Ban on controversial Punjabi movie. A new low in Sikh-India relations?
- Thread starter gotti
- Start date
- Status
Yes Wannabe Arabs should vacate to Arabian Peninsula
Are you saying Deoband (Devbandiya) and Barelvi (Raebareilly) are "wannabe" Arabs or are you using it as a euphemism to refer to the general Muslim populace just like you label all Christians as "wannabe" Europeans or the entire Tamil issue on the "church".
Please try to veil your xenophobic bigotry in a more convincing way.
Srinivas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 12,455
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
"a group" of protesters make a civil rights movements?!
Congrats, your "analysis" of this mass movement is truly adorable.
OT: Censor Board decided that this film might spark problems among certain radical elements, thus it banned it. Nothing special, happens in every democratic country.
Anyone who does not believe in waving the "saffron" flag whilst marching to kill unarmed and innocent Christians in Madhya Pradesh and Muslims in Gujarat, in their homes, is not to be taken seriously.
You've told me this before, and I've understood your perspective.
Why keep repeating it, countlessly?
neehar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2012
- Messages
- 2,725
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
gotti..u showed ur love to our minorities,tamils,shaivites,now sikhs..why not telugu gotti..why dis kolaveridi??please liberate us too
Srinivas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 12,455
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
Oh ....... I hurt your feeling, sorry for that
. But You are forgetting what your Caliph Zia told you you are Arab decent so pack your stuff and don't hurt the feeling of Sikhs by occupying the lands and river basin of Sikhs Sikh Youth is pretty pissed
gotti jee check this out
Thank you for the share but brother, as you may already be aware of my way of thinking, I only believe in the Mandela and MLK Jr. style civil rights movement and don't think this is something I can condone or appreciate.
BTW, I didn't add Gandhi to the list because he was only a spokesperson and representative of one specific community and that too, unashamedly, which caused the Muslim Jinnah to choose his own path where religious symbolism was not being used for a "united" movement.
Similarly, the Sikhs have realized that India is not "united" or a true representation of pluralism because they aren't even allowed to marry under Sikh law as they have to do so under the Hindu law (indirectly being labelled as a sect of Hinduism like Vaishnavism and Shaivism).
Even Pakistan allowed them this right through the Anand Karaj Act, which prompted them to chant "Pakistan Zindabad" in India.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZQL5Vz6UsM
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm only replying, also nepalese are buddhists never met a single hindu nepali
neehar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2012
- Messages
- 2,725
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Oh ....... I hurt your feeling, sorry for that
atla kadu bayya adki cheppedi raddu pettali nakodukki
hes a troll dont get involved urself into this
Srinivas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 12,455
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
Just read about Nepal it is the only declared Hindu country, Bhutan is a Buddhist country .
I am also vehemently against such violence Gotti jee that is why I was worried when so many Sikhs were cheering this scene
Srinivas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 12,455
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
Oh ....... I hurt your feeling, sorry for that
I believe that Muslims of India are not of Arab-origin because by doing so, I am using the logic of Hitler who believed the Jews were foreign and his lands had to be cleansed as per the Aryan tradition, which was observed in India where they cleansed the North from the Dravidians.
Similarly, you trying to use this logic now is no different when it comes to the Sikhs, who you believe are not part of India and should go to Pakistan because of their holy lands being there.
This is despicable. I believe the Sikhs should be granted more autonomy and rights.
Koovie
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,288
- Reaction score
- 6
I am not even Hindu, so dont tell me anything about hindutva ....
Brother I also added the following to the post you quoted me in: "Similarly, the Sikhs have realized that India is not "united" or a true representation of pluralism because they aren't even allowed to marry under Sikh law as they have to do so under the Hindu law (indirectly being labelled as a sect of Hinduism like Vaishnavism and Shaivism).
Even Pakistan allowed them this right through the Anand Karaj Act, which prompted them to chant "Pakistan Zindabad" in India.
Sikhs chanting "Pakistan Zindabad" in India - YouTube"
End quote.
It is natural that we are worried because we are not bloodthirsty people like the Indians who abandon an entire population of people, like the Tamilians over mere geopolitical gains. We don't war, rebellion or hate and neither are we promoting it.
I was only asking the question from the Indians, why is this happening and wanted a valid reason behind it.
But, addicted to their habit of trolling and diverting the issues to Pakistan, they did not reply and are continuing to repeat nonsensical BS, with an addition of the lone champion of the greater Punjab cause.
BTW, if you could tell me when the Muslim leagues are uniting to get this plan settled out, I would be greatly indebted.
- Status
Similar threads
