Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Sorry excuse me ? NO Geography was not my major, that was minor. BTW.
1 ans is here-
2-So what is the dame playing to save Bihar? Bangladesh is floating?
3- So what ? So why do you try to save Assam by water contract with China?
4-Hmm. That water is in violation of international law and into Bangladesh. Why?
5-So, by taking Farakka open by saving Assam, Bangladesh's plan to douse the plans of the Government of India as a pilot project?
The post is okay. Someone might want to give a counter. I can give 101 rreasons. But the shortage of time
Also perhaps a shortage of brains. Farakka still has nothing to do with Assam. Look at your own map. And then look at the painfully detailed explanation for the simple-minded that I posted.
As for your fatuous questions:
- The answer is indeed in the map shown, and it makes confetti of your original remark.
- Whether 'the dame' was trying to save Bihar or not, it had nothing to do with Assam.
- So it has nothing to do with Assam. And why should not India try to save Assam through a contract over the release of water into Assam? In what way does it affect Bangladesh, or Bangladeshi interests?
- There is no violation of international law. Please read the original documentation.
- So nothing, leaving Farakka open has nothing to do with saving Assam. Your remark is utterly meaningless. Since Farakka clearly is not connected to Assam, there is no sense in the question that you have posed in such incomprehensible language.