What's new

Bangladesh Air Force

Guys, what do you think of the idea of BAF investing in UCAVs R&D right now with emphasis on long range maritime strike, land attack, network integration and refuelling capabilities.

Such UCAVs can make it impossible for enemies to invade or impose naval blockades.
 
.
Guys, what do you think of the idea of BAF investing in UCAVs R&D right now with emphasis on long range maritime strike, land attack, network integration and refuelling capabilities.

Such UCAVs can make it impossible for enemies to invade or impose naval blockades.

Fucking Genius Idea , it makes sense anyways cause drones will become even more OP as time goes on
 
.
E40OVuoVgAMPKBh

E40OV-mUUAYrSYE

E40OWLzVIAQDDxA

Air Chief Marshal Rakesh Kumar Singh Bhadauria, PVSM, AVSM, VM, ADC arrived in Dhaka today for a 3-day visit on invitation of COAS, Bangladesh Air Force His 2nd visit to #Bangladesh on assuming command of #IndianAirForce
E4zRijJUUAAzvnQ

E4zRivhVIAUR5ZO
 
. . .
We're.......fucked

Unless we can use out T-300s to take out their dam airbase
they'll just shift their flankers to a faraway base , not a problem since flankers have really long legs. These could be used for deep strike and maritime strike for their range. Our shipping could be at risk
 
Last edited:
. .
Burmese will get 6 Su-30SMEs , i think they are ready.

cannot confirm source of image or whether it is legit. either way, BAF will fight them with their ''ottadhunik'' Mig-29

View attachment 757016


Don't rule out the upgraded MIg-29BMs that BD now has.

They have brand new radar and that allows the full capability of the R-27 BVRAAM to be brought into play.

BAF should order some dozens of extended-range R-77 and then the two aircraft will be somewhat comparable.
 
Last edited:
.
No reason for anyone to be all doomy and gloomy by MAF acquisition. You guys are giving far too much credit to Burmese for no reason.

They cannot afford to wage a war, forget blocking our shipping lane. Period.

China won't let it happen to prevent BD slipping into US quarter, US won't let it happen to bring BD under their influence against China. BD has a better image than Burmese in global stage and that has been a result of long term strategy. Be it social indicators like perceived democracy, economic growth or from the perspective of BD having an excellent rep in UN missions.

At best there will be a border skirmish between BD and Burma.
 
.
No reason for anyone to be all doomy and gloomy by MAF acquisition. You guys are giving far too much credit to Burmese for no reason.

They cannot afford to wage a war, forget blocking our shipping lane. Period.

China won't let it happen to prevent BD slipping into US quarter, US won't let it happen to bring BD under their influence against China. BD has a better image than Burmese in global stage and that has been a result of long term strategy. Be it social indicators like perceived democracy, economic growth or from the perspective of BD having an excellent rep in UN missions.

At best there will be a border skirmish between BD and Burma.
The worst thing we can do is underestimate the enemy. The Bumese never wait to seek Chinese permission on anything, they won't start now.
Burmese internal problems would have not impact on its ability to deploy MRCAs against BD.
The Chinese have greater stakes in Burma than in BD. It won't do squat.

The US will only offer lip service and maybe sell a few toys.

The bottom line is, no one will help BD if we BD does not help itself.

BAF morons are yet to get it through their heads.
 
.
The worst thing we can do is underestimate the enemy. The Bumese never wait to seek Chinese permission on anything, they won't start now.
Burmese internal problems would have not impact on its ability to deploy MRCAs against BD.
The Chinese have greater stakes in Burma than in BD. It won't do squat.

The US will only offer lip service and maybe sell a few toys.

The bottom line is, no one will help BD if we BD does not help itself.

BAF morons are yet to get it through their heads.

It's not about underestimating.

Myanmar is not at a level where they can completely dominate Bangladesh and won't be in the near future either. So any conflict will also cause substantial loss to them, which is a deterrent enough. They can start a war but cannot guarantee a significant gain of territory or whatever their objective may be.

If Myanmar had military and economic prowess relative to India, then we should be extremely worried. However, that is not the case. Hence we shouldn't be fear mongering for no reason.

Plus, if they invade BD without provocation, China and US will intervene out of their own self interest. It's not the same as killing poor people in their own territory.
 
.
It's not about underestimating.

Myanmar is not at a level where they can completely dominate Bangladesh and won't be in the near future either. So any conflict will also cause substantial loss to them, which is a deterrent enough. They can start a war but cannot guarantee a significant gain of territory or whatever their objective may be.

If Myanmar had military and economic prowess relative to India, then we should be extremely worried. However, that is not the case. Hence we shouldn't be fear mongering for no reason.

Plus, if they invade BD without provocation, China and US will intervene out of their own self interest. It's not the same as killing poor people in their own territory.

True , but we gotta make sure we're armed to the teeth and if they decide to push more of their BS against us we will not hesitate to bomb the living shits out them.
 
. .
It's not about underestimating.

Myanmar is not at a level where they can completely dominate Bangladesh and won't be in the near future either. So any conflict will also cause substantial loss to them, which is a deterrent enough. They can start a war but cannot guarantee a significant gain of territory or whatever their objective may be.

If Myanmar had military and economic prowess relative to India, then we should be extremely worried. However, that is not the case. Hence we shouldn't be fear mongering for no reason.

Plus, if they invade BD without provocation, China and US will intervene out of their own self interest. It's not the same as killing poor people in their own territory.
I think its more about causing disruption to our supply chain and economy. No military arm can succeed without air power. MRCA is not a luxury but a necessecity. Disruption has the potential to reverse economic gains of the past decades. Plus the Burmese are not a responsible state actor, they won't follow the rules, we have more to loose.

National Security Bole kotha @Destranator
 
.
It's not about underestimating.

Myanmar is not at a level where they can completely dominate Bangladesh and won't be in the near future either. So any conflict will also cause substantial loss to them, which is a deterrent enough. They can start a war but cannot guarantee a significant gain of territory or whatever their objective may be.

If Myanmar had military and economic prowess relative to India, then we should be extremely worried. However, that is not the case. Hence we shouldn't be fear mongering for no reason.

Plus, if they invade BD without provocation, China and US will intervene out of their own self interest. It's not the same as killing poor people in their own territory.
I am not talking about any invasion. Myanmar has no need to invade. A few air strikes on Chittagong to destroy the port and the lone refinery is enough to cripple BD. Burmese economics is irrelevant in this context.
China and US won't do squat. As I have already explained, the Chinese stand to lose more by getting involved while the US is neither capable of intervening quickly enough before the damage is done nor does it have anything to gain.
Let's stop making excuses for the pathetic spineless organisation that BAF is.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom