I can't really make out what you are saying. Too much verbal diarrhea. I didn't give any "who is superior" rhetoric, whatever that is.
Here is the point - this particular news item, which forms the basis of this thread, has been reported by many sources. They are all quoting the Baloch chief minister directly, who said he doesn't have any proof of Indian involvement.
On the other hand, your claim that the Indian army chief admitted it is a made up story by news.pk, the same people who earlier made up fake wikileaks. No reputed news organization, Indian or Pakistani or neutral has reported it. There is such a thing as credibility, and judging credibility on the internet is not that difficult to do.
Go read that news.pk report and it is obvious that it is made up, since it doesn't quote anybody, or say where they got their info. I knew that a fake news by one website, and Pakistanis would be parroting that as gospel truth from now on.
Repeat - this new, reported by multiple sources. The other news - only reported by news.pk, famous for making up fake news and having to apologize.
That should give you a hint as to how to separate what to believe from what you want to believe.
If you don't agree with somebody's point you call it verbal diarrhea lol. Secondly i never said that i am trusting one source over the other so don't give a speech about what to believe and what you think others want to believe. If you really wanted to know facts you wouldn't respond as you did but that you can't help i guess. I never said you're ex Army Chief was the only man who claimed such things there were others too but obviously like i said earlier proof is proof enough until it isn't directed at India.