Countries". You know just few months ago a thread was opened about Israelis refusing to accept African Refugees..hypocrisy..

No such thing ever existed, you being Pakistani should first worry about your own country first then everything else next. Without a country you won't last 2 blocks with your Muslim brotherhood slogan. Also countries where Muslim brotherhood should be worried about too are enjoying there rich lives, then who are you to pass such statements. It's your country first and the rest is next. That's the only way to save your integrity and sovereignty in this new cruel world order. Without your country you don't have a voice, religions don't feed your family anymore like they used to. It's nation which can stand for something in world arena if your pillars are stable enough.
I agree - It has nothing to do with religion.More to do with humanity.
 
.
PM says Bangladesh cannot help Rohingya - YouTube

Reporter really grilled her.She doesn't have a heart.She even said that Rohingyas are treated fairly in Myanmar.

All garbage she delivers everyday in her speeches here in BD are not chained enough and clearly represent her as a psycho. This is just such a statement. Forgive her...it's good to see she can face an interview of Al-Jazeera, that's more than enough ;) .
 
.
Bangladesh think that they will never return back if once allowed to enter Bangladesh putting strain on resources. Bangladesh too absorbed Biharis in their society when you disowned them.
It's Bangladesh not UK or USA and Myanmar is not far behind Bangladesh in terms of Economical Development so why wouldn't they return to Mynmar if conditions are good..In any case - there are ways to control the flow of refugees but to turn back the refugees who would ultimately be killed or prosecuted is just evil.
 
.
1st of all already there are around 5,00,000 Rohingyas are living in Bangladesh. It is not like that Bangladesh is not helping them. On top of it couple of 100Ks Rohingya went to middle eastern countries using or some how managing Bangladeshi passport and responsible for most of the crime for which Bangladeshis are being accused.

It is not like that Bangladesh would not help them but what the president of Myanmar said at the UN is just enough to not let any more Rohingyas. The president said that he wants to send all the rohingyas to refugee camp or to any other 3rd country. What does it mean. It means that if Bangladesh accept any more of these Rohingya Bangladesh will help the genocide against Rohinst which is happening by the burmese janta and they will not take back any of them. It is already decades despite after promise Myanmar government have not taken back any Rohingyas.

Under this circumstances any country would take these decisions.

But PM Hasina should not have said that they are treated fairly at Myanmar.
 
.
See, now since she is not white this is not considered "racism". But had a White person denied non-white refugees from entering his/her nation then they would be labeled "racist".

I hate it how everyone expects White people to help non-whites in order to prove that they are "tolerant", "accepting", and not "racist".

Yet tell me how many so called "Muslim" countries would have accepted these Rohingya refugees?

Are Arab government making any noise over this the way they are over Syria?

You better not compare the Western world with the rest of the world. The West transcended into a whole new level of civilization quite a while ago.
 
.
See, now since she is not white this is not considered "racism". But had a White person denied non-white refugees from entering his/her nation then they would be labeled "racist".

I hate it how everyone expects White people to help non-whites in order to prove that they are "tolerant", "accepting", and not "racist".

Yet tell me how many so called "Muslim" countries would have accepted these Rohingya refugees?

Are Arab government making any noise over this the way they are over Syria?

Rohingya people got equal treatment only from Canada not from any Muslim nation. Even they are not allowed in general schools of Malaysia, they have to get admission to different schools there.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom