What's new

Balance Of Air Power In South Asia

Sir,

Please kindly allow me to say that you have been a nobody on this forum---and this by no means shows any disrespect to you---.

But with less than 9 posts a year---you have not been a part of sharing INTELLIGENT DISCOURSE on this forum---. But when you have 25000 posts---many maybe good---but some maybe bad---it is not perfect all the time---.

It is easy to be a critic---why don't you jump in the arena and start writing---please kindly allow us to rip your posts apart ---and wait for your 'reposte'.

Now look at @Joe Shearer ---a very good man that I have great respect for---just got twisted bad.

Does he think that he does not have any stupid or idiotic posts---he has quite a few---. Do I lash out at him---or do I jump on him at every opportunity that I get to put him down----no---because I know that he is an intelligent respectable senior member---and out of respect---I stay away from commenting on his posts most of the times---even though I know that they are flawed and lack truth.

On a rare occasion or two maybe I would comment on his posts---but I don't make it my right to put him down at every opportune moment---.

Again---my apologies for offending your senses---but it is life---shit happens---Donald Trump gets elected---.




Hi,

There is a very easy solution---.

Please click on my screen name---go to my profile page----click on the ignore list---and I will be out of your life.

See---from your last few posts---it looks like---you are exactly the person or the group of people---in the Paf that I have been writing about---and maybe---lately----I might have stumbled upon something and written about something---that has touched a nerve---hit very close to home---and you are now jumping out of your shoes---.

Otherwise my rhetoric against the Paf has not changed---maybe a little mellower no and not as often and detailed as it used to be before.

So---that is what my surprise is---what did I say to get this reaction from you? That is what is most interesting.
I personally love your writing style and your tone. You speak like a commander, whether or not someone likes it. The message needs to get across. Keep up the attitude and your style. It has become Mastan khan trademark
 
.
I have never read bigger crap.

There was no shortage of ammunition; the guns were firing as the ersatz-mujahedin crept their way out, they were firing at ammo depots, they caused the maximum casualties. They were certainly firing right through the period of hostilities.

Secondly, there was no economic upheaval at that time, or later. Check your figures; this kind of tendentious, unadulterated rubbish comes very poorly from a respected member such as you.

Musharraf had nobody with him, not even his own government. I don't know if you are one of the dying breed of Musharraf fans, but the entire thing was an unseemly debacle, and he was a joint author.

Please stay out of the ranks of the fan-boys. This is an humble admirer's request. This is one of the two worst posts I have seen you make, and I am disappointed, deeply disappointed.

And I hope you will not have the bad manners to use 'son' to buttress your arguments if you choose to respond to this.


Hi,

Joe---I don't think that I have ever addressed you in that manner---even when your posts stank---I never even responded---it was out of respect for you---even though I could have said a few things---but you are a time tested poster and you are a part of the board---so---big deal if you made an outrageous claim or lied blatantly one time or another---big deal---sh-it happen.

But this venom of your did not come as a surprise to me because you have been posturing for the right moment---.

I thought that those comments of yours were beneath you out of mutual respect from the past---but then you know yourself better than me.

Zain Khan & Air Marshal (R) Masood Akhtar | Tactical Talk


Hi,

Thank you for posting the video---. This video shows the illusion that the Paf has been living under---.

No doubt the BLK52 is an extremely potent aircraft---then why was its purchase not made in the right numbers in a timely manner---.

This is the Paf mentality I talk about " when I want to hug and kiss someone---I look in the mirror ".

There was no game plan---tact---strategy involved in getting this aircraft.

The air marshall is a blatant liar when he portrays that the outdated lower tiered aircraft to be more competitive against the enemy's higher tiered aircraft.
 
.
Sir,

Please kindly allow me to say that you have been a nobody on this forum---and this by no means shows any disrespect to you---.

But with less than 9 posts a year---you have not been a part of sharing INTELLIGENT DISCOURSE on this forum---. But when you have 25000 posts---many maybe good---but some maybe bad---it is not perfect all the time---.

It is easy to be a critic---why don't you jump in the arena and start writing---please kindly allow us to rip your posts apart ---and wait for your 'reposte'.

Now look at @Joe Shearer ---a very good man that I have great respect for---just got twisted bad.

Does he think that he does not have any stupid or idiotic posts---he has quite a few---. Do I lash out at him---or do I jump on him at every opportunity that I get to put him down----no---because I know that he is an intelligent respectable senior member---and out of respect---I stay away from commenting on his posts most of the times---even though I know that they are flawed and lack truth.

On a rare occasion or two maybe I would comment on his posts---but I don't make it my right to put him down at every opportune moment---.

Again---my apologies for offending your senses---but it is life---shit happens---Donald Trump gets elected---.




Hi,

There is a very easy solution---.

Please click on my screen name---go to my profile page----click on the ignore list---and I will be out of your life.

See---from your last few posts---it looks like---you are exactly the person or the group of people---in the Paf that I have been writing about---and maybe---lately----I might have stumbled upon something and written about something---that has touched a nerve---hit very close to home---and you are now jumping out of your shoes---.

Otherwise my rhetoric against the Paf has not changed---maybe a little mellower now and not as often and detailed as it used to be before.

So---that is what my surprise is---what did I say to get this reaction from you? That is what is most interesting.

This forum is not real life Mastan, it does not matter if I am a nobody on this forum, really. Simple request, which judging from your response you seem to be getting although I sense a struggle, If i call you a name or am disrespectful please do so in return, otherwise put your point across in a respectful manner as an adult of your almost sixty years should do. As regarding your wild hypothesis regarding the PAF, personally they are nothing more than irritating to read considering what I know, I now just smile when I read them. Carry on friend, as long as you are not rude towards me I consider this matter closed.
 
Last edited:
.
Hi,

Joe---I don't think that I have ever addressed you in that manner---even when your posts stank---I never even responded---it was out of respect for you---even though I could have said a few things---but you are a time tested poster and you are a part of the board---so---big deal if you made an outrageous claim or lied blatantly one time or another---big deal---sh-it happen.

But this venom of your did not come as a surprise to me because you have been posturing for the right moment---.

I thought that those comments of yours were beneath you out of mutual respect from the past---but then you know yourself better than me.



Hi,

Thank you for posting the video---. This video shows the illusion that the Paf has been living under---.

No doubt the BLK52 is an extremely potent aircraft---then why was its purchase not made in the right numbers in a timely manner---.

This is the Paf mentality I talk about " when I want to hug and kiss someone---I look in the mirror ".

There was no game plan---tact---strategy involved in getting this aircraft.

The air marshall is a blatant liar when he portrays that the outdated lower tiered aircraft to be more competitive against the enemy's higher tiered aircraft.
Sir I have been reading your posts since very long even on that time I wasn't the members of this forum, your aproch is realistic, your pain and grief on incompetency of the PAF is quite justify able ,its always being something wrong in the high brasses of PAF ,but our national dilemma is this that in the blind love of our forces we never accept a positive and constructive criticism on them ,a true patriot is not that who hides blunders made to nation, but is one who identifies the mistakes and tries to point them,your input is always pleasure to read
 
.
Mastan Khan. I,m an old fan of you and you live in a realistic world. Can you point out, what PAF 10 years plane should be?
 
.
This forum is not real life Mastan, it does not matter if I am a nobody on this forum, really. Simple request, which judging from your response you seem to be getting although I sense a struggle, If i call you a name or am disrespectful please do so in return, otherwise put your point across in a respectful manner as an adult of your almost sixty years should do. As regarding your wild hypothesis regarding the PAF, personally they are nothing more than irritating to read considering what I know, I now just smile when I read them. Carry on friend, as long as you are not rude towards me I consider this matter closed.


If it had been a closed matter---you would not have replied.

The nation is dying in front of you---you have not written anything about it in 8 years---.

But my posts irritated you so much---that you had to lift your fingers---.

Wa'Allah---priorities of a man.

Remember the IGNORE button---it is there to be used.

Mastan Khan. I,m an old fan of you and you live in a realistic world. Can you point out, what PAF 10 years plane should be?

Hi,

Sometimes you have to step backwards to move forward---. You have to see what the world super power is doing---.

Look at the americans---they have invested so much in their 5th gen aircraft---. But then they also understand the importance of these lethal LR SAMs. So---their game plan changed some 10 years ago.

They know that in order to reach the enemy and soften it up---it will have to strike hard---strike deep---. The 5th gen aircraft cannot do that ( they can---the B2 can---but look at its cost )---. For that they turned back to their old aircraft---started upgrading them---refurbished them---gave them new life with advanced EW suite and standoff weapons.

The 'new' miracle aircraft of the 21st century is not the F22 or the F35 ( they both are )---it is the re-furbished B52 bomber and the re-furbished B1 bombers---with their abilities to stand and deliver from far out distances to soften out the outer layers of enemy defenses and slowly move inwards---or deliver BVR missiles at the command of the 5th gen aircraft.

The issue is not rocket science---it is very simple---you have to strike at enemy's softer point to gain advantage---. Until and unless the Paf does not have the capability to fly down stream flying parallel to the enemy coastline and deliver from standoff distances at the enemy---the war is considered lost.

Amongst the first and foremost aircraft is either a JH7B or a J16 type of aircraft---.
 
Last edited:
.
If it had been a closed matter---you would not have replied.

The nation is dying in front of you---you have not written anything about it in 8 years---.

But my posts irritated you so much---that you had to lift your fingers---.

Wa'Allah---priorities of a man.

Remember the IGNORE button---it is there to be used.



Hi,

Sometimes you have to step backwards to move forward---. You have to see what the world super power is doing---.

Look at the americans---they have invested so much in their 5th gen aircraft---. But then they also understand the importance of these lethal LR SAMs. So---their game plan changed some 10 years ago.

They know that in order to reach the enemy and soften it up---it will have to strike hard---strike deep---. The 5th gen aircraft cannot do that ( then can---the B2 can---but look at its cost )---. For that they turned back to their old aircraft---started upgrading them---refurbished them---gave them new life with advanced EW suite and standoff weapons.

The 'new' miracle aircraft of the 21st century is not the F22 or the F35 ( they both are )---it is the re-furbished B52 bomber and the re-furbished B1 bombers---with their abilities to stand and deliver from far out distances to soften out the outer layers of enemy defenses and slowly move inwards---or deliver BVR missiles at the command of the 5th gen aircraft.

The issue is not rocket science---it is very simple---you have to strike at enemy's softer point to gain advantage---. Until and unless the Paf does not have the capability to fly down stream flying parallel to the enemy coastline and deliver from standoff distances at the enemy---the war is considered lost.

Amongst the first and foremost aircraft is either a JH7B or a J16 type of aircraft---.

Mastan, you are just not getting it! What nation is dying, why do I have to write about it for over 8 years! Apparently you have been writing about it for 11 years, what good has that done? Its funny as hell that you think that anybody in the establishment reads what you write or cares at all. You have a child like understanding of how air power works and you state the blindingly obvious, anyone can spout off on a forum and then feel like they have achieved something, still since this is a forum you can say whatever you want as long as you act your age and not your shoe size. You are not irritating me and the others Mastan its just that people are tired of your sweeping authoritative statements and your consistent rudeness. For example you are bringing the F22 and F35 into a deep strike argument which they were never intended for, it is obvious that this is the job for the B1, B2 and B52 and the like, this is obvious, you are stating the fricken obvious man!
 
.
Mastan, you are just not getting it! What nation is dying, why do I have to write about it for over 8 years! Apparently you have been writing about it for 11 years, what good has that done? Its funny as hell that you think that anybody in the establishment reads what you write or cares at all. You have a child like understanding of how air power works and you state the blindingly obvious, anyone can spout off on a forum and then feel like they have achieved something, still since this is a forum you can say whatever you want as long as you act your age and not your shoe size. You are not irritating me and the others Mastan its just that people are tired of your sweeping authoritative statements and your consistent rudeness. For example you are bringing the F22 and F35 into a deep strike argument which they were never intended for, it is obvious that this is the job for the B1, B2 and B52 and the like, this is obvious, you are stating the fricken obvious man!

Hi,

Ignorance is a bliss----. The B52's and the B1's will be using their weapons thru the compliments of the F22's and F35's---which can sneak in deeper into enemy territory without being detected---select the weapons on the heavies and launch them while the heavies are flying far out---thru DATA LINK.

This was not OBVIOUIS---the pilot and navigator of the heavies may just be doing their flying and suddenly their bomb bays will open and weapons deployed.

The part of the B1 during a BVR conflict---acting as a BVR missile truck---when was that obvious---?

You did not know that part----surprised---that over 1 hour video was posted by our esteemed member Aamir Hussein---it would be still floating around somewhere---.

Again---please don't address me---address the issue---.

If you think it is not worth your time to speak about issues---then it is your choice---. Why are you imposing yourself on others who wish to-=--.

As I stated---use the ignore option.

The US Air Force wants to deploy ‘arsenal planes’ to improve the F-35’s limited firepower

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...planes-to-improve-the-f-35s-limited-firepower


When I mentioned the B52 and the B1---it was not the 20th century aircraft---but the 21st century upgraded aircraft with sensors and EW package not imagined on the older frames---.
 
.
Hi,

Ignorance is a bliss----. The B52's and the B1's will be using their weapons thru the compliments of the F22's and F35's---which can sneak in deeper into enemy territory without being detected---select the weapons on the heavies and launch them while the heavies are flying far out---thru DATA LINK.

This was not OBVIOUIS---the pilot and navigator of the heavies may just be doing their flying and suddenly their bomb bays will open and weapons deployed.

The part of the B1 during a BVR conflict---acting as a BVR missile truck---when was that obvious---?

You did not know that part----surprised---that over 1 hour video was posted by our esteemed member Aamir Hussein---it would be still floating around somewhere---.

Again---please don't address me---address the issue---.

If you think it is not worth your time to speak about issues---then it is your choice---. Why are you imposing yourself on others who wish to-=--.

As I stated---use the ignore option.

The US Air Force wants to deploy ‘arsenal planes’ to improve the F-35’s limited firepower

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...planes-to-improve-the-f-35s-limited-firepower


When I mentioned the B52 and the B1---it was not the 20th century aircraft---but the 21st century upgraded aircraft with sensors and EW package not imagined on the older frames---.

Armchair gibberish.
 
. . . .
Wouldn't "arsenal planes" defeat the entire purpose of stealth? I'm assuming that the arsenal planes would not be stealth at all.
 
.
Armchair gibberish.
You are definitely entitled to your views, but being rude is not one of them.

Mr.Mastan, has often raised very valid points, and knows what he is talking about. His criticisms are quite valid, and should be looked at as such. Instead of personal attacks, try answering the points he raises.

Best Regards
 
.
Zain Khan & Air Marshal (R) Masood Akhtar | Tactical Talk

The Trump also seems to have a soft spot for India. Just last month, he attended an elaborate charity event hosted by Republican Hindu Coalition (RHC) and promised that India and the US would be “best friends” if he were president.
So, what would a Trump presidency mean for Pakistan? stop depending on USA kick all corrupt leaders improve economy defense relations with other super powers .Arab countries head not sincere with Muslims trump key in there hand.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom