Balakot, clouds and BS Dhanoa can't let it go

[Mumm-Ra]

Excuse me? Which base did you bomb?
The only claim is we "acted" as if attacking the bases and missed on purpose? the last time I checked that doesnt count as bombing anything.

It's like shooting in the air and then claiming I shot the enemy standing in front of me.




And that is exactly why we have one ancient garbage mig and its pilot to show for that "total command of the battle field".

We did indians because they believe the drama and stories of their government. We need to start questioning and stopping blind following of our own too.
The need to start acting and not talking, show us what you did, not what you claim you did or could have done. This nation needs to stop being convinced by words alone.


Pakistani Establishment and Army Generals need to stop talking less and doing more. Only fools talk more.
And we keep hearing about our impenetrable defense over and over and over. The last time I checked we had bombs exploding every day in our impenetrable defended land, and it took as a whole decade to overcome that after having created the situation ourselves by a coward general agreeing to be a part of it over a single threat of being bombed to stone age over the phone.

My dear bro, there is an entire treasure trove worth of information on the targeted facilities in the relevant thread. better minds than mine have explained what went on during those two fateful days in detail. It would be discourteous to present their information as my own here. Go check out the thread: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/27-f...fts-inside-pakistani-airspace-dg-ispr.604031/

Secondly, the mig was shot down because it entered into our territory. Had the SUs followed suit also, we might have had its wreckage as well. Alas, they scurried away from the battlefield and it seems that we brought one down anyway.

I agree with you in principle that our government should have more transparency and the reports that have been made during for this occasion may be shared after passage of a certain times. You agree that various info pertaining to military matters is need-to-know only.

Finally, who are we to say no to hyper crazed super power hell bent on destroying everything in its path.

 

[War Thunder]

My dear bro, there is an entire treasure trove worth of information on the targeted facilities in the relevant thread. better minds than mine have explained what went on during those two fateful days in detail. It would be discourteous to present their information as my own here. Go check out the thread: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/27-f...fts-inside-pakistani-airspace-dg-ispr.604031/

Secondly, the mig was shot down because it entered into our territory. Had the SUs followed suit also, we might have had its wreckage as well. Alas, they scurried away from the battlefield and it seems that we brought one down anyway.

I agree with you in principle that our government should have more transparency and the reports that have been made during for this occasion may be shared after passage of a certain times. You agree that various info pertaining to military matters is need-to-know only.

Finally, who are we to say no to hyper crazed super power hell bent on destroying everything in its path.

Man I understand that. But we did not bomb anything and that's the problem. They came into our space to bomb, they could not due to any reason and that's another thing.
But what did we respond with? We showed them we "can" bomb, if we wanted.
That shows we are unwilling to go hit them, not even at the same scale as them.
Something should have been blown, that helps keep the foe in check.
I understand, no one wanted a war, but when you cower away, you tell the enemy come hit us again. Which they eventually will, and this time with more preparation and tactics to deter yours.

 

[Mumm-Ra]

Man I understand that. But we did not bomb anything and that's the problem. They came into our space to bomb, they could not due to any reason and that's another thing.
But what did we respond with? We showed them we "can" bomb, if we wanted.
That shows we are unwilling to go hit them, not even at the same scale as them.
Something should have been blown, that helps keep the foe in check.
I understand, no one wanted a war, but when you cower away, you tell the enemy come hit us again. Which they eventually will, and this time with more preparation and tactics to deter yours.

I am often reminded of this quote that talk lightly but keep a big stick. It was always expected that they will attack again. They would have done so now if the technological gap between the two airforces was vastly in their favour. They are still suffering from the hangover of Kargil. However, our policy is to give them appropriate response. Had the bombs done their work, we would have flattened their structures as well. The only flaw in this technique is that it causes us to have a reactive approach. Anyhow, maintain trust in your forces. Hopefully, the next round will be even more in our favour.

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Excuse me? Which base did you bomb?
The only claim is we "acted" as if attacking the bases and missed on purpose? the last time I checked that doesnt count as bombing anything.

It's like shooting in the air and then claiming I shot the enemy standing in front of me.




And that is exactly why we have one ancient garbage mig and its pilot to show for that "total command of the battle field".

We did indians because they believe the drama and stories of their government. We need to start questioning and stopping blind following of our own too.
The need to start acting and not talking, show us what you did, not what you claim you did or could have done. This nation needs to stop being convinced by words alone.


Pakistani Establishment and Army Generals need to stop talking less and doing more. Only fools talk more.
And we keep hearing about our impenetrable defense over and over and over. The last time I checked we had bombs exploding every day in our impenetrable defended land, and it took as a whole decade to overcome that after having created the situation ourselves by a coward general agreeing to be a part of it over a single threat of being bombed to stone age over the phone.

Are you a 5 star ACG Arms Chair General?

Man I understand that. But we did not bomb anything and that's the problem. They came into our space to bomb, they could not due to any reason and that's another thing.
But what did we respond with? We showed them we "can" bomb, if we wanted.
That shows we are unwilling to go hit them, not even at the same scale as them.
Something should have been blown, that helps keep the foe in check.
I understand, no one wanted a war, but when you cower away, you tell the enemy come hit us again. Which they eventually will, and this time with more preparation and tactics to deter yours.

PAF targeted near vicinity of multiple IA targets. Hitting any of them directly would be an act of war. The threat was neutralized and NO more surGkal strike by Bollywood air force.
Pakistan military no dough had upper hand during February conflict.

 

[newb3e]

according to jee newjs the thought of pakistan gives bs errection

so his obsession with Pakistan is justified!

 

[nomi007]

I cant understand this
BS Dhanoa
why we take him serious

 

[waz]

https://theprint.in/defence/if-we-h...ets-after-balakot-iaf-ex-chief-dhanoa/363080/


We lost a MiG-21, but Pakistan lost an F-16 that we cannot prove.

 

[blain2]

at least he agrees that currently, they don't have any capability to do anything
only after rafale they dream to do something..

this is also a red-flag for Pakistani establishment..somehow the Indians have cracked the case that Pakistan may not reply "disproportionately" to their aggression. They have thus created a subthreshold..

its imperative that delusion of this subthreshold should be squashed ..
with IAF maintaining it killed 100s via voodoo magic should Pakistan have stroke actual targets?

the counter has to be better situational awareness in form of better AWECs, jamming and long-range stands off weapon for both air to air and air to ground use..if you can't get one, develop one..

Pakistan's response will be "status-quo Plus" always.

 

[ziaulislam]

https://theprint.in/defence/if-we-h...ets-after-balakot-iaf-ex-chief-dhanoa/363080/


We lost a MiG-21, but Pakistan lost an F-16 that we cannot prove.

Oh i forget to mention we killed 6 in a chopper as well